7 Amendments of Edina TÓTH related to 2020/2262(INI)
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls the importance, for a properlywell- functioning and competitive internal market, of effective better law- making tools that take subsidiarity and proportionality fully into account when drawing up scientifically based and balanced legislation, particularly for consumers and SMEs;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Points out that the elements of subsidiarity and proportionality have to be taken into account as important preconditions when designing possible future EU legislation; once and if the EU added value is established, it should consistently reflect market integration and cross-border ambition, the need to reduce regulatory and administrative barriers, the necessity to be future-proof; recalls that one harmonised rule at European level reduces administrative burdens in all Member States as it replaces 27 diverging rules reducing the internal market fragmentation;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Reminds that digital innovation develops fast and that entrepreneurs are driving the digital agenda; therefore it is of key importance to provide future proof rules that are digital by default and that keep the pace of digital innovation; calls on the Commission to always take into account futureproof digital elements when assessing subsidiarity and proportionality in internal market legislation and in the related impact assessments;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
Paragraph 5 c (new)
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 d (new)
Paragraph 5 d (new)
5d. Underlines that according to the three Commission’s reports 2017, 2018 and 2019 on the application of the principle of subsidiarity and proportionality, there is the need to improve the quality of the impact assessments when it comes to both elements; subsidiarity and proportionality are important preconditions for an effective and balanced EU legislation that can be beneficial for a well-functioning internal market;
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 e (new)
Paragraph 5 e (new)
5e. Points out that all EU regulatory measures should always be accompanied by universal impact assessments that take into account in an effective and thorough way the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality; stresses that only regulatory measures that are based on improved impact assessments can be beneficial for both consumers and businesses within the internal market and can trigger innovation, encourage investments, reinforcing European competitiveness and ultimately being instrumental in strengthening consumer protection; stresses furthermore that improved impact assessments should clearly strengthen the SMEs fitness check element;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 f (new)
Paragraph 5 f (new)
5f. Stresses that all impact assessments, evaluations and fitness checks should carry out an analysis on subsidiarity and proportionality; on subsidiarity it is crucial to assess whether action at national, regional or local level would be sufficient to achieve the objectives pursued and whether action at EU level would provide added value compared to action at national level; on proportionality that the content and form of EU action must not exceed what is necessary to meet the pursued objectives ensuring that the approach chosen and the intensity of the regulatory action are necessary to achieve its objectives; calls on the Commission to take further steps in the direction of proper independent impact assessments and of improving the quality of the above analysis in order to make the EU internal market legislation more effective;