BETA

Activities of Emmanuel MAUREL related to 2021/0136(COD)

Shadow opinions (1)

OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 as regards establishing a framework for a European Digital Identity
2022/11/07
Committee: JURI
Dossiers: 2021/0136(COD)
Documents: PDF(285 KB) DOC(207 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Pascal ARIMONT', 'mepid': 24922}]

Amendments (47)

Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) It is necessary to set out the harmonised conditions for the establishment of a framework for European Digital Identity Wallets to be issued by Member States, which should empower all Union citizens and other residents as defined by national law to share securely data related to their identity in a user friendly and convenient way under the sole control of the user. Technologies used to achieve those objectives should be developed aiming towards the highest level of security, user convenience and wide usability. Member States should ensure equal access and voluntary use to digital identification to all their nationals and residents.
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) All European Digital Identity Wallets should allow users to electronically identify and authenticate online and offline across borders for accessing a wide range of public services, and private services, where verification of certain attributes is strictly mandated by law. Without prejudice to Member States’ prerogatives as regards the identification of their nationals and residents, Wallets can also serve the institutional needs of public administrations, international organisations and the Union’s institutions, bodies, offices and agencies. Offline use would be important in many sectors, including in the health sector where services are often provided through face-to-face interaction and ePrescriptions should be able to rely on QR-codes or similar technologies to verify authenticity. Relying on the level of assurance “high”, the European Digital Identity Wallets should benefit from the potential offered by tamper-proof solutions such as secure elements, to comply with the security requirements under this Regulation. The European Digital Identity Wallets should also allow users to create and use qualified electronic signatures and seals which are accepted across the EU. To achieve simplification and cost reduction benefits to persons and businesses across the EU, including by enabling powers of representation and e-mandates, Member States should issue European Digital Identity Wallets relying on common standards to ensure seamless interoperability and a high level of security. Only Member States’ competent authorities can provide a high degree of confidence in establishing the identity of a person and therefore provide assurance that the person claiming or asserting a particular identity is in fact the person he or she claims to be. It is therefore necessary that the European Digital Identity Wallets rely on the legal identity of citizens, other residents or legal entities. Trust in the European Digital Identity Wallets would be enhanced by the fact that issuing parties are required to implement appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure a level of security commensurate to the risks raised for the rights and freedoms of the natural persons, in line with Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) In order to achieve a high level of security and trustworthiness, this Regulation establishes the requirements for European Digital Identity Wallets. The conformity of European Digital Identity Wallets with those requirements should be certified by accredited public or private sector bodies designated by Member States. Relying on a certification scheme based on the availability of commonly agreed standards with Member States should ensure a high level of trust and interoperability. Certification should in particular rely on the relevant European cybersecurity certifications schemes established pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/88120 . Such certification should be without prejudice to certification as regards personal data processing pursuant to Regulation (EC) 2016/679 _________________ 20 Regulation (EU) 2019/881 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on ENISA (the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity) and on information and communications technology cybersecurity certification and repealing Regulation (EU) No 526/2013 (Cybersecurity Act), OJ L 151, 7.6.2019, p. 15
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) European Digital Identity Wallets should ensure the highest level of security for the personal data used for authentication irrespective of whether such data is stored locally or on cloud-based solutions, taking into account the different levels of risk. Using biometrics to authenticate is one of the identifications methods providing a high level of confidence, in particular when used in combination with other elements of authenticationshall not be a precondition for using European Digital Identity Wallets. Since biometrics represents a unique characteristic of a person, the use of biometrics requires organisational and security measures, commensurate to the risk that such processing may entail to the rights and freedoms of natural persons and in accordance with Regulation 2016/679.
