11 Amendments of Marcos ROS SEMPERE related to 2020/2012(INL)
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that the creationdevelopment, the deployment and the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the areas of culture, education and information policy raises and will continue to raise a wide range of ethical issues; stresses that the Union should lead the way towards an ethical AI anchored in European values and ensuring the protection of the fundamental rights within a more democratic, fair and sustainable Europe;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses the need to develop criteria for the development, the deployment and the use of AI in education, media and the cultural and creative sectors, by developing benchmarks for ethically responsible and accepted uses of AI technologies in these areas; underlines that these criteria must be constantly adjusted to the progress in AI technologies and must aim to promote the ultimate common public good and wellness of the society;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Notes that every child enjoys the right to public quality education at all levels; therefore, calls for the development, the deployment and the use of quality AI systems that facilitate and provide quality educational tools for all at all levels and stresses that the deployment of new AI systems into schools should not lead to make a wider digital gap in society;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notices that AI personalised learning systems are increasingly being deployed in schools and universities, which is changing the role of teachers in the learning process to one more of facilitation; stresses thatis transitioning to facilitators and tutors; stresses that when students' curricula reflects this shift it should be reflected in curriculaanchored by human centric values which allow for human control and teachers' supervision;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Stresses that children need special protection measures related to the data that might be gathered by AI technologies, and recalls the need to adopt an ethical regulation to ensure an adequate protection level and privacy standards, in particular with regard to their educational path;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. Notes that there is a need to clarify the concept of arts and cultural and creative works, as well as the role of humans as creators and artists, when AI technologies are involved in the creation of the works; stresses the need to clarify the framework of intellectual property rights applicable to AI-generated works;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Acknowledges the great potential of AI in the areas of information and media; underlines that, if not regulated, itAI technologies might have also ethically adverse effects by spreading fake news, creating information bubbles and exploiting biases incorporated into AI algorithmexploiting bias in data and algorithms that may lead to disseminating disinformation, creating information bubbles and spreading fake news;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises that education should empower citizens to develop new forms of critical thinking, including; calls for the establishment of digital literacy tools at all levels of education which include ‘algorithm and data awareness’ and the ability to reflect on the impact of AI on information, knowledge, and decision- making;
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Emphasises the importance for transparency and accountability of algorithms used by media streaming companies, in order to ensure access to culturally and linguistically diverse content; stresses that such algorithms should be designed in such a way that they do notreflect the cultural diversity of our societies and avoid privilegeing specific works by limiting their ‘personalised’ suggestions to the most popular works;
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Notes that AI systems developed, deployed and used in the Union need to reflect its cultural diversity and its multilingualism;
Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that the use of AI technologies is spreading rapidly into sports competitions; therefore, it is increasingly raising questions of fair competition in sport; stresses that this area needs a regulatory framework. which applies ethical and human centric criteria in their development and use;