31 Amendments of Isabel BENJUMEA BENJUMEA related to 2021/0385(COD)
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) Dark trading is trading without pre- trade transparency, using the reference price waiver laid down in Article 4(1), point (a) of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 and the negotiated trade waiver laid down in Article 4(a) point (a), point (i) of that Regulation. The use of both waivers is capped by the double volume cap (‘DVC’). The DVC is a mechanism that limits the level of dark trading to a certain proportion of total trading in an equity instrument. The amount of dark trading in an equity instrument on an individual venue may not exceed 4% of total trading in that instrument in the Union. When this threshold is breached, dark trading in that instrument on that venue is suspended. Secondly the amount of dark trading in an equity instrument in the Union may not exceed 8% of total trading in that instrument in the Union. When this threshold is breached all dark trading in that instrument is suspended. The venue specific threshold leaves room for continued use of those waivers on other platforms on which trading in that equity instrument is not yet suspended, until the Union wide threshold is breached. This causes complexity in terms of monitoring the levels of dark trading and of enforcing the suspension. To simplify the double volume cap while keeping its effectiveness, the new single volume cap should rely solely on the EU-wide threshold. That threshold should be lowered to 7 % to compensate for a potential increase of trading under those waivers as a consequence of abolishing the venue specific thresholdIn order to reduce complexity and align the Union with international practices, the cap mechanism should be suspended for at least five years. ESMA, which would be empowered to monitor market conditions and, in particular, the price formation process and the liquidity available on lit venues, should review the suspension at the end of the five year period. At the end of the five-year suspension period, ESMA should in its final report detailing the impact of the suspension on Union markets. On the basis of that report the Commission should consider whether i) to renew the suspension, ii) revert to a cap at 10% of EU-wide trading threshold, or iii) delete the provisions related to the cap mechanism altogether.
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) To ensure an adequate level of transparency, the price of a non-equity transaction should be published as close to real time as possible and only be delayed until maximally the end of the trading day. However, in order not to expose liquidity providers in non-equity instruments to undue risk, it should be possible to mask the price and volumes of very large or illiquid transactions for a shortlonger period of time, which should not be longer than twoexceed four weeks. The exact calibration of the various buckets corresponding to different time deferrals should be left to ESMA due to the technical expertise required to specify the calibration as well as due to the need to allow for the flexibility to amend the calibration. Those deferrals should be based on the liquidity of the non-equity instrument (using the issuance size as a proxy), the size of the transaction and, for bonds(trade size), the credit rating of the non-equity instrument, and it should no longer include the size specific to the instrument concerned nor the large in scale size. In order to simplify the pre- trade transparency regime for bonds and derivatives, the size specific to the instrument should be removed, and the large in scale size should be lowered so that only one threshold remains at an adequate level.
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Article 13 of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 requires market operators and investment firms operating a trading venue to make the pre-trade and post-trade information on transactions in financial instruments available to the public on a reasonable commercial basis (‘RCB’), and to ensure non-discriminatory access to that information. That Article has, however, not delivered on its objectives. The information provided by trading venues, APAs and systematic internalisers on a reasonable commercial basis does not enable users to understand market data policies and how the price for market data is set. ESMA issued guidelines explaining how the concept of RCB should be applied. These guidelines should be converted to legal obligations. Due to the high level of detail required to specify RCB and the required flexibility in amending the applicable rules based on the fast changing data landscape, ESMA should be empowered to develop draft regulatory technical standards specifying how RCB should be applied, thereby further strengthening the harmonised and consistent application of Article 13 of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014. Furthermore, the provision to provide market data on the basis of costs of producing and disseminating the market data is moved to the Level 1 text. Such a move would allow to further specify the general principle via Level 2 measures bearing in mind that the market data is a by-product of the trading activity. Additionally, there is added a requirement in the Level 1 text for trading venues, APAs, SIs and CTPs to share information on the actual costs for producing and disseminating market data as well as on the margins included with CAs and ESMA combined with an empowerment of ESMA to develop draft regulatory technical standards specifying the content, format and terminology of suchinformation.Article13 shall be amended to remove references to pricing based on the value generated by the data user. Art. 86 (2) of Delegated Regulation 2017/565 and Art 8 (2) of Delegated Regulation 2017/567. These articles run counter to the objectives of Article 13, as they allow venues to charge for market data proportionate to the value the market data represents to users, thereby pushing up prices regularly and increasing the number of complicated licensing structures which add additional costs to the investor.
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) Competition among consolidated tape providers ensures that the consolidated tape is provided in the most efficient way and under the best conditions for users. However, no entity has, up until now, applied to act as a consolidated tape provider. It is therefore considered appropriate to empower ESMA to periodically organise a competitive selection procedure to select a single entity which is able to provide the consolidated tape for each specified asset class. Taking intoESMA should prioritise the selection and authorisation of ac count the novelty of the proposed scheme, ESMA should only mandate the provision of post-trade transparency data for the first selection procedure that it runs in relation to shares. At least 18 months before the launch of the second selection procedure, ESMA should submit a report to the Commission assessing whether there is market demand for extending the data contributed to the tape to pre-trade data. On the basis of such a report, the Commission should be empowered, by waynsolidated tape provider for equities and ETFs, followed by bonds and finally by derivatives. The selection processes for each CTP should be staggered at regular intervals, with each selection process starting no later than six months after the initiation of the preceding one. Each successive selection process shall start within 6 months regardless of any delays experienced by the preceding process. For shares/ETFs only, the CTP should comprise pre-trade data related to the best bid and offer. ESMA should also require the CTP for shares to be capable ofr a delegated act, to further specify the depth oft least to have the technical capabilities to consolidate and display pre- trade data to the taperelated to the first five layers of order books.
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36b – point a – point i
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36b – point a – point i
(i) thAt a minimum the five best bids and offers with corresponding volumes; and timestamps, limited to pre-trade transparency data for shares. For auction systems, that also means the price at which the auction trading system would best satisfy its trading algorithm and the volume that participants in that system would potentially execute at that price;
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36b a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36b a (new)
(36b a)“market data” means pre-trade and post-trade data generated as a by- product from the primary function of trading venues operating a multilateral system as defined in Article 4(1)(19) of Directive2014/65/EU and data published by APAs in accordance with the requirements set forth in Article 64 of Directive 2014/65/EU.;
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 6
Article 1 – paragraph 6
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 11
Article 11
Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 6 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 6 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 11
Article 11
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 7
Article 1 – paragraph 7
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 13 – paragraph 3 – first subparagraph
Article 13 – paragraph 3 – first subparagraph
3. ESMA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to: (a) specify what constitutes a reasonable commercial basis, as well as the content, format and terminology of the reasonable commercial basis information that trading venues, APAs, CTPs and systematic internalisers have to make available to the public; and (b) specify the frequency, contact details and format of the information to be provided to the competent authorities and ESMA in accordance with paragraph 3.
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 6 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 6 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 13 – paragraph 1 and 2
Article 13 – paragraph 1 and 2
(6 a) Article 13 paragraph 1 and 2 are replaced by the following: 1. Market operators and investment firms operating a trading venue, APAs, CTPs and systematic internalisers shall make the information published in accordance with Articles 3, 4 and 6 to 11Article 4,Articles 6 to 11, and Articles 14, 20, 21, 27g and 27h, available to the public on a reasonable commercial basis and ensure non- discriminatory access to the information. Such information shall be madeMarket operators and investment firms operating a trading venue, APAs and systematic internalisers shall make such information available free of charge 15 minutes after publication. 2. ThProviding data on a reasonable Ccommission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 50 clarifying what constitutes a reasonable commercial basis to make information public as referred to in paragraph 1.ercial basis means that the price of market data shall be based on the long term cost incremental cost of producing and disseminating such data and may include a reasonable margin not exceeding inflation. Providing data on a reasonable commercial basis furthermore means that the price of market data shall not be based on the value generated by the data user. In this respect Art. 86 (2) of Delegated Regulation2017/565 and Art 8 (2) of Delegated Regulation shall not apply. 2a.Market operators and investment firms operating a trading venue, APAs, CTPs and systematic internalisers shall, upon request, provide the competent authorities and ESMA with information on the actual costs of producing and disseminating market data including the margins; "
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 7 b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 7 b (new)
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 13 – new paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 13 – new paragraph 3 a (new)
(3 a) ESMA shall develop a cost benchmark which defines the costs of producing and disseminating market data as a by-product of the trading activity and what constitutes a reasonable margin that market operators and investment firms operating a trading venue, APAs, CTPs and systematic internalisers shall follow to comply with Article 13 (2).
Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 7 c (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 7 c (new)
(3 b) ESMA shall assess the development in market data costs every second year to measure the adequacy of the rules as well as compliance with the rules. Following this assessment, ESMA shall develop recommendations on whether additional measures must be introduced.
Amendment 328 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 10
Article 1 – paragraph 10
Reguation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 22a – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 22a – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Regulated markets or MTFs whose average daily trading volume of shares represents less than 1 % of the average daily trading volume of the Union shall not be required to provide market data to the CTP;
Amendment 333 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 10
Article 1 – paragraph 10
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 22a – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 22a – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Regulated markets or MTFs whose average daily trading volume of shares exceeds 1 % of the average trading volume of the Union shall not be required to provide market data to the CTP if: (i) the regulated market is not part of a group comprising or having close links with a regulated market that would be above the 1% threshold of the total value of equity value traded within the EU; or (ii) the regulated market accounts for equal to or more than 85% of the average annual traded volume of shares that were first admitted to trading on the regulated market. ESMA shall publish on its website a list of regulated markets exempted from providing market data to the CTP and shall update that list regularly.
