Activities of Mick WALLACE related to 2022/2079(INI)
Shadow opinions (1)
OPINION Critical technologies for security and defence: state of play and future challenges
Amendments (11)
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines that the EU’s defence sector is fragmented, which creates strategic vulnerabilities for the Union, Member States and industry; is concerned about the lack of coordination and calls for more strategic cohesion in security and defence policies at Union level; welcomes, in this context, the Commission’s launch of the European Defence Industry Reinforcement through common Procurement Act (EDIRPA) and encourages the Commission and Member States to take this initiative a step further and strive towards a de facto military union supported by a strongly articulated common market for defence equipment, followed by a review of the Treaties for because the EU contains a wide array of separate strategic cultures and competing defence industries and procurement systems specifically adapted to each of them; underlines that some EU Member States define themselves as neutral in some form and that as such the notion of more EU competences on critical technologies for defence, innovation in defence, and security and defence affairs is problematic and would be a highly undemocratic development within the EU;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Deplores the advance of a militarist agenda in the European Union and the sharp rise in allocation of European public money to militarist projects above social projects in the 2021– 27 Multi-annual Financial Framework wherin funding for law enforcement, border control, military research and development and operations now stands at €43.9bn, 31 times higher than the €1.4bn funding allocation for rights, values and justice; recalls that according to Article 41.2 of the TEU, the operating expenditure arising from actions having military or defence implications must not be charged to the Union budget;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the relevant EU bodies to consolidate EU cooperative frameworks for developing cutting-edge military capabilities in the transport, health, agriculture, environment and climate action sectors and for EU-level legislation to coordinate Member States’ strategies for critical technologies in these fields and to reduce dependencies;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to encourage Member States, in light of the fact that the greatest threat to life on earth is global warming, to review all defence programmes and policy tools, check if they are still fit for purpose, and summarise findings; suggests that the European Defence Agency can provide light touch support and coordination suggestions, including a strategic assessment of tha logical use of funds and summarise findings;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for a more pragmatic and business-oriented approach to military researchpproach to research in the areas of health, transport, agriculture, environment and climate action in order to provide incentives for innovation in military technology, including by reducing or removing barriers to entry into the defence market; related to these fields, further calls for increased support for European companies in emerging technologies to ensure they remain competitive in international markets by relaxing the rules on compliance documentation and by providing tax incentives and stimulating investmentrelevant to these areas;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Underlines the need to stimulate the development of skills for innovation, research and development (R&D), and fundamental research in critical areas related to emerging technologies; calls on the Commission to encourage Member States to establish and fund defence innovation hub in the areas of health, transport, agriculture, environment and climate action, and fundamental research in critical areas related to emerging technologies in these areas;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Is concerned about the EU’s dependence on China for raw materials from third countries and calls on Member States to reduce their vulnerabilities resulting from dependence on non-democratic suppliers of critical technologies and materials, and to enhance defein particular our dependence on the Gulf monarchical dictatorships, and the state of Israel who, according to Amnestry International, are carrying out a system of targeted oppression against the Palestinian people that "amounts to apartheid as prohibited in international law"; notes that Member States could enhance production chains in Europe by localising or near-shoring production;
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 73 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 93 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
Amendment 96 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11