14 Amendments of Massimo CASANOVA related to 2020/2273(INI)
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas EU fishing, aquaculture and processing sectors subscribe to the highest standards of environmental and social sustainability throughout the entire value chain, including labour rights and animal health and welfare, and provide high-quality seafood products, thus playing a fundamental role in food security and nutritional wellbeing to an ever increasing population; whereas by restricting fishing, a number of UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and two pillars of the CFP, namely social and economic sustainability, are jeopardised;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas EU fishers and fish farmers play an essential role across the Union in safeguarding territorial identity, cultural traditions, food security, jobs and incomes and must continue providing social and economic support to many coastal , riparian, island, inland and lakeside communities;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Emphasises that managing protected marine areas in a manner consistent with the needs of the fishers who traditionally operate in the areas concerned is more efficient and brings benefits for biodiversity;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Emphasises the importance of managing MPAs on the basis of integrated policies which focus on both the sea and coastlines, monitoring areas of particular natural importance or interest and, at the same time, protecting and safeguarding in a sustainable manner the economic and social fabric of the territories in question;
Amendment 74 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that strengthening and efficiently implementing existing closed areas or, where necessary, stepping up checks in those areas, would be much more efficient and meaningful;
Amendment 103 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses the importance of proper and inclusive spatial planning, which takes sufficiently into account the sustainable development of fisheries and aquaculture, giving priority to the most vulnerable and socially disadvantaged and pointing to the need for allocating space to existing and new fishing grounds and aquaculture farms;
Amendment 127 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Expresses its deep regret over the obvious discriminatory treatment of fisheries compared to that of agriculture; welcomes the fact the proposed strategy outlines that ‘the progress towards the targets will be under constant review, and adjustment if needed, to mitigate against undue impact on biodiversity, food security and farmers’ competitiveness’; notes, however, that this sentence, which is a necessary safety net, is clearly discriminatory since it fails to mention fishers and aquaculture producers; notes, further, that individual operators have suffered discriminatory treatment compared to that of farmers as regards access to specific forms of financial support;
Amendment 136 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Strongly denounces the excessive focus on fishing and its connection with the failure to achieve the good ecological status in marine ecosystems and the lack of consideration given to other sources of pressure and degradation, such as oil, gas, dredging or shipping, the impact of activities on land and, not least, the rise in water temperatures, all of which impose stresses on ecosystems and fish stocks;
Amendment 152 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses that gears and techniques should not be demonised; recalls that bottom trawling can also enhance biodiversity in certain sandy seabeds and that it is one of the most common and most regulated fishing gears in Europe; stresses that it is the only viable way to catch many key species that we eat, such as all demersal species, catches of which are regulated at EU level, and that almost all of them are fished at MSY levels and that many of them are Marine Stewardship Council certified;
Amendment 158 #
15. Highlights the need to simplify administrative procedures on aquaculture and fishing activities, especially when in Natura 2000 areas, with a view to ensuring that no additional costs and administrative burdens are imposed on fishing undertakings, and asks the Commission to update its guidance on ‘Aquaculture and Natura 2000 areas’;
Amendment 173 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Stresses the importance of adequate funding through the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and aquaculture policy in order to achieve the EU’s goals on biodiversity and ensure that the financial burden does not fall on fishers;
Amendment 176 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Calls for EU funding for the fishing industry to be used to improve the resilience and economic stability of fishing enterprises, in particular traditional coastal fleets and small-scale fishers, by providing better access to credit, micro-financing, insurance and investment; emphasises the need to ensure that individual Member States are able to decide on the percentage of EU funding to be used for that purpose;
Amendment 177 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 19 b (new)
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19b. Points out that the key objectives of the Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 are also valid for agreements with third countries and that partnership agreements of this kind should therefore be revised accordingly;
Amendment 195 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Emphasises the importance of ensuring an adequate and fair income to fishers and farmers, as well as a level playing field with imported food; points out that stricter standards on the traceability of fishery products could help to achieve that aim;