BETA

55 Amendments of Isabel BENJUMEA BENJUMEA related to 2022/0051(COD)

Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) In its Communication on a Strong Social Europe for Just Transition75 , the Commission committed to upgrading Europe’s social market-based economy to achieve a just transition to sustainability. This Directive will also contribute to the European Pillar of Social Rights, which promotes rights ensuring fair working conditions. It forms part of the EU policies and strategies relating to the promotion of decent work worldwide, including in global value chains, as referred to in the Commission Communication on decent work worldwide76 . __________________ 75 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – A Strong Social Europe for Just Transitions (COM/2020/14 final). 76 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee on decent work worldwide for a global just transition and a sustainable recovery, COM(2022) 66 final.
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) Existing international standards on responsible business conduct specify that companies should protect human rights and set out how they should address the protection of the environment across their operations and value chains. The United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights79 recognise the responsibility of companies to exercise human rights due diligence by identifying, preventing and mitigating the adverse impacts of their operations on human rights and by accounting for how they address those impacts. Those Guiding Principles state that businesses should avoid infringing human rights and should address adverse human rights impacts that they have caused, contributed to or are linked with in their own operations, subsidiaries and through their direct and indirect business relationships. __________________ 79 United Nations’ “Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ Framework”, 2011, available at https://www.ohchr.org/documents/publicati ons/guidingprinciplesbusinesshr_en.pdf.
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) According to the Commission Communication on forging a climate- resilient Europe89 presenting the Union Strategy on Adaptation to climate change, new investment and policy decisions should be climate-informed and future- proof, including for larger businesses managing value chains. This Directive should be consistent with that Strategy. Similarly, there should be consistency with the Commission Directive […] amending Directive 2013/36/EU as regards supervisory powers, sanctions, third- country branches, and environmental, social and governance risks (Capital Requirements Directive)90 , which sets out clear requirements for banks’ governance rules including knowledge about environmental, social and governance risks at board of directors level. __________________ 89 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Forging a climate-resilient Europe – the new EU Strategy on Adaptation to Climate Change (COM/2021/82 final), available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2021:82:FIN. 90 OJ C […], […], p. […].
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) Companies should take appropriate steps to set up and carry out due diligence measures, with respect to their own operations, their subsidiaries, as well as their established direct and indirect business relationships throughout their value chains in accordance with the provisions of this Directive. This Directive should not require companies to guarantee, in all circumstances, that adverse impacts will never occur or that they will be stopped. For example with respect to business relationships where the adverse impact results from State intervention, the company might not be in a position to arrive at such results. Therefore, the main obligations in this Directive should be ‘obligations of means’. The company should take the appropriate measures which can reasonably be expected to result in prevention or minimisation of the adverse impact under the circumstances of the specific case. Account should be taken of the specificities of the company’s value chain, sector or geographical area in which its value chain partners operate, the company’s power to influence its direct and indirect business relationships, and whether the company could increase its power of influence.
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) The value chain should cover activities related to the production of a good or provision of services by a company, including the development of the product or the service and the use and disposal of the product as well as the related activities of established business relationships of the company. It should encompass upstream established direct and indirect business relationships that design, extract, manufacture, transport, store and supply raw material, products, parts of products, or provide services to the company that are necessary to carry out the company’s activities, and also downstream relationships, including established direct and indirect business relationships, that use or receive products, parts of products or services from the company up to the end of life of the product, including inter alia the distribution of the product to retailers, the transport and storage of the product, dismantling of the product, its recycling, composting or landfilling.
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
(20) In order to allow companies to properly identify the adverse impacts in their value chain and to make it possible for them to exercise appropriate leverage, the due diligence obligations should be limited in this Directive to established direct business relationships. For the purpose of this Directive, established business relationships should mean such direct and indirect business relationships which are, or which are expected to be lasting, in view of their intensity and duration and which do not represent a negligible or ancillary part of the value chain. The nature of business relationships as “established” should be reassessed periodically, and at least every 12 months. If the direct business relationship of a company is established, then all linked indirect business relationships should also be considered as established regarding that company.
