4 Amendments of Karolin BRAUNSBERGER-REINHOLD related to 2022/0277(COD)
Amendment 500 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) guarantee that editors are free to take individual editorial decisions in the exercise of their professional activity, without prejudice to the right of the entity being legally liable for the content to assume a leading editorial role; and
Amendment 519 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. The obligations under this Article shall not apply to media service providers that are micro or small enterprises within the meaning of Article 3 of Directive 2013/34/EU.
Amendment 750 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 17 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Where media service providers consider that very large online platforms have unjustly declined their declaration under paragraph 1, they may ask the respective national authority or self- regulatory body to provide a clarification.
Amendment 752 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2
Article 17 – paragraph 2
2. Where a provider of very large online platform decides to restrict or suspend the provision of its online intermediation services in relation to content or services provided by a media service provider that submitted a declaration pursuant to paragraph 1 of this Article, on the grounds that such content or service is incompatible with its terms and conditions, without that content contributing to a systemic risk referred to in Article 26 of the Regulation (EU) 2022/XXX [Digital Services Act]2065, it shall take all possible measures, to the extent consistent with their obligations under Union law, including Regulation (EU) 2022/XXX [Digital Services Act]2065, to communicate to the media service provider concerned the statement of reasons accompanying that decision, as required by Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1150, prior to the suspension taking effectand to provide the media service provider concerned with an opportunity to reply to the statement of reasons and the additional reasons within 48 hours prior to the restriction or suspension taking effect. During that time the provider of the very large online platform may decide to put a notice on the content or service that is being under inspection. A provider of a very large online platform shall not restrict or suspend the provision of its online intermediation services in relation to content or services provided by a media service provider where that that media service provider has reasonably demonstrated that the content or services in question are in accordance with the national law of the Member State concerned. The media service provider may notify the outcome of such exchanges to the Board.