Activities of Emmanuel MAUREL related to 2020/2017(INI)
Shadow opinions (1)
OPINION on artificial intelligence in education, culture and the audiovisual sector
Amendments (10)
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines that artificial intelligence (AI) and related technologies arshould be a tool to serve the people and that algorithmic systems can enable access to information, including listings of different kinds of cultural objects; notes the risks of intellectual property rights (IPR) infringement when blending AI and different technologies with a multiplicity of sources (documents, photos, films);
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Points out that AI technologies pose a danger as regards the collection of the personal data of pupils and teachers in particular, which could constitute a violation of their fundamental rights; recommends, therefore, that audiovisual recording and monitoring devices not be used in schools to collect data for AI- related purposes;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Expresses serious concern that schools and other education providers are becoming increasingly dependent on educational technology services, including AI applications, provided by companies with a dominant market position most of which are based outside the EU;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Points out that data protection and privacy can be particularly seriously affected by AI; advocates compliance with the principles laid down in the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR);
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Calls on the Commission to take more effective steps to protect the personal data of pupils and teachers in the education sphere;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Emphasises that automated means of removing copyrighted works that are posted without authorisation on online platforms on which audiovisual content is shared should be standardised at EU level to ensure that they function properly for the benefit both of users and of copyright- holders;
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Notes that automation and the development of AI could pose a threat to employment, and emphasises once again that priority must be given to safeguarding jobs, in particular in the education, culture and creative sectors;
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Calls on the Commission to lay down rules designed to guarantee effective data interoperability, in order to make content purchased on a platform accessible on any digital tool irrespective of make;
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. The ban on imposing a locked proprietary ecosystem for the use of digital products. In order to make for genuine data interoperability, digital products must be in open formats so as to allow users to export to different digital environments.