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 35
(35) In order to reflect the full range of options for the company in cases where potential impacts could not be addressed by the described prevention or minimisation measures, this Directive should also refer to the possibility for the company to seek to conclude a contract with the indirect business partner, with a view to achieving compliance with the company’s code of conduct or a prevention action plan, and conduct appropriate measures to verify compliance of the indirect business relationship with the contract.deleted
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 36
(36) In order to ensure that prevention and mitigation of potential adverse impacts is effective, companies should prioritize engagement with business relationships in the value chain, instead of terminating the business relationship, as a last resort action after attempting at preventing and mitigating adverse potential impacts without success. However, the Directive should also, for cases where potential adverse impacts could not be addressed by the described prevention or mitigation measures, refer to the obligation for companies to refrain from entering into new or extending existing relations with the partner in question and, where the law governing their relations so entitles them to, to either temporarily suspend commercial relationships with the partner in question, while pursuing prevention and minimisation efforts, if there is reasonable expectation that these efforts are to succeed in the short-term; or to terminate the business relationship with respect to the activities concerned if the potential adverse impact is severe. In order to allow companies to fulfil that obligation, Member States should provide for the availability of an option to terminate the business relationship in contracts governed by their laws. It is possible that prevention of adverse impacts at the level of indirect business relationships requires collaboration with another company, for example a company which has a direct contractual relationship with the supplier. In some instances, such collaboration could be the only realistic way of preventing adverse impacts, in particular, where the indirect business relationship is not ready to enter into a contract with the company. In these instances, the company should collaborate with the entity which can most effectively prevent or mitigate adverse impacts at the level of the indirect business relationship while respecting competition law.
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 37
(37) As regards direct and indirect business relationships, industry cooperation, industry schemes and multi- stakeholder initiatives can help create additional leverage to identify, mitigate, and prevent adverse impacts. Therefore it should be possible for companies to rely on such initiatives to support the implementation of their due diligence obligations laid down in this Directive to the extent that such schemes and initiatives are appropriate to support the fulfilment of those obligations. Companies could assess, at their own initiative, the alignment of these schemes and initiatives with the obligations under this Directive. In order to ensure full information on such initiatives, the Directive should also refer to the possibility for the Commission and the Member States to facilitate the dissemination of information on such schemes or initiatives and their outcomes. The Commission, in collaboration with Member States, may issue guidance for assessing the fitness of industry schemes and multi-stakeholder initiatives.
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 40
(40) In order to reflect the full range of options for the company in cases where actual impacts could not be addressed by the described measures, this Directive should also refer to the possibility for the company to seek to conclude a contract with the indirect business partner, with a view to achieving compliance with the company’s code of conduct or a corrective action plan, and conduct appropriate measures to verify compliance of the indirect business relationship with the contract.deleted
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 57
(57) As regards damages occurring at the level of established indirect business relationships, the liability of the company should be subject to specific conditions. The company should not be liable if it carried out specific due diligence measures. However, it should not be exonerated from liability through implementing such measures in case it was unreasonable to expect that the action actually taken, including as regards verifying compliance, would be adequate to prevent, mitigate, bring to an end or minimise the adverse impact. In addition, in the assessment of the existence and extent of liability, due account is to be taken of the company’s efforts, insofar as they relate directly to the damage in question, to comply with any remedial action required of them by a supervisory authority, any investments made and any targeted support provided as well as any collaboration with other entities to address adverse impacts in its value chains.deleted
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 59
(59) As regards civil liability rules, the civil liability of a company for damages arising due to its failure to carry out adequate due diligence should be without prejudice to civil liability of its subsidiaries or the respective civil liability of direct and indirect business partners in the value chain. Also, the civil liability rules under this Directive should be without prejudice to Union or national rules on civil liability related to adverse human rights impacts or to adverse environmental impacts that provide for liability in situations not covered by or providing for stricter liability than this Directive.
