BETA

10 Amendments of Rainer WIELAND related to 2013/2119(INI)

Amendment 3 #
1a. Points out that petitions submitted by European Union citizens refer to violations of EU law, particularly in the fields of fundamental rights, environment, internal market and property rights; considers that petitions give evidence that there are still frequent and widespread instances of incomplete transposition or of misapplication of EU law;
2013/10/31
Committee: PETI
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Points out that, by discussing petitions, the Committee on Petitions helps to draw attention to the misapplication of EU law; proposes that Member State representatives might be present during these discussions in the committee;
2013/10/31
Committee: PETI
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Highlights the significant number of petitions received on issues related to the economic and social crises and the austerity measures, which risk to undermine the citizens’ social rights and remembers that Europe needs to put the citizens first and work for their well- being;deleted
2013/10/31
Committee: PETI
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Underlines that due to the poor management of a public sector, the burden on the citizens is constantly rising; therefore urges the Commission and Member States to put more efforts in this sphere in order to improve the management of this sector and reduce costs;deleted
2013/10/31
Committee: PETI
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that citizens, businesses and other stakeholders expect a simple and, predictable and reliable regulatory framework; indicates that excessive as well as too few regulation disrupts competitiveness and retards the growth of economy; points, therefore, to the need of a reduction in bureaucracy and administrative burdens and calls on the Commission to identify the pieces of legislation where regulatory costs can be reduced;
2013/10/31
Committee: PETI
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Urges Member States to avoid unnecessary administrative requirements and burdens for enterprises; Member States therefore should clearly identify mandatory provisions of EU law and measures for their implementation proposed by parliaments on the national level, together with clarifications regarding the establishment of additional (not that indicated in the EU law) provisions;deleted
2013/10/31
Committee: PETI
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Welcomes the case law of the European Court of Justice on the interpretation of Article 51 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which emphasises in respect of the Equal Rights Trust that the institutions of the Member States shall be bound by the overriding fundamental rights of the Union even if they wish to use national measures to restrict the fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU);
2013/10/31
Committee: PETI
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Welcomes the fact that all the Member States are taking part in EU Pilot; hopes that this will lead to a further reduction in infringement proceedings; calls for more to be done to inform citizens about EU Pilot;
2013/10/31
Committee: PETI
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls on the Commission to take stronger action against the late transposition of directives; encourages the Commission to make more use of penalty payments; stresses the importance of linking new legislation to correct implementation in the Member States, in view of the late transposition of EU law in some of the Member States;
2013/10/31
Committee: PETI
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 15
Calls on the Commission to provide public access to information on infringement cases through a user-friendly database, providing comprehensive information on the infringements related to specific EU legislative acts or to a Member State;deleted
2013/10/31
Committee: PETI