Activities of Siegbert Frank DROESE
Plenary speeches (16)
Droughts and extreme weather events as a threat to local communities and EU agriculture in times of climate change (debate)
Possible extradition of Paul Watson: the danger of criminalisation of environmental defenders and whistle-blowers, and the need for their protection in the EU (debate)
The reintroduction of internal border controls in a number of Member States and its impact on the Schengen Area (debate)
The crisis facing the EU’s automotive industry, potential plant closures and the need to enhance competitiveness and maintain jobs in Europe (debate)
Presentation of the programme of activities of the Hungarian Presidency (debate)
Recent devastating floods in Bosnia and Herzegovina (debate)
The case of Bülent Mumay in Türkiye
Implementation of the Single European Sky (recast) (debate)
Establishing the Ukraine Loan Cooperation Mechanism and providing exceptional macro-financial assistance to Ukraine (debate)
Protecting our oceans: persistent threats to marine protected areas in the EU and benefits for coastal communities (debate)
EU-US relations in light of the outcome of the US presidential elections (debate)
Reinforcing EU’s unwavering support to Ukraine against Russia’s war of aggression and the increasing military cooperation between North Korea and Russia (debate)
Reinforcing EU’s unwavering support to Ukraine against Russia’s war of aggression and the increasing military cooperation between North Korea and Russia (debate)
Strengthening children’s rights in the EU - 35th anniversary of the adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (debate)
Strengthening children’s rights in the EU - 35th anniversary of the adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (debate)
Need to adopt an ambitious international legally binding agreement on plastic pollution, including in the marine environment
Written explanations (1)
Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States
Sofort Waffenstillstand, Diplomatie statt Waffen! Warum versucht man nicht, diplomatische Initiativen aus China, Brasilien oder der Türkei zu unterstützen? Warum wird der ungarische Ministerpräsident Orbán verurteilt, wenn er persönlich mit Präsident Putin spricht, und zuvor sogar mit Selenskyj? Und was ist mit dem korrupten Führer des Selenskyj-Regimes, mit selbigen Namen? Seine Amtszeit ist abgelaufen, er ist gar nicht mehr legitimiert, Entscheidungen zu treffen.Wo sind da die Prinzipienreiter der EU-Rechtsstaatlichkeit, die jeden Morgen nach Budapest schauen, um Präsident Orbán und das ungarische Volk zu beleidigen? Am Ende muss es einen Kompromiss geben für die vier annektierten Provinzen und die Krim, die schon vor 2014 zum großen Teil von russischsprachigen Bürgern bewohnt wurden.Ich als Mitglied dieses „Parlamentes“ und auch meine Partei, die AfD, unterstützen alle diplomatischen Bemühungen.Entscheidend ist die Souveränität der Völker und Nationen. Diesen Krieg müssen daher auch die Ukraine und Russland untereinander lösen. Dieser Krieg hat davon abgesehen auch eine lange Vorgeschichte. Ein baldiger Frieden wäre auch im großem Interesse Europas. Je länger der Krieg dauert, umso stärker ist die europäische, besonders die deutsche Wirtschaft, bedroht. Einzig die USA und China werden davon profitieren.Deshalb: Waffenstillstand jetzt und Friedensverhandlungen jetzt! Die Entschließung lehne ich daher ab.
Written questions (3)
Attack on Nord Stream 1 and 2
Housing crisis in the EU – urgent need to repeal Directive 2024/1275 on the energy performance of buildings
Opening of a NATO headquarters in Rostock
Individual motions (2)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on enabling Member States to opt-out of EU migration policy
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the victory of president-elect Donald Trump
Amendments (11)
Amendment 3 #
2024/0176(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls the economic, social and environmental relevance of fisheries, aquaculture and maritime affairs; stresses the vital role of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) not only in ensuring food security and resilience of marine ecosystems and food systems but also in boosting the development of a sustainable blue economy and upholding the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquaculture sectors;
Amendment 6 #
2024/0176(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 9 #
2024/0176(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 19 #
2024/0176(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Insists that special attention must be devoted to the fishing fleets in order to improve safety, on-board living conditions, energy efficiency and environmentalconomic sustainability, including renewal of the fleet, with special attention to the small scale fishing fleet; reiterates that this can contribute to making the fishery sector more attractive for the younger generations and must not be confused with fleet expansion or increased fishing capacity or ability to catch fish;
Amendment 32 #
2024/0176(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Urges the Commission to propose actions to increase the global share of sustainable EU aquaculture production, which contributes to the supply of aquatic protein of high quality and with a low carbon footprint; calls on the Member States and the Commission to make full use of the financial resources available for the EMFAF in order to sustainably boost the growth of this sector’s share of global aquaculture production above its current 2 % by means of specific, acceptable and shared targets for 2030;
Amendment 34 #
2024/0176(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Recalls that, as a result of Brexit, the EU fishing sector is still experiencing considerable economic disruptions especially with regard to the unilateral institution of fishing restricted areas in UK waters; calls on the Commission, therefore, as a matter of priority, to secure commensurate compensation to offset the damage suffered by the sector and fishing communitiesrespond appropiately to the unilateral action of the UK;
Amendment 52 #
2024/0176(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Pledges its support to the combat against illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing; calls therefore for adequate and increased funding for EU policies combating IUU fishing worldwide, including by strengthening EU border controls and checks on goods at EU borders, targeted development aid and by fostering cooperation with national navies;
Amendment 53 #
2024/0176(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
Amendment 62 #
2024/0176(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Underlines the role of the European Fisheries Control Agency (EFCA) in ensuring a level playing field for the EU fleet, and especially in discouraging and curbing IUU fishing in European waters and also at a global leveland adjacent waters; considers that the adoption of the new Control Regulation (EU 2023/2842) implies an important increase in EFCA’s tasks and responsibilities; recognises that the progressive implementation of the new control measures will need some activities in the form of pilot projects; calls on the Commission to provide adequate funds to EFCA to tackle the new tasks and activities, including participation to the tripartite working arrangement between the EFCA, the European Maritime Security Agency (EMSA) and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) considering EFCA’s contribution to the new EU Maritime Security Strategy (EUMSS);
Amendment 63 #
2024/0176(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
Amendment 73 #
2024/0176(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Reiterates the need to provide substantialappropriate support for disadvantaged coastal areas and European outermost regions. Calls for the European Commission to allow financial support for fleet renewal in the European outermost regions by ending the ban on State aid for vessel replacements. Recalls that, contrary to the provisions of the EMFAF, this objective has not received any European funding in any region.