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The nature of business relationships as ‘established’ shall be reassessed periodically, and at least every 12 months.
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. This Directive shall not constitute grounds for reducing the level of protection of human rights or of protection of the environment or the protection of the climate provided for by the law of Member States at the time of the adoption of this Directive.
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 306 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the company had more than 51000 employees on average and had a net worldwide turnover of more than EUR 15300 million in the last financial year for which annual financial statements have been prepared;
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 313 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b – introductory part
(b) the company did not reach the thresholds under point (a), but had more than 2500 employees on average and had a net worldwide turnover of more than EUR 450 million in the last financial year for which annual financial statements have been prepared, provided that at least 50% of this net turnover was generated in one or more of the following sectors:
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 328 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) generated a net turnover of more than EUR 450 million but not more than EUR 150 million in the Union in the financial year preceding the last financial year, provided that at least 50% of its net worldwide turnover was generated in one or more of the sectors listed in paragraph 1, point (b).
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 329 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. For the purposes of paragraph 1, the number of part-time employees shall be calculated ononsidered, representing 50% of a full- time equivalent basisemployee. Temporary agency workers shall be included in the calculation of the number of employees in the same way as if they were workers employed directly for the same period of time by the company.
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 337 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iv – indent 2
— an investment firm as defined in Article 4(1), point (1), of Directive 2014/65/EU the European Parliament and of the Council112 ; __________________ 112 Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU (OJ L 173, 12.6.2014, p. 349).deleted
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 338 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iv – indent 3
— an alternative investment fund manager (AIFM) as defined in Article 4(1), point (b), of Directive 2011/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (2), including a manager of Euveca under Regulation (EU) No 345/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council113 , a manager of EuSEF under Regulation (EU) No 346/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council114 and a manager of ELTIF under Regulation (EU) 2015/760 of the European Parliament and of the Council115 ; __________________ 113 Regulation (EU) No 345/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2013 on European venture capital funds (OJ L 115, 25.4.2013, p. 1). 114 Regulation (EU) No 346/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2013 on European social entrepreneurship funds (OJ L 115, 25.4.2013, p. 18). 115 Regulation (EU) 2015/760 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2015 on European long-term investment funds (OJ L 123, 19.5.2015, p. 98).deleted
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 340 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iv – indent 4
— an undertaking for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) management company as defined Article 2(1), point (b), of Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council116 ; __________________ 116 Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) (OJ L 302, 17.11.2009, p. 32).deleted
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 344 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iv – indent 9
— an alternative investment fund (AIF) managed by an AIFM as defined in Article 4(1), point (b), of Directive 2011/61/EU or an AIF supervised under the applicable national law;deleted
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 347 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iv – indent 10
— UCITS in the meaning of Article 1(2) of Directive 2009/65/EC;deleted
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 351 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(a a) 'investee company' means a company in which an institutional investor or asset manager invests through transferable securities or money market instruments as defined in Section C Annex I of Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU, which is not a controlled undertaking;
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 354 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a c (new)
(a c) 'institutional investor' means an entity as defined by Article 2(e)of Directive 2007/36/EC, within the scope of Article 2 of this Directive;
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 355 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a b (new)
(a b) 'asset manager' means an entity as defined by Article 2(f) of Directive 2007/36/EC, within the scope of Article 2 of this Directive;
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 369 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e – point i
(i) with whom the company has a commercial agreement or to whom the companyan agreement to provides financing, insurance or reinsurance,, or
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 375 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e – subparagraph 1 a (new)
The relationship between an investee company and an asset manager and/or an institutional investor shall not be considered a business relationship for the purpose of this Directive. The provision of services within the meaning of section A (1) to (5) and section B of Annex I of Directive2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU shall not be considered a business relationship for the purpose of this Directive. The provisions of services by a UCITS management company as defined in Article 2(1), point (b), of Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council to a UCITS in the meaning of Article 1(2)of Directive 2009/65/EC or by an alternative investment fund manager (AIFM) as defined in Article 4(1), point(b), of Directive 2011/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council to an alternative investment fund (AIF) managed by an AIFM as defined in Article 4(1), point (b), of Directive 2011/61/EU or an AIF supervised under the applicable national law shall not be considered a business relationship for the purpose of this Directive.
