BETA

22 Amendments of András GYÜRK related to 2011/0438(COD)

Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) Being addressed to Member States, this directive does not apply to procurement carried out by international organisations on their own behalf and for their own account. There is, however, a need to clarify to what extent this directive should be applied to procurement governed by specific international rulesAlthough the EU has a largely open public procurement market, several third countries are reluctant to open their procurement markets to international competition. In order to apply the reciprocity principle and improve the access of EU economic operators to third country public procurement markets protected by restrictive procurement measures, special rules shall be introduced pursuant to COM(2012)124 / 2012/0060(COD).
2012/06/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 37
(37) Contracts should be awarded on the basis of objective criteria that ensure compliance with the principles of transparency, non-discrimination and equal treatment. These criteria should guarantee that tenders are assessed in conditions of effective competition, also where contracting authorities require high-quality works, supplies and services that are optimally suited to their needs, for instance where the chosen award criteria include factors linked to the production process. As a result, contracting authorities should be allowed to adopt as award criteria either ‘the most economically advantageous tender’ or ‘the lowest cost’, taking into account that in the latter case they are free to set adequate quality standards by using technical specifications or contract performance conditions for highly standardised products.
2012/06/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 39
(39) It is of utmost importance to fully exploit the potential of public procurement to achieve the objectives of the Europe 2020 Strategy for sustainable growth. In particular public procurement is key to driving innovation, which is of great importance for future growth in Europe. In view of the important differences between individual sectors and markets, it would however not be appropriate to set general mandatory requirements for environmental, social and innovation procurement. The Union legislature has already set mandatory procurement requirements for obtaining specific goals in the sectors of road transport vehicles (Directive 2009/33/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of clean and energy-efficient road transport vehicles) and office equipment (Regulation (EC) No 106/2008 of the European Parliament and the Council of 15 January 2008 on a Community energy-efficiency labelling programme for office equipment). In addition, the definition of common methodologies for life cycle costing has significantly advanced. It therefore appears appropriate to continue on that path, leaving it to sector-specific legislation to set mandatory objectives and targets in function of the particular policies and conditions prevailing in the relevant sector and to promote the development and use of European approaches to life-cycle costing as a further underpinning for the use of public procurement in support of sustainable growth.
2012/06/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Member States mayshall provide that contracting authorities may apply innovation partnerships as regulated in this Directive.
2012/06/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 29 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Contracting authorities should not foreclose the market by pre-determining the innovative solution they are seeking, but rather they should be open to a range of different solutions to a given problem in order to incentivise the most innovative ideas.
2012/06/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 29 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
Only those economic operators invited by the contracting authority following its assessment of the requested information may submit research and innovation projects aimed at meeting the needs identified by the contracting authority that cannot be met by existing solutions. The contract shall be awarded on the sole basis of the award criterion of the most economically advantageous tender in accordance with Article 66(1)(a).
2012/06/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 66 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Costs may be assessed, on the choice of the contracting authority, on the basis of the price only in case of highly standardised products or using a cost-effectiveness approach, such as a life-cycle costing approach, under the conditions set out in Article 67.
2012/06/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 66 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) quality, including technical merit, aesthetic and functional characteristics, accessibility, design for all users, environmental characteristics and innovative character including inter alia additional innovative solutions that are in addition to minimum requirements laid down in the contract notice, the descriptive document or the invitation to confirm interest;
2012/06/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) There is a widespread need for additional flexibility and in particular for wider access to a procurement procedure providing for negotiations, as is explicitly foreseen in the Agreement, where negotiation is allowed in all procedures. Contracting authorities should, unless otherwise provided in the legislation of the Member State concerned, be able to use a competitive procedure with negotiation as provided for in this Directive, in various situations where open or restricted procedures without negotiations are not likely to lead to satisfactory procurement outcomes. This procedure should be accompanied by adequate safeguards ensuring observance of the principles of equal treatment and transparency. This will give greater leeway to contracting authorities to buy works, supplies and services perfectly adapted to their specific needs. At the same time, it should also increase cross-border trade, as the evaluation has shown that contracts awarded by negotiated procedure with prior publication have a particularly high success rate of cross-border tenders.
