12 Amendments of Jean-Lin LACAPELLE related to 2020/2012(INL)
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Stresses that the personal data of European citizens should preferably be processed in Europe.
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 72 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Stresses that where European public funds contribute to the development or implementation of an algorithmic system of a consortium comprising a non-European company, the code and the non-personal data generated should be public by default.
Amendment 74 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Stresses that where non-European public funds contribute to the development or implementation in Europe of an algorithmic system, the code and the non-personal data generated should be public by default.
Amendment 84 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Underlines the importance of ensuring that the interests of marginalised and vulnerable consumers and groupEuropean citizens are adequately taken into account and represented in any future regulatory framework; notes that for the purpose of analysing the impacts of algorithmic systems on consumers, access to data should be extended to appropriate parties notably independent researchers, media and civiluniversity or society organisationntific researchers, while fully respecting Union data protection and privacy law; recalls the importance of training and giving basic skills to consumers to deal with algorithmic systems in order to protect them from potential risks and detriment of their rights;
Amendment 97 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
Amendment 106 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Calls on the Commission and the authorities of the Member States to combat tax evasion and the abuse of a dominant position by non-European companies in Europe active in the market for algorithmic systems;
Amendment 117 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Stresses the need for the authorities to put an end to the practices of massive and systematic profiling or tracking of consumers organised by some players in the advertising industry on the internet or mobile phones; notes that these tools collect very sensitive data about behaviour, interests or health, even from minors and that they are then used by third parties; regrets that the lack of supervision by the authorities strengthens the market power of less ethical players and dissuades some players from offering more ethical solutions that are more favourable to consumers.
Amendment 118 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
Amendment 130 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Demands an update of European competition and public procurement law to promote the emergence of world-class players based in Europe;
Amendment 131 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 13 b (new)
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Calls for measures to encourage global companies to relocate part of their employment, research and digital systems and products to Europe, if they want to benefit from full access to the European market;
Amendment 132 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 13 c (new)
Paragraph 13 c (new)
13c. Calls for respect for European and national preferences, for the development of European territories and employment in the sector of artificial intelligence and robotics; stresses the importance of preventing the takeover of strategic companies by non-European players;