Activities of Jana NAGYOVÁ
Plenary speeches (3)
The historic CJEU ruling on the Apple state aid case and its consequences (debate)
Topical debate (Rule 169) - Taxing the super-rich to end poverty and reduce inequalities: EU support to the G20 Presidency’s proposal (topical debate)
Need to strengthen rail travel and the railway sector in Europe (debate)
Institutional motions (3)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The case of José Daniel Ferrer García in Cuba
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The deteriorating situation of women in Afghanistan due to the recent adoption of the law on the “Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice”
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Venezuela
Written questions (2)
Preliminary findings against X on breaching the Digital Services Act and a secret deal with other platforms
Potential retroactive ban on diesel-powered passenger vehicles
Amendments (4)
Amendment 29 #
2024/2718(RSP)
Draft motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the purely ideological policies adopted by the EU in the context of the Green Deal are leading the EU to a worrying de-industrialization process and to the increasing of dependencies on third countries such as China;
Amendment 49 #
2024/2718(RSP)
Draft motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas in 2022 China was the largest emitter of GHG emissions, counting for the 30% of global GHG emissions, while the EU contributed to less than 7%;
Amendment 352 #
2024/2718(RSP)
Draft motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Takes note of the EU’s updated NDC; highlights that the EU’s current climate legislation willcould reduce the EU’s net GHG emissions by around 57 % compared to 1990, but it will trigger the de-industrialisation process of the EU and will increase the EU dependencies on third countries such as China;
Amendment 380 #
2024/2718(RSP)
Draft motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Reiterates the need to mairevise the EU Green Deal to enstuream that EU climate ambition into all EU policies and the measures transposing them, and underlines that Article 6(4) of the European Climate Law obliges the Commission to assess the consistency of any draft measure or legislative proposal, including budgetary proposals, with the EU’s climate targetsnd environmental policies are based on pragmatism, lead to enhanced competitiveness of European businesses and duly take into consideration the economic and social impact;