43 Amendments of Oihane AGIRREGOITIA MARTÍNEZ
Amendment 50 #
2024/2109(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Highlights the importance of having a Framework Programme based on excellence in order to ensure participation of the best researchers in Europe through the whole programme.
Amendment 65 #
2024/2109(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Is deeply convinced that EU spending on science, research and innovation is the best investment in our common European future and for increasing competitiveness; agrees with Mr Draghi that all public R&D spending in the EU should be better coordinated at EU level and that a reformed and strengthened FP is crucial in achieving this;, meaning properly aligning investments with the EU strategic priorities, focusing on funding initiatives that achieve relevant impact and create added value; and that a reformed and strengthened FP is crucial in achieving this; at EU level and that a reformed and strengthened FP is crucial in achieving this; Recognizes that investments in research, development, and innovation in Europe are lagging behind China and the US, and that technology transfer is essential to address current EU innovations gaps.
Amendment 82 #
2024/2109(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that administrative simplification stagnated under HEU and might even have reversed, given that transaction costs rose signif; insists on further administrative simplification, streamlining of the relevant procedures, cutting costs and focusing on applicantly;s.
Amendment 91 #
2024/2109(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that a lthere arge number of beneficiaries do not consider the introductionvarious opinions and experiences among different beneficiaries regarding the functionality of lump- sum funding to be a simplification;s.
Amendment 107 #
2024/2109(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 4 a (new)
Subheading 4 a (new)
Recognises the importance of Pillar 1 in promoting scientific excellence and attracting highly-skilled research, through European Research Council (ERC), and programs such as the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) and the Future and Emerging Technologies (FET).
Amendment 122 #
2024/2109(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Concludes that Pillar 2 remains tooRecognizes the importance of Pillar 2 in fostering collaboration in multi-stakeholder settings. Acknowledges the complexity; believes that the implementation of this pillar should be improved, simplified and streamlined; notes that the number of instruments involved, the unsuccessful implementation of missions, and the many budgetary shifts have resulted in unnecessary complexity which discourages applicants, and especially newcomers, from participating;
Amendment 135 #
2024/2109(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 6 a (new)
Subheading 6 a (new)
Agrees that streamlining and boosting the European Innovation Council (EIC), attracting private investments, and supporting the commercialization of research should be the center of the Pillar 3, as confirmed by the Heitor Report. Recognizes EIC should have the flexibility to strategically maximise its potential to support breakthrough technology.
Amendment 161 #
2024/2109(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Recommends to expand and strengthen the public-private partnerships and co-funding mechanisms within FP10 to leverage resources, share risks, and accelerate technological developments. Further emphasizes that PPP governance structures should be streamlined and simplified to avoid unnecessary burdens and enhance focus on key priorities.
Amendment 209 #
2024/2109(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls for FP10 to be a stand-alone EU programme, within highly anticipated Competitiveness Fund as announced by President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen in her speech on July 17, 2024, in Strasbourg, dedicated to EU research excellence, with a substantially higher budget that is sufficient for achieving the 3 % GDP spending target and for funding at least 75 % of the excellent proposals submitted; recommends that FP10 focus on three core objectives: (i) advanccreating thea European Research Arcompetition of ideas (ERA) with specific measures that address regional disparities and support under-represented Member States ii) supporting strategic collaborative research initiatives, which will be of utmost importance for European industry, startups and SMEs closing their innovation capacities, competitiveness gap; (iii) creatadvancing athe European competition of ideas, and (iii) supporting strategic, large-scale collaborative research initiatives; recommends that FP10 be structured in three parts, each addressing one of the three core objResearch Area (ERA) to foster cooperation and strengthen synergies at the EU-level to ensure applicants for funding across Member States have the necessary knowledge to navigate the application processes effectives;ly.
Amendment 214 #
2024/2109(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls for FP10 to be a stand-alone EU programme dedicated to EU research excellence, with a substantially higher budget that is sufficient for achieving the 3 % GDP spending target and for funding at least 75 % of the excellent proposals submitted; recommends that FP10 focus on three core objectives: (i) advancing the European Research Area (ERA) with specific measures that address regional disparities and support under-represented Member States in their innovation capacities, (ii) creating a European competition of ideas, and (iii) supporting strategic, large-scale collaborative research initiatives; recommends that FP10 be structured in three parts, each addressing one of the three core objectives;.