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 416 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 a (new)
Article 8a Specific exclusions in the field of postal services This Directive shall not apply to public contracts for the principal purpose of permitting the contracting authorities to provide postal services and other services than postal services. For the purposes of this Article: "postal services": means services consisting of the clearance, sorting, routing and delivery of postal items. This shall include both services falling within as well as services falling outside the scope of the universal service set up in conformity with Directive 97/67/EC; "other services than postal services": means services provided in the following areas: (i) mail service management services (services both preceding and subsequent to despatch, including "mailroom management services"); (ii) added-value services linked to and provided entirely by electronic means (including the secure transmission of coded documents by electronic means, address management services and transmission of registered electronic mail); (iii) services concerning postal items not included in point (a), such as direct mail bearing no address; (iv) financial services, as defined in the CPV under the reference numbers from 66100000-1 to 66720000-3 and in Article 19(c) and including in particular postal money orders and postal giro transfers; (v) philatelic services; (vi) logistics services (services combining physical delivery and/or warehousing with other non-postal functions).
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 676 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 5
Member States may decide not to transpose into their national law the competitive procedure with negotiation, the competitive dialogue and the innovation partnership procedures.deleted
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1087 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 56 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
The minimum yearly turnover shall not exceed three times the estimated contract value, except in duly justified circumstances relating to the special risks attached to the nature of the works, services or supplies. The contracting authority shall indicate such exceptional circumstances in the procurement documents.
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1466 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 84 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. Member States shall appoint a single independent body responsible forensure the oversight and coordination of implementation activities (hereinafter 'the oversight body'). Member States shall inform the Commission of their designation.
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1474 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 84 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
3. The oversight bodycompetent authorities shall be responsible for the following tasks:
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1488 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 84 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
Member States shall empower the oversight body to seize theThe competent authorities may seek from the court which has jurisdiction competent according to national law for thea review of contracting authorities' decisions where ithey hasve detected a violation in the course of itstheir monitoring and legal advising activity.
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1490 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 84 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
4. Without prejudice to the general procedures and working methods established by the Commission for its communications and contacts with Member States, the oversight bodycompetent authorities shall act as a specific contact point for the Commission when it monitors the application of Union law and the implementation of the budget from the Union on the basis of Article 17 of the Treaty on the European Union and Article 317 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. It shall report to the Commission any violation of this Directive in procurement procedures for the award of contracts directly or indirectly funded by the Union.
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1491 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 84 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
The Commission may in particular refer to the oversight body the treatment of individual cases where a contract is not yet concluded or a review procedure can still be carried out. It may also entrust the oversight body with the monitoring activities necessary to ensure the implementation of the measures to which Member States are committed in order to remedy a violation of Union public procurement rules and principles identified by the Commission.deleted
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1492 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 84 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3
The Commission may require the oversight body to analyse alleged breaches to Union public procurement rules affecting projects co-financed by the budget of the Union. The Commission may entrust the oversight body to follow- up certain cases and to ensure that the appropriate consequences of breaches to Union public procurement rules affecting projects co-financed are taken by the competent national authorities which will be obliged to follow its instructions.deleted
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1493 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 84 – paragraph 5
5. The investigation and enforcement activities carried out by the oversight bodycompetent authorities to ensure that contracting authorities’ decisions comply with this Directive and the principles of the Treaty shall not replace or prejudge the institutional role of the Commission as guardian of the Treaty. When the Commission decides to refer the treatment of an individual case pursuant to paragraph 4, it shall also retain the right to intervene in accordance with the powers conferred to it by the Treaty.
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1495 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 84 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
6. Contracting authorities shall transmit to the national oversight bodycompetent authorities the full text of all concluded contracts with a a value equal to or greater than
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1502 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 84 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1
7. Without prejudice to the national law concerning access to information, and in accordance with national and EU legislation on data protection, the oversight bodycompetent authorities shall, upon written request, give unrestricted and full direct access, free of charge, to the concluded contracts referred to in paragraph 6. Access to certain parts of the contracts may be refused where their disclosure would impede law enforcement or otherwise be contrary to the public interest, would harm the legitimate commercial interests of economic operators, public or private, or might prejudice fair competition between them.
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1504 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 84 – paragraph 8
8. A summary of all the activities carried out by the oversight bodycompetent authorities in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 7 shall be included in the annual report referred to in paragraph 2.
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO