BETA

7 Amendments of Eszter LAKOS related to 2024/2109(INI)

Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights the importance of an agile FP; notes that the Heitor report outlines the importance of responding to the fast-changing field of science and innovation and recommends more self- governance in the FP through the establishment of councils as well as less prescriptive calls; recalls that the Draghi report notes that the current governance of the FP is slow and bureaucratic, that its organisation should be redesigned to be more outcome-based and evaluated by top experts and that the future FP should be governed by people from across all Member States with a proven track record at the frontier of research or innovation;
2024/12/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the fact that there has been an increase in the number of participants, from widening countries, in HEU; highlights the need of providing further support to all well performing widening measures at the country level.
2024/12/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Notes that no significant changes have taken place in the implementation of the missions since the publication of the communication; concludes, therefore, that further funding of missions under the 2025, 2026 and 2027 work programmes would not be an effective use of the limited resources available to HEU and should therefore be stopped; encourages the Commission to find funding for the continuation of missions in other parts of the EU budget and at national level;
2024/12/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 215 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls for FP10 to be a stand-alone EU programme dedicated to EU research excellence with collaborative projects at the heart of it, with a substantially higher budget that is sufficient for achieving the 3 % GDP spending target and for funding at least 75 % of the excellent proposals submitted; recommends that FP10 focus on three core objectives: (i) advancing the European Research Area (ERA) with specific measures that address regional disparities and support under-represented Member States in their innovation capacities, (ii) creating a European competition of ideas, and (iii) supporting strategic, large-scale collaborative research initiatives; recommends that FP10 be structured in three parts, each addressing one of the three core objectives;
2024/12/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 271 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 – point b
(b) setting up the four councils proposed by the Heitor expert group, composed of eminent experts from the field stemming from across Europe, to decide on the strategic direction of the different parts of FP10, and in particular a European technology and industrial competitiveness council and a European societal challenges council;
2024/12/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 290 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Reaffirms its support for the EIT's knowledge triangle approach as a driver of innovation and a tool to address gaps in the European innovation ecosystem; calls for enhanced alignment and synergies with the European Innovation Council (EIC) to maximize impact and coherence.
2024/12/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 301 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Believes that an expanded European Research Council (ERC) and European Innovation Council (EIC) should be at the heart of thcorner stone part of FP10 dealing with a European competition of ideas and that this part should receive half of the FP10 budgewith traditional collaborative projects at its' heart; recommends that these programmes be designed so that they create a European, bottom-up funnel for innovation to develop quickly from fundamental science to innovation scale- up; considers that the EIC can only succeed if it can both offer blended finance as a single project and act with the same speed and agility as private actors on the venture capitalist market through a tailor-made legal entity for implementation; underlines that the strengthened autonomy and self- governance of both the ERC and the EIC are crucial to achieving this;
2024/12/05
Committee: ITRE