3 Amendments of József SZÁJER related to 2014/2228(INI)
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point e
Paragraph 1 – point e
e. Calls on the Commission to ensure that investors from the EU are not disadvantaged in the USA, including in relation to investors from other third States (such as Canada, Mexico, China, India and TPP States), which already now, or in future on the basis of negotiations currently under way, enjoy investor protection and have access to mechanisms for the settlement of disputes between States and investors; therefore to prepare a report of concrete problems experienced by European investors in the US where the lack of transatlantic investor-state dispute settlement possibilities prevented an effective solution or resulted in a less favourable situation of European investors vis-à-vis investors of third countries having such an instrument at their disposal; to keep TTIP negotiations on investor-state dispute settlement suspended until specific proposals that duly reflect the results of the public consultation conducted on this subject are developed; and to develop these specific proposals in close consultation with the European Parliament;
Amendment 102 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Calls on the Commission to preserve the protection of certain products of which the origin is of high importance. Therefore, the adequate assurance of the application of the geographical indicators is essential in order to be able to enforce those rules;
Amendment 748 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point xiii a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point d – point xiii a (new)
(xiiia) to keep TTIP negotiations on investor-state dispute settlement suspended, until developing specific proposals, in close consultation with the European Parliament, that duly reflect the results of the public consultation conducted on this subject; to prepare a report for the consultations with the European Parliament on concrete problems experienced by European investors in the US, where the lack of transatlantic investor-state dispute settlement possibilities prevented an effective solution or resulted in a less favourable situation of European investors vis-à-vis investors of third countries having such an instrument at their disposal;