6 Amendments of Malik AZMANI related to 2023/2729(RSP)
Amendment 39 #
Paragraph 4
Amendment 64 #
Paragraph 9
9. Reiterates its call for OLAF reports on the Agency to be made public in cases of overriding public interest in disclosure and, in all cases,While recognising that the EU Courts established a general presumption of non-disclosure of public access for documents pertaining to ongoing OLAF investigations,1a reiterates its call for the relevant Members of Parliament to be given confidential access to suchrelevant reports within a reasonable period of timeinto the Agency in order to allow them to effectively carry out democratic scrutiny and hold the Agency to account for its actions, in particular for politically important matters; believes that the current rules need to be revised to ensure that Parliament is fully informed in its role as policymaker and co-legislator, in particular regarding its budgetary powers; __________________ 1a The General Court has stated that the provisions concerning confidentiality in Regulation 883/2013 justify a general presumption of non-disclosure of documents related to OLAF’s investigations. The Court concluded that “generalised access, on the basis of Regulation No 1049/2001, to documents in OLAF’s file, while OLAF’s investigation procedure is still ongoing, would, in principle, undermine the effective conduct of the investigation”
Amendment 76 #
Paragraph 13
13. Expresses severe concern regarding the serious and persistent allegations made against Greek authorities in relation to pushbacks and violence against migrants; is convinced that respect for the principles and values of the Union must be the condition sine qua non for Frontex to commit to a joint operation with a Member State; is further convinced that, should a Member State be unable to respect those principles and values, then the Agency should scale down and repurpose its operations towards monitoring activities in the light of Article 46 of its mandate, while; recognises the FRO’s opinion that maintaining itsa Frontex presence on the ground in order not to leave a vacuummay contribute to upholding the fundamental rights during a joint operation; regrets that the Agency has so far refrained from scaling down or repurposing its operations in Greece; repurposing its operations in Greece so far, in order to avoid serious violations of fundamental rights or international protection obligations from taking place ;
Amendment 86 #
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes the Agency’s decision to scale down its activities in Lithuania in July 2022 in the light of the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on 30 June 2022 as regards the Lithuanian law and decrees on asylum and migration10 ; notes that the Agency still has officers on the ground supporting national authorities with border checks at selected border crossing points and assisting return- related activities in Lithuania; recommends that the Agency take a more proactivestrategic approach to protecting the Union’s principles and values rather than awain line with CJEU rulings; __________________ 10 Judgment of the Court of Justice of 30 June 2022, M.A. v Valsybès sienos apsaugos tarnyba, C-72/22PPU, ECLI:EU:C:2022:505.
Amendment 91 #
Paragraph 15
15. Recalls that, although the Agency withdrew from operations in Hungary in January 2021 following a clear CJEU ruling in December 202011 , it continues to support Hungarian authorities in carrying out returns; reiterates the FSWG’s calls on the executive director to immediately suspendreassess support for return-related operations from Hungary; __________________ 11 Judgment of the Court of Justice of 17 December 2020, Commission v Hungary, C-808/18, ECLI:EU:C:2020:1029.
Amendment 106 #
Paragraph 18
18. Considers that the absence of an EU-level search and rescue mission has led otherNotes the activity of civil society and non- governmental organisations to fill the gap in providing search and rescue capacity by member states; is concerned about the increasing number of attempts to criminalise such actions, further limiting the possibilities for those in distress at sea to be rescued;