Amendment 240 #
2024/2109(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 – point a – point i
Paragraph 15 – point a – point i
i. be oriented towards facilitating the best science, technology development and innovation;
Amendment 244 #
2024/2109(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 – point a – point ii
Paragraph 15 – point a – point ii
Amendment 257 #
2024/2109(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 – point a – point iii
Paragraph 15 – point a – point iii
iii. contribute to EU priorities, but on the terms of science and innovation rather than on the terms of policymakers;
Amendment 294 #
2024/2109(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Believes that an expanded European Research Council (ERC) and European Innovation Council (EIC) should be at the heart of the part of FP10 dealing with a European competition of ideas a; recommends that this part should receive half of the FP10 budget; recommends thatcross-border collaboration should be encouraged and these programmes be designed so that they create a European, bottom-up funnel for innovation to develop quickly from fundamental science to innovation scale- up; as well as innovative ecosystems, consisting of universities, research and technology organisations, industry, startups, SMEs and investors, to translate results of research and development into the market in terms of products and value creation; considers that the EIC can only succeed if it can both offer blended finance as a single project and act with the same speed and agility as private actors on the venture capitalist market through a tailor-made legal entity for implementation; underlines that the strengthened autonomy and self- governance of both the ERC and the EIC are crucial to achieving this;
Amendment 305 #
2024/2109(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Urges the Commission to improve the synergies between FP10 and European sectoral policies, in particular with the future new Industrial Policy and the next Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs).
Amendment 316 #
2024/2109(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Urges the Commission to design the part of FP10 on strategic deployment such that itresearch, technology development and deployment, and to focuses on a limited number of pan-European research initiatives with 2040 set as the time horizon and which; strengthening the European competitiveness and societal resilience requires cross-border collaboration due to the scale and complexity of the issue in question; believes that this part should consider that these initiatives could take the form of societal missions which address socio-economic and/or ecological challenges, technology missions to accelerate the development of strategic technologies in Europe, or joint undertakings to secure joint investments by industry, Member States, the EU and othe EUr relevant partnerships to support research- based competitiveness and the resilience of key sectors in the European economy; believes that all of these initiatives should receive a budget of between EUR 2.5 and 5 billion;adequate financing.
Amendment 113 #
2024/0017(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) adequate resources and procedures shall be provided for the screening authority to determine whether it has jurisdiction over a foreign investment filed for authorisation and to carry out an initial review followed by, where necessary, an in-depth investigation to determine whether that foreign investment is likely to negatively affect security or public order, taking into account at least the criteria laid down in Article 13. The purpose of the in-depth investigation shall be, in particular, to determine whether a screening decision as referred to in Article 14(1) is appropriate and to determine its content.
Amendment 116 #
2024/0017(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the screening authority shall monitor and ensure compliance with the screening mechanism and screening decisions. In particular, it shall put in place adequate procedures and resources to identify and prevent circumvention of the screening mechanism and screening decisions;
Amendment 120 #
2024/0017(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point e
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) foreign investors, foreign investors’ subsidiaries in the Union through which the foreign investment is carried out and undertakings concerned by a screening decision shall have the possibility to seek judicial recourse against that screening decision. Member States shall implement a harmonized appeal mechanism;
Amendment 132 #
2024/0017(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i
(i) the foreign investor or the foreign investor’s subsidiary in the Union is directly or indirectly controlled by the government, including state bodies, regional or local authorities or armed forces, of a third country, including through ownership structure, significant funding, special rights or state-appointed directors or managers. In cases where the ownership structure is opaque or unclear, the investment shall be notified as a precaution;
Amendment 138 #
2024/0017(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) applicants requesting an authorisation shall file their requests for authorisation in all relevant Member States on the samewithin 3 calendar days, and each request for authorisation shall make reference to the other requests;
Amendment 139 #
2024/0017(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) if the requests for authorisation concern a foreign investment meeting any of the conditions set out in Article 5(1), the respective Member States shall send their notifications to the cooperation mechanism on the same day after the last Member State received its request for authorisation and within the deadline laid down in point (a) of paragraph 1 of this Article;
Amendment 140 #
2024/0017(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – title
Article 7 – title
Comments by Member States and opinions, alerts and Decisions by the Commission on notified foreign investments
Amendment 152 #
2024/0017(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6
Article 7 – paragraph 6
6. Following the receipt of a comment pursuant to paragraph 1, the Member State shall set up a meeting with the Member States who issued comments to discuss how to best address the risks identified. If the Member State where the foreign investment is planned or completed disagrees with the risks identified or, if applicable, the measure proposed with the comment, the Member States shall aim to identify alternative solutions. Where the comment concerns a multi-country transaction, the other Member States who notified the foreign investment shall also be invited to discuss whether the intended outcomes are compatible with one another and, where applicable, the intended conditions are able to address identified cross-border risks adequately. The Commission shall be invited to any such meetings.
Amendment 154 #
2024/0017(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 7 a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. If no alternative solution is reached in Paragraph 6, the Commission may alert the Member State where the foreign investment is planned of its concern that the foreign investment is likely to negatively affect the security and public order of another Member State. The Commission may only alert upon approval of the affected other Member State. Upon receipt of such an alert, the Member State where the foreign investment is planned shall not adopt the intended screening decision for a period of 30 calendar days, unless the Member States involved and the Commission agree on mitigating measures or reach an alternative solution.
Amendment 155 #
2024/0017(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 7 b (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 7 b (new)
7 b. Where the Commission has issued an alert in accordance with Paragraph 7a and no mitigating measures or alternative solution is agreed upon after 30 calendar days, it may, within a period of 30 calendar days, adopt a Decision finding the intended screening decision to be incompatible with this Directive and requiring the Member State concerned to refrain from adopting it, and if such measure has been adopted, to repeal it. Such a Decision may only be adopted if the Commission can show that the intended screening decision negatively affects the security and public order of another Member State, and upon the latter's approval.
Amendment 173 #
2024/0017(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 8 – point b a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 8 – point b a (new)
(b a) The comments, opinions, alerts and Decisions issued by other Member States or the Commission as well as the written explanation from the Member State where the foreign investment is planned, will be enclosed in the secure database set up pursuant to Article 7(10). If certain information may not be shared according to Paragraph 11, the database shall at least include a reference to the comments, opinions and written explanations, and the involved parties.
Amendment 180 #
2024/0017(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 10
Article 7 – paragraph 10
10. The Commission shall set up a secure database made available to all Member States with information on the foreign investments assessed by the cooperation mechanism and the outcome of the assessments under the national screening mechanisms, including information about the relevant screening decisions. The Commission shall upload to that database the information it has at its disposal since 12 October 2020, including relevant business intelligence it has procured and verified from commercial vendors. By [date of application of this Regulation] Member States shall upload to that database the information at their disposal about the outcome of the relevant procedure under their own screening mechanisms. They may also provide additional explanations.
Amendment 181 #
2024/0017(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 10 a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. The Commission shall develop a business intelligence capability to inform the Member State screening authorities, develop coordinated risk assessments and support a Union FDI capacity-building programme through the FDI Expert Group, offering best practices, lessons learned and common training programmes for officials of the Member States. This requires the Commission to have the appropriate technical and human resources, as well as the financial resources to procure commercial business intelligence from private vendors.
Amendment 184 #
2024/0017(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new)
(d a) the meeting referred to in Article 7(6) shall occur within 30 calendar days following the opinion or comment.
Amendment 185 #
2024/0017(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d b (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d b (new)
(d b) where the Commission reserves the right to issue an alert referred to in Article 7(7a), the respective alert shall be sent to the notifying Member State via the secure and encrypted system referred to in Article 12(4) no later than 15 days following the meeting referred to in Article 7(6).
Amendment 188 #
2024/0017(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
The notifying Member State shall at least take their screening decision only after the deadlines referred to in points (a)-(d) have expirc) have expired. If the Commission reserves the right to issue an opinion, alert or Decision, the decision may only take place after the respective deadlines in points (da), (dc) and (dd) have expired, unless an alternative solution is reached.