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 384 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) ‘established business relationship’ means a business relationship, whether direct or indirect, which is, or which is expected to be lasting, in view of its intensity or duration and which does not represent a negligible or merely ancillary part of the value chain;
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 385 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) ‘established business relationship’ means a direct business relationship, whether direct or indirect, which is, or which is expected to be lasting, in view of its intensity or duration and which does not represent a negligible or merely ancillary part of the value chain;.
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 387 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
(f a) The relationship between an investee company and an asset manager and/or an institutional investor shall not be considered an established business relationship. The provision of services within the meaning of section A (1) to (5) and section B of Annex I of Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU shall not be considered an established business relationship for the purpose of this Directive. The provision of services by a UCITS management company as defined in Article 2(1), point (b), of Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council to a UCITS in the meaning of Article 1(2) of Directive2009/65/EC or by an alternative investment fund manager (AIFM)as defined in Article 4(1), point (b), of Directive 2011/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council to an alternative investment fund (AIF) managed by an AIFM as defined in Article4(1), point (b), of Directive 2011/61/EU or an AIF supervised under the applicable national law shall not be considered an established business relationship for the purpose of this Directive.
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 393 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) ‘value chain’ means activities related to the production of goods or the provision of services by a company, including the development of the product or the service and the use and disposal of the product as well as the related activities of upstream and downstream established business relationships of the company. As regards companies within the meaning of point (a)(iv), ‘value chain’ with respect to the provision of these specific services shall only include the activities of the direct clients receiving such loan, credit, and other financial services and of other companies belonging to the same group whose activities are linked to the contract in question. The value chain of such regulated financial undertakings does not cover SMEs receiving loan, credit, financing, insurance or reinsurance of such entitiesfinancing, insurance or reinsurance. The value chain of such regulated financial undertakings does not cover SMEs, natural person and suppliers, neither the relationship between an investee company and an asset manager and/or an institutional investor;
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 478 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure that the companies update their due diligence policy annualregularly.
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 484 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Paragraph 1 and 2 shall not apply to a regulated financial undertaking complying with Article 4(1) of Regulation(EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 on sustainability- related disclosures in the financial services sector pursuant to Article 4(3), Article 4(4) or on a voluntary basis.
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 560 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) make necessary investments, such as into management or production processes and infrastructures, to comply with paragraph 1;deleted
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 574 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. As regards potential adverse impacts that could not be prevented or adequately mitigated by the measures in paragraph 2, the company may seek to conclude a contract with a partner with whom it has an indirect relationship, with a view to achieving compliance with the company’s code of conduct or a prevention action plan. When such a contract is concluded, paragraph 4 shall apply.deleted
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 579 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Contractual assurances must be proportional, reasonable and adequate to the nature of the companies integrated in the business relationship, preserving the viability and competitiveness of such companies;
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 580 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
As regards potential adverse impacts within the meaning of paragraph 1 that could not be prevented or adequately mitigated by the measures in paragraphs 2, 3 and 4, the company shall be required to refrain from entering into new or extending existing relations with the partner in connection with or in the value chain of which the impact has arisen and shall, where the law governing their relations so entitles them to, take the following actions: (a) relations with the partner in question, while pursuing prevention and minimisation efforts, if there is reasonable expectation that these efforts will succeed in the short-term; (b) terminate the business relationship with respect to the activities concerned if the potential adverse impact is severe.deleted temporarily suspend commercial
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 592 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
Member States shall provide for the availability of an option to terminate the business relationship in contracts governed by their laws.deleted
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 593 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 6
6. By way of derogation from paragraph 5, point (b), when companies referred to in Article 3, point (a)(iv), provide credit, loan or other financial services, they shall not be required to terminate the credit, loan or other financial service contract when this can be reasonably expected to cause substantial prejudice to the entity to whom that service is being provided.deleted
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 630 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) seek proportional, adequate and reasonable contractual assurances from a direct partner with whom it has an established business relationship that it will ensure compliance with the code of conduct and, as necessary, a corrective action plan, including by seeking corresponding contractual assurances from its partners, to the extent that they are part of the value chain (contractual cascading). When such contractual assurances are obtained, paragraph 5 shall apply.
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 634 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point d
(d) make necessary investments, such as into management or production processes and infrastructures to comply with paragraphs 1, 2 and 3;deleted
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 649 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 4
4. As regards actual adverse impacts that could not be brought to an end or adequately mitigated by the measures in paragraph 3, the company may seek to conclude a contract with a partner with whom it has an indirect relationship, with a view to achieving compliance with the company’s code of conduct or a corrective action plan. When such a contract is concluded, paragraph 5 shall apply.deleted
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 659 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
As regards actual adverse impacts within the meaning of paragraph 1 that could not be brought to an end or the extent of which could not be minimised by the measures provided for in paragraphs 3, 4 and 5, the company shall refrain from entering into new or extending existing relations with the partner in connection to or in the value chain of which the impact has arisen and shall, where the law governing their relations so entitles them to, take one of the following actions:deleted
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 665 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) temporarily suspend commercial relationships with the partner in question, while pursuing efforts to bring to an end or minimise the extent of the adverse impact, ordeleted
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 667 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) terminate the business relationship with respect to the activities concerned, if the adverse impact is considered severe.deleted
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 671 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
Member States shall provide for the availability of an option to terminate the business relationship in contracts governed by their laws.deleted
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 673 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 7
7. By way of derogation from paragraph 6, point (b), when companies referred to in Article 3, point (a)(iv), provide credit, loan or other financial services, they shall not be required to terminate the credit, loan or other financial service contract, when this can be reasonably expected to cause substantial prejudice to the entity to whom that service is being provided.deleted
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 726 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that companies carry out periodic assessments of their own operations and measures, those of their subsidiaries and, where related to the value chains of the company, those of their established business relationships, to monitor the effectiveness of the identification, prevention, mitigation, bringing to an end and minimisation of the extent of human rights and environmental adverse impacts. Such assessments shall be based, where appropriate, on qualitative and quantitative indicators and be carried out at least every 12 monthsregularly and whenever there are reasonable grounds to believe that significant new risks of the occurrence of those adverse impacts may arise. The due diligence policy shall be updated in accordance with the outcome of those assessments.
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 740 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 2 a (new)
This Article shall not apply to a regulated financial undertaking complying with Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector pursuant to Article 4(3), Article 4(4) or on a voluntary basis.
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 835 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph 3
3. When pecuniary sanctions are imposed, they shall be based on the company’s turnover.deleted
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 882 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 3
3. The civil liability of a company for damages arising under this provision shall be without prejudice to the civil liability of its subsidiaries or of any direct and indirect business partners in the value chain.
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 894 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. This Article will not apply to institutional investors and asset managers regarding adverse impacts caused or contributed to by investee companies. This Article will also not apply to services within the meaning of section A (1) to (5) and section B of Annex I of Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU.
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 903 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 24
Member States shall ensure that companies applying for public support certify that no sanctions have been imposed on them for a failure to comply with the obligations of this Directive.Article 24 deleted Public support
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 906 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 25
1. when fulfilling their duty to act in the best interest of the company, directors of companies referred to in Article 2(1) take into account the consequences of their decisions for sustainability matters, including, where applicable, human rights, climate change and environmental consequences, including in the short, medium and long term. 2. their laws, regulations and administrative provisions providing for a breach of directors’ duties apply also to the provisions of this Article.Article 25 deleted Directors’ duty of care Member States shall ensure that, Member States shall ensure that
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON