17 Amendments of Bettina VOLLATH related to 2020/2012(INL)
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Underlines that the risk assessment of these technologies in light of ethical principles shall be complementary but not replace the risk assessment on the basis of objective criteria and in line with relevant sector- specific legislation applicable in different fields such, inter alia, as those of health, transport, employment, justice and home affairs, media, education and culture;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Considers that any artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies, including the software, algorithms and data used or produced by such technologies considered as high-risk from a compliance with ethical principles perspective shall not be classified as low- risk from a sector-specific legislation perspective;
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Considers that a common European framework for the governance of these technologies prepared by the European Commission or another relevant institution, body, office or agency of the Union (such as a European Agency for Artificial Intelligence, as called for below) designated for this task should be the basis for this governance in order to ensure a coherent European approach and prevent a fragmentation of the single market;
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Notes that these authorities shall cooperate with the authorities responsible for implementing sectorial legislation in order to identify technologies which are high-risk from an ethical perspective and in order to supervise the implementation of required and appropriate measures where such technologies are identified;
Amendment 216 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Calls on the Commission to follow- up on that request, especially in view of the added-value of having a body at Union level coordinating the mandates and actions of each national supervisory authority as referred to in the previous sub- section and drafting a common framework for the governance of the development, deployment and use of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies;
Amendment 334 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part A – point V – indent 3 a (new)
Annex I – part A – point V – indent 3 a (new)
- to draft a common framework for the governance of the development, deployment and use of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies to be implemented by the national supervisory authorities;
Amendment 352 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part A – point VI – indent 4
Annex I – part A – point VI – indent 4
- to be responsible for establishimplementing standards for the governance of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies, including by liaising with the maximum possible number of stakeholders and civil society representatives.
Amendment 353 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part A – point VI – indent 4 a (new)
Annex I – part A – point VI – indent 4 a (new)
- to cooperate with the authorities responsible for implementing sectorial legislation in order to identify technologies which are high-risk from an ethical perspective and in order to supervise the implementation of required and appropriate measures where such technologies are identified;
Amendment 400 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – recital 10
Annex I – part B – recital 10
(10) Notwithstanding the risk assessment carried out in relation to compliance with ethical principles, artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies, including the software, algorithms and data used or produced by such technologies, should always be assessed as to their risk and subject to corresponding legal obligations on the basis of objective criteria and in line with relevant sector-specific legislation applicable in different fields such as those of health, transport, employment, justice and home affairs, media, education and culture.
Amendment 402 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – recital 10 a (new)
Annex I – part B – recital 10 a (new)
(10a) Any artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies, including the software, algorithms and data used or produced by such technologies considered as high-risk from a compliance with ethical principles perspective shall not be classified as low risk from a sector- specific legislation perspective.
Amendment 462 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – recital 38
Annex I – part B – recital 38
(38) The effective application of the ethical principles laid down in this Regulation will largely depend on Member States’ appointment of an independent public authority to act as a supervisory authority. In particular, each national supervisory authority should be responsible for assessing and monitoring the compliance ofidentifying artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies considered a high-risk and for assessing and monitoring the compliance of these technologies in light of the obligations set out in this Regulation.
Amendment 464 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – recital 39
Annex I – part B – recital 39
(39) Each national supervisory authority shall also carry the responsibility of regulating the governance of these technologies in accordance with a common framework prepared by the European Commission or another relevant institution, body, office or agency of the Union designated for this task. They therefore have an important role to play in promoting the trust and safety of Union citizens, as well as in enabling a democratic, pluralistic and equitable society.
Amendment 467 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – recital 39 a (new)
Annex I – part B – recital 39 a (new)
(39a) National supervisory authorities shall cooperate with the authorities responsible for assessing and monitoring artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies, including the software, algorithms and data used or produced by such technologies and enforcing their compliance in the light of sectorial legislation in order to identify technologies which are high-risk from an ethical perspective and in order to supervise the implementation of required and appropriate measures where such technologies are identified;
Amendment 483 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – recital 46
Annex I – part B – recital 46
(46) Action at Union level as set out in this Regulation would be best achieved through the establishment of a European Agency for Artificial Intelligence. Such a body would be essential in coordinating the mandates and actions of the national supervisory authorities in each Member State, outlining objective criteria for the risk assessment of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies, drafting a common framework for the governance of the development, deployment and use of these technologies, developing and issuing a certification of compliance with the ethical principles laid down in this Regulation, supporting regular exchanges with concerned stakeholders and civil society, promoting the Union’s approach through international cooperation and ensuring a consistent reply worldwide to the opportunities and risks inherent in these technologies.
Amendment 625 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – Article 13 – paragraph 1
Annex I – part B – Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. Artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies developed, deployed or used in the Union shall comply with relevant governance standards establishdrafted by the European Commission or another relevant institution, body, office or agency of the Union designated for this task and implemented by the national supervisory authorities referred to in Article 14 in accordance with Union law, principles and values.
Amendment 634 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – Article 14 – paragraph 1
Annex I – part B – Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall designate an independent public authority to be responsible for monitoring the application of this Regulation (‘supervisory authority’). In accordance with Article 7(1) and (2), each national supervisory authority shall be responsible for assessing whether artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies, including software, algorithms and data used or produced by such technologies, developed, deployed and used in the Union are high-risk technologies in view of the ethical principles set out in this Regulation and, if so, for assessing and monitoring their compliance with the ethicalse principles set out in this Regulation.
Amendment 635 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – Article 14 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Annex I – part B – Article 14 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Each national supervisory authority shall supervise the implementation of the legislation in force and, where applicable, the enforceable sectorial regulations arising when a technology is identified as a high-risk technology in view of the ethical principles set out in this Regulation. For this purpose, the supervisory authorities shall cooperate with the sectorial authorities in charge of assessing and monitoring artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies, including the software, algorithms and data used or produced by such technologies and enforcing their compliance in the light of sectorial legislation.