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) To ensure that the European Digital Identity framework is open to innovation, technological development and future-proof, Member States should be encouraged to set-up jointly sandboxes to test innovative solutions in a controlled and secure environment in particular to improve the functionality, protection of personal data, security and interoperability of the solutions and to inform future updates of technical references and legal requirements. This environment should foster the inclusion of European Small and Medium Enterprises, start-ups and individual innovators and researchers.deleted
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) Service providers use the identity data provided by the set of person identification data available from electronic identification schemes pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 in order to match users from another Member State with the legal identity of that user. However, despite the use of the eIDAS data set, in many cases ensuring an accurate match requires additional information about the user and specific unique identification procedures at national level. To further support the usability of electronic identification means, this Regulation should require Member States to take specific measures to ensure a correct identity match in the process of electronic identification. For the same purpose, this Regulation should also extend the mandatory minimum data set and require the use of a unique and persistent electronic identifier in conformity with Union law in those cases where it is necessary to legally identify the user upon his/her request in a unique and persistent way.
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) Any entity that collects, creates and issues attested attributes such as diplomas, licences, certificates of birth should be able to become a provider of electronic attestation of attributes. Relying parties should use the electronic attestations of attributes as equivalent to attestations in paper format. Therefore, an electronic attestation of attributes should not be denied legal effect solely on the grounds that it is in an electronic form or that it does not meet the requirements of the qualified electronic attestation of attributes. To that effect, general requirements should be laid down to ensure that a qualified electronic attestation of attributes has the equivalent legal effect of lawfully issued attestations in paper form. Nevertheless, lawfully insured attestations in paper form shall be accepted by relying parties as an alternative to electronic attestation of attributes. However, those requirements should apply without prejudice to Union or national law defining additional sector specific requirements as regards form with underlying legal effects and, in particular, the cross-border recognition of qualified electronic attestation of attributes, where appropriate.
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) Wide availability and usability of the European Digital Identity Wallets require their acceptance byand trust by citizens' as an acceptable means to share their personal data with private service providers. Private relying parties providing services in the areas of transport, energy, banking and financial services, social security, health, drinking water, postal services, digital infrastructure, education or telecommunications should accept the use of European Digital Identity Wallets for the provision of services where strong user authentication for online identification is required by national or Union law or by contractual obligation. Where very large online platforms as defined in Article 25.1. of Regulation [reference DSA Regulation] require users to authenticate to access online services, those platforms should be mandated to accept the use of European Digital Identity Wallets upon voluntary request of the user. Users should be under no obligation to use the wallet to access private services, but if they wish to do so, large online platforms should accept the European Digital Identity Wallet for this purpose while respecting the principle of data minimisation. Given the importance of very large online platforms, due to their reach, in particular as expressed in number of recipients of the service and economic transactions this is necessary to increase the protection of users from fraud and secure a high level of data protec. Users should be under no obligation to use the wallet to access private services, but if they wish to do so, large online platforms should accept the European Digital Identity Wallet for this purpose while respecting the principle of data minimisation. Self- regulatory codes of conduct at Union level (‘codes of conduct’) should be developed in order to contribute to wide availability and usability of electronic identification means including European Digital Identity Wallets within the scope of this Regulation. The codes of conduct should facilitate wide acceptance of electronic identification means including European Digital Identity Wallets by those service providers which do not qualify as very large platforms and which rely on third party electronic identification services for user authentication. They should be developed within 12 months of the adoption of this Regulation. The Commission should assess the effectiveness of these provisions for the availability and usability for the user of the European Digital Identity Wallets after 18 months of their deployment and revise the provisions to ensure their acceptance by means of delegated acts in the light of this assessment.
