BETA

36 Amendments of Ian HUDGHTON related to 2011/0380(COD)

Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
(37) As a result of the establishment of systems of transferable fishing concessions envisaged in Article 27 of the [CFP Regulation] and in order to support Member States in the implementation of these new systems, the EMFF should grant support in terms of capacity building and exchange of best practices.deleted
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
(38) The introduction of the transferable fishing concessions systems should make the sector more competitive. Consequently, there may be a need for new professional opportunities outside the fishing activities. Therefore, the EMFF should support the diversification and job creation in fishing communities in particular by supporting business start- ups and the reassignment of vessels for maritime activities outside fishing activities of small scale coastal fishing vessels. This last operation seems to be appropriate as the small scale coastal fishing vessels are not covered by the transferable fishing concessions systems.deleted
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
(39) The objective of the Common Fisheries Policy is to ensure a sustainable exploitation of fish stocks. Overcapacity has been identified as a major driver for overfishing. It is therefore paramount to adapt the Union fishing fleet to the resources available. The removal of overcapacity through public aid such as temporary or permanent cessation and scrapping schemes has proven ineffective. The EMFF will therefore support the establishment and management of systems of transferable fishing concessions aiming at the reduction of overcapacity and increased economic performance and profitability of the operators concerned.deleted
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
(40) With overcapacity being one of the key drivers of overfishing, measures need to be taken to adapt the Union fishing fleet to the resources available; in this context, the EMFF should support the establishment, modification and management of the systems of transferable fishing concessions introduced by the CFP as management tools for reducing overcapacity.deleted
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 356 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 50
(50) Conscious of the need to identify the most suitable areas for developing aquaculture taking into account access to waters and space, the EMFF should support national authorities in making their strategic choices at national level within the constitutional order of each Member State.
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 546 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) promoting a balanced and inclusive territorial development of fisheries areas taking into account the regionalised approach necessary in fisheries management;
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 556 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) fostersupporting the implementation and decentralisation of the CFP.
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 586 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
(b) diversification of fisheries activities where necessary and appropriate into other sectors of maritime economy and growth of maritime economy, including mitigation of climate change.
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 611 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
(b) enhancement of the competitiveness and viability of fisheries, in particular of small scale coastal fleet, and improvement of safety or working conditions;
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 656 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a
(a) reduction of thany negative impacts of fisheries on the marine environment;
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 698 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point b a (new)
(ba) the support for the establishment of mechanisms necessary to properly decentralise the CFP within the terms of [the CFP regulation].
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 779 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) temporary cessation of fishing activities;deleted
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 799 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) transfer of ownership of a business except where this is the purchase of a business through diversification out of fishing or where professional fishermen purchase an existing processing business linked to article 40.;
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 875 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall draw up a single operational programme for its entire territory to implement the Union priorities to be co- financed by the EMFF or a set of regional operational programmes. Member States with regional operational programmes may also submit for approval a national framework containing common elements for these programmes without a separate budgetary allocation.
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 877 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Where the constitutional arrangements of a Member State are such that responsibilities for fisheries management within different parts of that Member State's territory lies with different legislative institutions, regional operational programmes to be co- financed by the EMFF shall be drawn up by each relevant legislative institution for the territory for which they are responsible.
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1203 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – title
Support to systems of transferable fishing concessions ofmethods for the allocation of fishing opportunities within the CFP
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1216 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. In order to establish or modify systems of transferable fishing concessions under Article 27facilitate the development, adaptation or modification of each Member State's chosen method for the allocation of fishing opportunities within the terms of [the [RCFP regulation on the CFP], the EMFF may support:
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1217 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the design and development of technical and administrative means necessary for the creation or functioning of a transferable fishing concessions systemdevelopment, adaptation, modification or functioning of the allocation method;
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1224 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) stakeholder participation in designing and developing transferable fishing concessions systemsor modifying the allocation method;
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1229 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the monitoring and evaluation of transferable fishing concessions systemshe allocation method;
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1234 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the management of transferable concessions systemshe allocation method.
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1321 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 4
4. Fishing vessels involved in projects financed under this Article shall not exceed 5% of the vessels of the national fleet or 5% of the national fleet tonnage in gross tonnage, calculated at the time of submission of the application.deleted
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1422 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. In order to also support the onshore processing of unwanted catches, as well as on board processing, support is available towards the purchase of existing processing facilities to process fishermen's own catches. This can include support towards joint venture companies with existing processors.