Amendment 346 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 10
Article 1 – paragraph 10
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 22b – paragraph 1
Article 22b – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall set up an expert stakeholder group by [OP add 3 months as of entry into force] to provide advice on the quality and the substance of market data, the common interpretation of market data and the quality of the transmission protocol referred to in Article 22a(1). The expert group shall have broad representation, including users of the data: buy and sell-side firms. The expert stakeholder group shall provide advice on a yearly basis. That advice shall be made public.
Amendment 355 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 10
Article 1 – paragraph 10
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 22b – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 22b – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. ESMA shall be empowered to develop regulatory technical standards providing the framework for the creation of a separate governance body mandated to oversee data quality. This will include i) data standard development ii) real-time monitoring of data contribution iii) disciplinary actions: fining and sanctioning powers
Amendment 361 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 11 c (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 11 c (new)
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 26 – paragraph 4
Article 26 – paragraph 4
Amendment 364 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 27d a (new) – Paragraph 1
Article 27d a (new) – Paragraph 1
1. By [OP insert date 3 months as of entry into forcethree months after the date of entry into force of the delegated act under Article 22b(2)], ESMA shall organise a selection procedure for the appointment of the CTP for a five year term. ESMA shall organise a separate selection procedure for each of the following asset classes: shares, exchange traded funds, bonds and derivatives (or relevant subclasses of derivatives)asset class prioritising shares and ETFs over bonds and derivatives. Each selection procedure shall be initiated no later than six months following the initiation of the preceding one.
Amendment 371 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 27da – paragraph 2 - introductory part
Article 27da – paragraph 2 - introductory part
2. For each of the asset classes referred to in paragraph 1, ESMA shall assessselect the applicant for subsequent authorisations on the basis of the following criteria:
Amendment 372 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 27da – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
Article 27da – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(b a) the ability to receive, consolidate and disseminate pre-trade and post-trade market data for shares, up to the first five layers of the orders book, and post-trade data for ETFs, bonds and derivatives;
Amendment 374 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 27da – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 27da – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the adequacy of the governance structure of the applicants in line with the RTS to be developed by ESMA referenced in Article 22b(1);
Amendment 375 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 27da – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 27da – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) the adequacy of speed at which the applicants can disseminate core market data;
Amendment 376 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 27da – paragraph 2 – point e
Article 27da – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) the capacitypropriateness of the applicant’s to disseminate goodmethods and arrangements to ensure data quality data;
Amendment 377 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 27da – paragraph 2 – point f
Article 27da – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) the reasonable level of total expenditure needed by the applicants to develop the consolidated tape and the costs of operating the consolidated tape on an ongoing basis;
Amendment 379 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 27da – paragraph 2 – point g
Article 27da – paragraph 2 – point g
(g) the level of the fees that the applicant intends to charge to the different types of users of the core market data; their proportionality to the costs incurred for running the CTP, as well as the simplicity of its fee and licensing models; and the applicant’s ultimate ability to cover costs and generate a reasonable margin in line with Article 13 RCB which applies to other types of data providers;
Amendment 382 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 27da – paragraph 2 – point i
Article 27da – paragraph 2 – point i
(i) the storage medium the applicants will use for the storage of historic dataappropriateness of the arrangements in place to preserve records for the purposed of Article 27ha(3);
Amendment 383 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 27da – paragraph 2 – point j
Article 27da – paragraph 2 – point j
(j) the protocols the applicants will use to prevent and address outagesability to ensure regularity resilience and business continuity.
Amendment 386 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 27da – paragraph 3
Article 27da – paragraph 3
Amendment 394 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 27da – paragraph 3a (new)
Article 27da – paragraph 3a (new)
3 a. The selection of the CTP for shares and ETFs shall, in addition to the criteria in paragraph 2 of this Article, consider the revenue redistribution scheme whereby the market data contributor should only receive a remuneration based on the costs it has incurred in generating the data and providing it to the CTP, and in particular the formula, applicable to smaller regulated markets that decide to voluntarily opt in to the mandatory contribution of market data, in accordance with Article 22a(2b). This revenue shall be distributed in accordance with Article 27h(1)(c), and in a manner commensurate to the level of contribution to the price formation process of market data contributed in accordance with Article 22a.
Amendment 395 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 27da – paragraph 4
Article 27da – paragraph 4
Amendment 403 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 27da – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 27da – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. ESMA shall adopt a fully reasoned decision selecting the entity per asset class, deemed suitable for operating the consolidated tapes and inviting them to submit an application for authorisation within six months from the initiation of the selection procedure referred to in paragraph 1.