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) Website authentication services provide users with assurance that there is a genuine and legitimate entity standing behind the website. Those services contribute to the building of trust and confidence in conducting business online, as users will have confidence in a website that has been authenticated. The use of website authentication services by websites is voluntary. However, in order for website authentication to become a means to increasing trust, providing a better experience for the user and furthering growth in the internal market, this Regulation lays down minimal security and liability obligations for the providers of website authentication services and their services. To that end, web-browsers should ensure support and interoperability with Qualified certificates for website authentication pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 910/2014. They should recognise and display Qualified certificates for website authentication to provide a high level of assurance, allowing website owners to assert their identity as owners of a website and users to identify the website owners with a high degree of certainty. To further promote their usage, public authorities in Member States should consider incorporating Qualified certificates for website authentication in their websites.deleted
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
(33) Many Member States have introduced national requirements for services providing secure and trustworthy digital archiving in order to allow for the long term preservation of electronic documents and associated trust services. To ensure legal certainty and trust, it is essential to provide a legal framework to facilitate the cross border recognition of qualified electronic archiving services. That framework could also open new market opportunities for Union trust service providers.deleted
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
(34) Qualified electronic ledgers record data in a manner that ensures the uniqueness, authenticity and correct sequencing of data entries in a tamper proof manner. An electronic ledger combines the effect of time stamping of data with certainty about the data originator similar to e-signing and has the additional benefit of enabling more decentralised governance models that are suitable for multi-party co-operations. For example, it creates a reliable audit trail for the provenance of commodities in cross-border trade, supports the protection of intellectual property rights, enables flexibility markets in electricity, provides the basis for advanced solutions for self- sovereign identity and supports more efficient and transformative public services. To prevent fragmentation of the internal market, it is important to define a pan-European legal framework that allows for the cross-border recognition of trust services for the recording of data in electronic ledgers.deleted
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
(35) The certification as qualified trust service providers should provide legal certainty for use cases that build on electronic ledgers. This trust service for electronic ledgers and qualified electronic ledgers and the certification as qualified trust service provider for electronic ledgers should be notwithstanding the need for use cases to comply with Union law or national law in compliance with Union law. Use cases that involve the processing of personal data must comply with Regulation (EU) 2016/679. Use cases that involve crypto assets should be compatible with all applicable financial rules for example with the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive23 , the Payment Services Directive24 and the future Markets in Crypto Assets Regulation25 . _________________ 23 Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU Text with EEA relevance, OJ L 173, 12.6.2014, p. 349– 496. 24 Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on payment services in the internal market, amending Directives 2002/65/EC, 2009/110/EC and 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, and repealing Directive 2007/64/EC, OJ L 337, 23.12.2015, p. 35– 127. 25 Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Markets in Crypto-assets, and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937, COM/2020/593 final.
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EU) No 910/2014
Article 1 – point c
(c) establishes a legal framework for electronic signatures, electronic seals, electronic time stamps, electronic documents, electronic registered delivery services, certificate services for website authentication, electronic archiving and electronic attestation of attributes, the management of remote electronic signature and seal creation devices, and electronic ledgers;
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c
Regulation (EU) No 910/2014
Article 3 – point 14
(14) ‘certificate for electronic signature’ means an electronic attestation or set of attestations which links electronic signature validation data to a natural person and confirms at least the name or the pseudonym of that person;;
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point g
Regulation (EU) No 910/2014
Article 3 – point 29
(29) ‘certificate for electronic seal’ means an electronic attestation or set of attestations that links electronic seal validation data to a legal person and confirms the name or pseudonym of that person;;
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point i
Regulation (EU) No 910/2014
Article 3 – point 53
(53) ‘electronic ledger’ means a tamper proof electronic record of data, providing authenticity and integrity of the data it contains, accuracy of their date and time, and of their chronological ordering;deleted
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point i
Regulation (EU) No 910/2014
Article 3 – point 55
(55) ‘unique identification’ means a process where person identification data or person identification means are matched with or linked to an existing account belonging to the same person.’;deleted
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EU) No 910/2014
Article 5
Without prejudice to the legal effect given to pseudonyms under national law, the use of pseudonyms in electronic transactions shall not be prohibited.; , and the use of pseudonyms shall always be an option under this Regulation.
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EU) No 910/2014
Article 5 a (new)
Article 5a Specific provisions to safeguard fundamental rights of natural persons' The use of the European Digital Identity Wallet shall not be mandatory for natural persons. Where essential services are provided and access to those requires the use of the European Digital Identity Wallet, easily accessible alternatives shall be offered by the service provider.
