BETA

15 Amendments of Richard CORBETT related to 2015/0133(COD)

Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) The definition of "recreational fisheries" should include all non- commercial fisheries, irrespective of their specific purpose, in order to cover all forms of fisheries that may affect fish stocks and ecosystems, to ensure the impact and socio-economic value of such fishing is fully taken into consideration when managing fisheries.
2016/01/26
Committee: PECH
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) The definition of "end-users" should be aligned with the definition of "end-users of scientific data" appearing in Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 and cover also scientific bodies and not-for-profit organisations with an interest in the environmental aspects of fisheries management.
2016/01/26
Committee: PECH
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21 a (new)
(21a) Fish stock assessments that are fundamental for scientific advice on sustainable catch levels depend on quality data. However, data are often the product of incomplete and inaccurate reporting, due inter alia to IUU fishing and some catches from recreational fisheries not being included in the assessments.
2016/01/26
Committee: PECH
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21 b (new)
(21b) there is a need for data collection on by-catch of protected species, including sea birds, marine mammals and turtles, and on the impact of fisheries on habitats, vulnerable marine areas and the ecosystem in order to ensure the proper implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive.
2016/01/26
Committee: PECH
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) Member States should determine the way they collect data, but in order to be able to combine data on a regional level in a meaningful way, minimum requirements for data quality, coverage and compatibility should be agreed by Member States at regUnional level. When there is general agreement on the methods at regUnional level, Regional Co- ordination Groups should submit a regional work plan on the basis of that agreement for adoption by Commission.
2016/01/26
Committee: PECH
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) Union legislation should no longer determine the precise details of methodologies to be applied in collecting data. Provisions on particular methods of data collection should therefore be replaced by the description of the process by which they will be determined. That process should be in accordance to Union minimum requirements for data quality, coverage and compatibility and essentially include cooperation between Member States and data users in regional co- ordination groups, and validation by the Commission through work plans submitted by Member States.
2016/01/26
Committee: PECH
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) The data referred to in this Regulation should be put into publicly available national computerised databases so that they are accessible to the Commission and can be made available to data users. It is in the interest of all data user that data which does not allow for personal identification should be available without restrictions to any party who has an interest in its analysis.
2016/01/26
Committee: PECH
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) the information needs for the management and implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy, the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, the Integrated Maritime Policy and the Birds and Habitats Directives;
2016/01/26
Committee: PECH
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point a a (new)
(aa) the information needs on the impact of decisions on recreational fisheries;
2016/01/26
Committee: PECH
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) the need and relevance of data for decisions on fisheries management and protection of the ecosystem including vulnerable species, birds and habitats,
2016/01/26
Committee: PECH
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
(da) including socio-economic data on recreational fisheries to enable the socio- economic performance of the Union recreational fisheries sector to be assessed;
2016/01/26
Committee: PECH
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission shall approve the work plans and the amendments thereto made in accordance with Article 8(2) on the basis of the evaluation by the STECF, not later than three months after receiving the work plans.
2016/01/26
Committee: PECH
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall set up adequate processes and publicly accessible electronic technologies to ensure an effective application of Article 25 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, and shall refrain from any unnecessary restrictions to the widest possible dissemination of detailed and aggregated data.
2016/01/26
Committee: PECH
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall set up adequate processes and electronic technologies to ensure an effective application of Article 25 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, and shall refrain from anyimposing unnecessary restrictions to public availability to ensure the widest possible dissemination of detailed and aggregated data.
2016/01/26
Committee: PECH
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure that relevant detailed and aggregated data are updated and made available to end-users within one month from the receipt of a request for those data. In case of requests made by other interested parties, Member States shall ensure that the data are updated and made availableand other interested parties within twoone months from the receipt of a request for those data.
2016/01/26
Committee: PECH