8 Amendments of Bert-Jan RUISSEN related to 2019/2162(INI)
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas there is a strong scientific consensus that MPAs arcan be beneficial to fisheries because of their spillover effect and their positive effects on recruitment;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to continue to support plans to improve selectivity and to take into account the results of studies showing the detrimental impacts of fishing techniques such as bottom- contacting gear or fish aggregating devices (FADs) by strongly limiting their use;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that the EU should go beyond current fisheries management practices and promote a transition towards low-impact fisheries in order to rebuild fish stocks and restore marine ecosystems;
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Considers that MSY should not be the only indicator relating to EU fisheries management and that maximum economic yield (MEY) should also be used;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. WelcomesTakes note of the Commission’s proposal, in its 2030 Biodiversity Strategy, to have at least 30 % of sea area in the EU protected;
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Calls on the Commission to conduct an impact assessment of this proposal;
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls for half of that area, meaningTakes note of the Commission's proposal to have 150 % of European waters, to benefit from a high level of protection, which includes areas where all catches and any economic activities are prohibited (no- take zones), areas where only the most destructive fishing techniques, such as bottom-contacting gear, are banned, and fish stock recovery areas, as provided for under the CFP;