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EU) No 910/2014
Article 6a – paragraph 4 – point d
(d) provide a mechanism to ensure that the relying party is able to authenticate the user andor to receive electronic attestations of attributes; where attestations of attributes are adequate for the purposes of the relying party, no prior electronic authentication or identification shall take place;
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EU) No 910/2014
Article 6a – paragraph 4 – point e
(e) ensure that the person identification data referred to in Articles 12(4), point (d) uniquely and persistently represent the natural or legal person is associated with it.deleted
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Regulation (EU) No 910/2014
6. The European Digital Identity Wallets shall be issued under a notified electronic identification scheme of level of assurance ‘high’. The use of the European Digital Identity Wallets shall be free of charge to natural persons. Access to government or other essential services, the labour market and freedom obtain goods and services shall not be restricted or hindered for natural persons not using the European Digital Identity Wallet.
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EU) No 910/2014
Article 6b – paragraph 1
1. Where relying parties intend to rely upon European Digital Identity Wallets issued in accordance with this Regulation, they shall communicate it torequest approval from the Member State where the relying party is established to ensure compliance of their intended use and the information they intend to request with requirements set out in Union law or national law for the provision of specific services. When communicating their intention to rely on European Digital Identity wallets, they shall also inform about the intended use of the European Digital Identity Wallet.
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EU) No 910/2014
Article 6b – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall implement a common mechanism and unique identification for the authentication of relying parties. Member states may revoke the authorization of relying parties in case of illegal or fraudulent use of the European Digital Identity Wallet in their country.
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Regulation (EU) No 910/2014
Article 11a
(12) the following Article 11a is inserted: ‘Article 11a Unique Identification 1. When notified electronic identification means and the European Digital Identity Wallets are used for authentication, Member States shall ensure unique identification. 2. Member States shall, for the purposes of this Regulation, include in the minimum set of person identification data referred to in Article 12.4.(d), a unique and persistent identifier in conformity with Union law, to identify the user upon their request in those cases where identification of the user is required by law. 3. Within 6 months of the entering into force of this Regulation, the Commission shall further specify the measures referred to in paragraph 1 and 2 by means of an implementing act on the implementation of the European Digital Identity Wallets as referred to in Article 6a(10).’deleted
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 910/2014
Article 12 – paragraph 4 – point d
(d) a reference to a minimum set of person identification data necessary to uniquely and persistentuniquely representing a natural or legal person;, which is available from electronic identification schemes;
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 186 #
(a) the exchange of information, experience and good practice as regards electronic identification schemes and in particular technical requirements related to interoperability, unique identification and assurance levels;;
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16
Regulation (EU) No 910/2014
Article 12b – paragraph 2
2. Where private relying parties providing services are required by national or Union law, to use strong user authentication for online identification, or where strong user authentication is required by contractual obligation, including in the areas of transport, energy, banking and financial services, social security, health, drinking water, postal services, digital infrastructure, education or telecommunications, private relying partiesthey shall also accept the use of European Digital Identity Wallets issued in accordance with Article 6a.
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16
Regulation (EU) No 910/2014
Article 12b – paragraph 3
3. Where very large online platforms as defined in Regulation [reference DSA Regulation] Article 25.1. require users to authenticate to access online services, they shall also accept the use of European Digital Identity Wallets issued in accordance with Article 6a strictly upon voluntary request of the user and in respect of the minimum attributes necessary for the specific online service for which authentication is requested, such as proof of age. In this case, revocable pseudonyms can be generated and used in connection to an identifiable European Digital Identity Wallets.
