12 Amendments of Roman HAIDER related to 2021/2037(INI)
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that in 2020 China for the first time ranked as the EU’s largest partner for trade in goods, with the trade balance further deteriorating to the EU’s detriment, having the latter a trade deficit with China; highlights that the current EU- China Strategy in place has clearly resulted limited;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Is concerned about the increasingly unbalanced EU-China bilateral economic and trade relationship, which are marked by an asymmetry in market access and the absence of an effective level playing-field able to ensure fair access to the Chinese market for these EU producers and exporters as well as by the opposed social and environmental standards; stresses that rebalancing and a more level playing field are vital to EU interests;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Regrets that the efforts and the tools used by the EU have not resulted in tangible progress on human rights in China, not contributing in the ceasing of the prompt and negative evolution and deterioration of China as an international actor;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Repeats its deep concern about the many barriers that European businesses face when accessing and operating on the Chinese market as well as the unfair trading practices imposed by state-owned enterprises; is worried that China’s ‘dual circulation strategy’ referred to in its 14th Five Year Plan will further deteriorate the business environment for EU companies; highlights again its particular concern about the market distorting practices of Chinese state-owned enterprises, forced technology transfers and data localisation, industrial overcapacity in sectors such as steel and the related dumping of exports, and other unfair trading practices as well as the interferences in the democratic life of the EU by the attempts of Chinese state and non-state actors;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Welcomes the adoption of a proposal for a Regulation on foreign subsidies distorting the internal market; hopes that that this instrument can secure a strong and competitive single market, strengthening the position of the EU and tackling the distortions caused by third countries-especially China- by increasing the level-playing field;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. Recalls that China has not ratified four of the eight core ILO Conventions; condemns the continuous breaches of human and labour rights practiced by China, especially those related to Uighur abuses in Xinjiang region;
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. WelcomesTakes note with big concern of the conclusion at the political level of the EU- China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI); recalls that the CAI has to be considered in the context of a strengthened EU toolbox of unilateral measureswelcomes the suspension of the ratification of the such investment agreement and expects the Commission to consult with the Parliament before taking further steps towards its conclusion; underlines it will thoroughly scrutinise the agreement, including its sustainable development section, and take stock of the human rights context, before determining its position;
Amendment 73 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. In this sense, recalls the arbitrary and unlawful sanctions adopted by the People’s Republic of China against five members of the European Parliament, entities and think tanks, meant as a tool of intimidation; highlights that, due the latter Chinese sanctions, the role of the European Parliament for duly analysing the CAI has been jeopardised and further states that trade and investment relations need to be within the scope of human rights and the broader political relations;
Amendment 94 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the entry into force of the EU-China Agreement on geographical indications, and reiterates the importance of effective implementation of the Agreement.; regrets, nevertheless, that the Commission did not pursue from the beginning a more ambitious agenda by trying to cover a broader number of Geographical Indications;
Amendment 99 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Is highly concerned about the global high dependence on Chinese supply chain that the current COVID19 pandemic has shown; further highlights the need for the EU to swift towards the reshoring and near shoring some strategical productions 1b; _________________ 1b“PostCovid-19 value chains: options for reshoring production back to Europe in a globalised economy”, published in 2020
Amendment 102 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Takes note of the important role that China is taking in the Asia-Pacific region, which has increased even more thanks to the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP); underlines the fact that the RCEP is causing significant geopolitical shifts, challenging also the global position of the EU, by creating the world's largest trading bloc, covering nearly a third of the global economy;