14 Amendments of Richard CORBETT related to 2014/0285(COD)
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) It is appropriate to establish a multi- species fisheries plan taking into account the dynamics between the stocks of cod, herring and sprat, and also considering the by- catch species of the fisheries for these stocks, namely the Baltic stocks of plaice, brill, flounder and turbot, and incidental catches of seabirds and marine mammals. The objective of this plan should be to aim at achievinge and maintaining maximum sustainable yields for the stocks concerned.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) It is appropriateThe ultimate goal is to establish a multi- species fisheries plan taking into account the dynamics between the stocks of cod, herring and sprat, and also considering the by-catch species of the fisheries for these stocks, namely the Baltic stocks of plaice, brill, flounder and turbot. The objective of this plan should be to aim at achievinge and maintaining maximum sustainable yields for the stocks concerned, as well as to minimise the impact of the fisheries on the wider marine environment.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) It is appropriate to establish a multi- species fisheries plan taking into account the dynamics between the stocks of cod, herring and sprat, and also considering the by-catch species of the fisheries for these stocks, namely the Baltic stocks of plaice, brill, flounder and turbot. The objective of this plan should be to aim at achieving and maintainingrestore and maintain populations of harvested species above levels which can produce the maximum sustainable yields for the stocks concerned.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) These targets should therefore be established and expressed in terms of fishing mortality rates, based on scientific advice19 that restores and maintains populations of harvested species above levels which can produce the maximum sustainable yield. The maximum sustainable yield exploitation rate should be the upper limit for exploitation. __________________ 19 ICES technical services, September 2014 http://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication% 20Reports/Advice/2014/Special%20Reque sts/EU_Fmsy_range_for_Baltic_cod_and_ pelagic_stocks.pdf
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
Recital 25
(25) As regards the time-frame, it is expected that for the stocks concerned maximum sustainable yield should be reachedthe stocks concerned should achieve the target by 2015 where possible and, on a progressive, incremental basis at the latest by 201520. It should be maintained from therese dates on.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. The plan shall also apply to plaice, flounder, turbot and brill in ICES Subdivisions 22-32 as well as to seabirds and marine mammals caught when fishing for the stocks concerned.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The plan shall aim at contributing toplement the objectives of the common fisheries policy listed in Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 and in particular:
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) achieving and maintainensuring that exploitation restores and maintains populations of the stocks concerned above biomass levels capable of producing maximum sustainable yield for the stocks concerned, and
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. The plan shall aim at contributinge to the implementation of the landing obligation established in Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 for the stocks concerned and for plaice.
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 a (new)
Article 3 a (new)
Article 3a The plan shall contribute to the achievement of good environmental status pursuant to Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 20081a __________________ 1aDirective 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive) (OJ L 164, 25.6.2008, p.19)
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. When the spawning biomass of any of the stocks concerned for a certain year is below the minimum spawning biomass levels set out in paragraph 1, appropriate remedial measures shall be adopted to ensure rapid return ofthat the stocks concerned return to precautionary levels as soon as possible. In particular, by way of derogation from Article 4(2) of this Regulation and in accordance with Article 16(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 fishing opportunities shall be set at levels lower than those resulting in target fishing mortality ranges laid down in Article 4(1). These remedial measures may also include, as appropriate, the submission of legislative proposals by the Commission and emergency measures adopted by the Commission under Article 12 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013.
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The measures referred to in paragraph 1 shall aim at achieving the objectives set out in Article 3 and in particular the protection of juveniles or spawning fish, and the mitigation of incidental catches of seabirds and marine mammals.
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. By way of derogation from Article 17(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009, the prior notification obligation laid down in that Article shall apply to masters of Union fishing vessels of eight metres overall length or more retaining on board at least 300 kg of cod or two tons of pelagic stocks. The competent authorities of the coastal Member States may give permission to an earlier entry at port.
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – title
Article 14 – title
Evaluation and review of the plan