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 – point a – point 1
(c) to inform the relevant national competent authorities of the Member States concerned, designated pursuant to Directive (EU) XXXX/XXXX [NIS2], of any significant breaches of security or loss of integrity they become aware of in the performance of their tasks. where the significant breach of security or loss of integrity concerns other Member States, the supervisory body shall inform the single point of contact of the Member State concerned designated pursuant to Directive (EU) XXXX/XXXX (NIS2);;
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 38
Regulation (UE) No 910/2014
Article 45
(38) Article 45 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 45 Requirements for qualified certificates for website authentication 1. Qualified certificates for website authentication shall meet the requirements laid down in Annex IV. Qualified certificates for website authentication shall be deemed compliant with the requirements laid down in Annex IV where they meet the standards referred to in paragraph 3. 2. Qualified certificates for website authentication referred to in paragraph 1 shall be recognised by web-browsers. For those purposes web-browsers shall ensure that the identity data provided using any of the methods is displayed in a user friendly manner. Web-browsers shall ensure support and interoperability with qualified certificates for website authentication referred to in paragraph 1, with the exception of enterprises, considered to be microenterprises and small enterprises in accordance with Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC in the first 5 years of operating as providers of web-browsing services. 3. Within 12 months of the entering into force of this Regulation, the Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, provide the specifications and reference numbers of standards for qualified certificates for website authentication referred to in paragraph 1. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).;’deleted
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 39
Regulation (UE) No 910/2014
Article 45a – paragraph 1
1. An electronic attestation of attributes shall not be denied legal effect and admissibility as evidence in legal proceedings solely on the grounds that it is in electronic form or that it does not meet the requirements for qualified electronic attestations of attributes.
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 39
Regulation (UE) No 910/2014
Article 45a – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Lawfully issued attestations in paper form shall be accepted by relying parties as an alternative to electronic attestation of attributes
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 39
Regulation (EU) No 910/2014
Section 11 – numebering of section
SECTION 11deleted
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 39
Regulation (EU) No 910/2014
Section 11 – title of section
ELECTRONIC LEDGERSdeleted
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 39
Regulation (EU) No 910/2014
Article 45h – numbering of the article
Article 45hdeleted
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 39
Regulation (UE) No 910/2014
Article 45h –title of article
Legal effects of electronic ledgersdeleted
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 39
Regulation (UE) No 910/2014
Article 45h – paragraph 1
1. An electronic ledger shall not be denied legal effect and admissibility as evidence in legal proceedings solely on the grounds that it is in an electronic form or that it does not meet the requirements for qualified electronic ledgers.deleted
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 39
Regulation (EU) No 910/2014
Article 45h – paragraph 2
2. A qualified electronic ledger shall enjoy the presumption of the uniqueness and authenticity of the data it contains, of the accuracy of their date and time, and of their sequential chronological ordering within the ledger.deleted
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 39
Regulation (EU) No 910/2014
Article 45i – numering of the article
Article 45ideleted
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 39
Regulation (EU) No 910/2014
Article 45i – title
Requirements for qualified electronic ledgersdeleted
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 39
Regulation (EU) No 910/2014
Article 45i – paragraph 1
1. Qualified electronic ledgers shall meet the following requirements: (a) they are created by one or more qualified trust service provider or providers; (b) they ensure the uniqueness, authenticity and correct sequencing of data entries recorded in the ledger; (c) they ensure the correct sequential chronological ordering of data in the ledger and the accuracy of the date and time of the data entry; (d) they record data in such a way that any subsequent change to the data is immediately detectable.deleted
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 39
Regulation (EU) No 910/2014
Article – paragraph 2
2. Compliance with the requirements laid down in paragraph 1 shall be presumed where an electronic ledger meets the standards referred to in paragraph 3.deleted
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 39
Regulation (UE) No 910/2014
Article 45i – paragraph 3
3. The Commission may, by means of implementing acts, establish reference numbers of standards for the processes of execution and registration of a set of data into, and the creation, of a qualified electronic ledger. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).;deleted
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 40
Regulation (EU) No 910/2014
Article 48a – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure the collection of statistics in relation to the functioning of the European Digital Identity Wallets and the qualified trust services including the number of rejected applications including their reasoning.
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 40
Regulation (EU) No 910/2014
Article 48a – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
2 a. (ca) the type and number of security incidents, suspected data breaches and affected users
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 40
Regulation (EU) No 910/2014
Article 48a – pragraph 2 – point c b (new)
2 b. (cb) the number of user complaints and suspected consumer protection or data protection incidents relating to relying parties
2022/06/21
Committee: JURI