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1468 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 4
4. Support shall not cover the construction of new ports, new landing sites or new auction halls.deleted
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1917 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 70
1.The EMFF may support compensation to recognised producer organisations and associations of producers organisations which store fishery products listed in Annex II of Regulation No. [on the common organisation of the market in fishery and aquaculture products], provided that the products are stored in conformity with Articles 35 and 36 of Regulation No …[on the common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products]: (a) the amount of the storage aid shall not exceed the amount of the technical and financial costs of the actions required for the stabilisation and storage of the products in question; (b) the quantities eligible for storage aid shall not exceed 15 % of the annual quantities of the products concerned put up for sale by the producer organisation; (c) the financial assistance per year shall not exceed the following percentages of the average annual value of the marketed production at first sale of the members of producer organisation in the period 2009- 2011. In the case that members of producer organisation did not have any marketed production in 2009-2011, the average annual value of marketed production in the first three years of production of such member shall be taken into account: - 1 % in 2014 - 0,8 % in 2015 - 0,6 % in 2016 - 0,4 % in 2017 - 0,2 % in 2018 2. By 2019 support referred to in paragraph 1 shall be phased out. 3. The support shall only be granted once the products are released for human consumption. 4. Member States shall fix the amount of the technical and financial costs applicable in their territories as follows: (a) technical costs shall be calculated each year on the basis of direct costs relating to the actions required for stabilisation and storage; (b) financial costs shall be calculated each year using the interest rate set annually in each Member State; (c) technical and financial costs shall be made publicly available. 5. Member States shall carry out controls to ensure that the products benefiting from storage aid fulfil the conditions laid down in this Article. For the purposes of these inspection arrangements, beneficiaries of storage aid shall keep stock records for each category of products entered into storage and later reintroduced onto the market for human consumption.Article 70 deleted Storage aid
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2148 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 81 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii
(ii) maritime spatial planning and integrated coastal zone management;deleted
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2292 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that a management and control system has been set up for the operational programme ensuring a clear allocation and separation of functions between the managing authority, the paying agency and the certification body. Member States shall be responsible for ensuring that the system functions effectively throughout the progIn accordance with the principle of shared management, Member States and the Commission shall be responsible for the management and control of programmes in accordance with their respective responsibilities laid down in this Regulation. Given the single operational programme approach within this regulation, the management and control shall take into account the national circumstances including the appropriate level for delivery and body responsible for delivery. To this end Member States may designate partner managing authorities who have the legal responsibility for delivery at a sub national level and who will coordinate the alignment of the EMFF with other European funds as identified within the Common Strategic Framme periodwork.
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2293 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 107 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the managing authority, which may be either a public or private law body acting at national or regional level, or the Member State itself when it carries out that task, to be in charge of the manag and partner managing authority with responsibility for delivery of the programme, or elements of theat programme concerned;
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2304 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 107 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall clearly define the tasks of the managing authority, the paying agency and, under sustainable local development, the local action groups referred to in Article 62 with regard to the application of eligibility and selection criteria and the project sele and where appropriate, the partner managing authority, the accredited paying agency or the paying agency, and the local action pgrocedureups.
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2305 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 108 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The managing authority, and where appropriate the partner managing authority, shall be responsible for managing and implementing the programme in an efficient, effective and correct way, and in particular for:
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2318 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 108 – paragraph 2
2. The Member State or themanaging authority or the partner managing authority may designate one or more intermediate bodies including regional or local authorities, or non- governmental organisations, to carry out the management or implementation of operations under the operational programme.
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2319 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 108 – paragraph 3
3. When a part of its tasks is delegated to another body, the managing authority or partner managing authority shall retain full responsibility for the efficiency and correctness of management and implementation of those tasks. The managing authority shall ensure that appropriate provisions are in place to allow the other body to obtain all necessary data and information for execution of those tasks.
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2324 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 109 – paragraph 1
1. The paying agency shall be a dedicated department or body of the Member States responsible for the management and control of expenditure. With the exception of payment, the execution of those tasks may be delegated.
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2325 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 109 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall accredit as paying agencies departments or bodies which fulfil the accreditation criteria to be laid down by the Commission pursuant to Article 111(2). However, for those operational programmes where the total amount of support from the EMFF does not exceed EUR 250,000,000, the paying agency will not require to be accredited.
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2329 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 111 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) minimum conditions for the accreditation of paying agencies or paying agency with regard to the internal environment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring, as well as rules on the procedure for issuing and withdrawing accreditation;
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2336 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 112 – paragraph 1
1. The certification body shall be a public or private audit body designated by the Member State which shall provide an opinion on the management declaration of assurance covering the completeness, accuracy and veracity of the annual accounts of the paying agency, the proper functioning of its internal control system, the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions, as well as the respect of the principle of sound financial management. It shall be operationally independent from the paying agency concerned, the managing authority and the authority which has accredited that paying agency. However, for those operational programmes where the total amount of support from the Funds does not exceed EUR 250,000 000, the audit authority may be part of the same public authority or body as the managing authority unless expressly accepted by the Commission at the time of the adoption of the programme.
2013/01/17
Committee: PECH