Amendment 200 #
2024/0017(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the name of the investor, the global ultimate owner of the investor and the Union target, the ownership structure of the investor and, where applicable, of the corporate group to which the investor is a part, and whether they are subject to restrictive measures or were involved in a foreign investment previously screened by a Member State and not authorized or only authorized with conditions;
Amendment 202 #
2024/0017(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall provide the necessary resources, legal and administrative means for their efficient and effective participation in the cooperation mechanismto carry out, in an effective and efficient manner, the tasks assigned to them to fulfil the objectives of this Regulation, especially their efficient and effective participation in the cooperation mechanism and ability to effectively monitor and ensure compliance with the screening mechanism and screening decisions.
Amendment 206 #
2024/0017(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall determine, for the purposes of taking a screening decision pursuant to Article 14 or issuing a duly motivated comment pursuant to Article 7(1) or Article 9(7), whether a foreign investment is likely to negatively affect security or public order. They may use the risk evaluation form developed by the Commission.
Amendment 210 #
2024/0017(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) the security, confidentiality, integrity and functioning of critical infrastructure, whether physical or virtualsectors of high criticality and other critical sectors as defined in Annex I and II of Directive (EU) 2022/2557, whether physical or virtual, including the land and property critical to the use of such critical infrastructure; in that context, based on the information available, it shall also be assessed whether the foreign investment is likely to negatively affect the resilience of any of the critical entities they have identified under Directive (EU) 2022/2557 of the European Parliament and of the Council20 as well as entities in scope of Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the European Parliament and of the Council21 . The results of the Union level coordinated security risk assessments shall be taken into account, including those of critical supply chains carried out in accordance with Article 22(1) of Directive (EU) 2022/2555 shall also be, which taken into account. ; both technical and non-technical risk factors, such as undue influence by a third country on suppliers _________________ 20 Directive (EU) 2022/2557 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 on the resilience of critical entities and repealing Council Directive 2008/114/EC (OJ L 333, 27.12.2022, p. 164–198, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2557/oj). 21 Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 on measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the Union, amending Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and Directive (EU) 2018/1972, and repealing Directive (EU) 2016/1148 (OJ L 333, 27.12.2022, p. 80–152, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2555/oj).
Amendment 214 #
2024/0017(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point c
Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) the continuity of supply of critical inputs and the resilience of supply chains, including by taking into consideration the risk assessments in Article 24 of Regulation 2024/1252 ;
Amendment 220 #
2024/0017(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point d
Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point d
(d) the protection of sensitive information, including personal data and intellectual property, in particular with regard to the ability of the foreign investor to access, control, and otherwise process such personal datasensitive information, or
Amendment 224 #
2024/0017(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 4 – point e
Article 13 – paragraph 4 – point e
(e) whether the foreign investor, a natural person or entity controlling the foreign investor, the beneficial owner of the foreign investor, any of the subsidiaries of the foreign investor, or any other party owned or controlled by, or acting on behalf or at the direction of the foreign investor is likely to pursue a third country’s policy objectivnegatively affect the security interests or restrictive measures of the Union or its Member States, or facilitate the development of a third country’s military capabilities.
Amendment 225 #
2024/0017(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 4 – point e a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 4 – point e a (new)
(e a) whether the foreign investor or any of its subsidiaries are established in a third country whose legislation allows arbitrary access to any kind of company operations or data, including commercially sensitive data, and can impose obligations for intelligence purposes without democratic checks and balances, oversight mechanisms, due process or the right to appeal to an independent court or tribunal.
Amendment 226 #
2024/0017(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 4 – point e b (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 4 – point e b (new)
(e b) whether the foreign investor or any of its subsidiaries or the third country in which it is established is subject to restrictive measures or whether it has a flawed rule of law or human rights protection track record or an aggressive civil-military fusion strategy;
Amendment 227 #
2024/0017(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. The Commission, in cooperation with the FDI Expert Group, may carry out a coordinated risk assessment relating to a specific sector, critical technology or foreign investor and the level of control established by third countries, to inform screening decisions of the Member States. The coordinated risk assessment shall be added to the risk evaluation template in Paragraph 1, shared and made available in the secure database set up pursuant to Article 7(10) and shall be taken into account by Member States when determining whether an investment is likely to negatively affect security or public order.
Amendment 231 #
2024/0017(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2
Article 16 – paragraph 2
2. On the basis of the information received in accordance with paragraph 1, and based on its assessment of trends and developments, the Commission shall provide an annual report on implementation of this Regulation to the European Parliament and to the Council. It shall include an overview of the information in paragraph 1 per Member State. That report shall be made public.