BETA

42 Amendments of Etelka BARSI-PATAKY related to 2008/0147(COD)

Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 6
(6) In the road transport sector, tolls as distance based charges for the use of infrastructure constitute a fair and efficient economic instrument to achieve this objective since they have a direct relation with the use of infrastructure and can vary according to the distance travelled, the environmental performance of vehicles and the place and time of use of vehicles and therefore can be set at a level which reflects the cost of pollution and congestion caused by the actual use of vehicles. Moreover, tolls do not create any distortion of competition within the internal market since they are payable by all operators irrespective of their Member State of origin or establishment and in proportion to the intensity of use of the road network.
2008/11/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 9
(9) The model devised by the Commission for calculating the costs of traffic-based air and noise pollution and congestion external costs provides reliable methods and a range of unit values which can already serve as a basis for the calculation of road user charges.
2008/11/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 14
(14) Tolls based on distance travelled should be allowed to include an external cost element based on the cost of traffic- based air and noise pollution. Furthermore, on roads that are usually congested and during peak periods congestion costs which are mostly borne at local level should also be allowed to be recovered through the external cost charge. The external cost element included in tolls should be allowed to be added to the cost of infrastructure, provided that certain conditions are respected in the calculation of costs so as to avoid undue charging.
2008/11/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 15
(15) To better reflect the cost of traffic- based air and noise pollution, and congestion, the external cost charge should vary according to the type of roads, type of vehicles and time periods such as daily, weekly or seasonal peak and off peak periods and night period.
2008/11/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 16
(16) The smooth functioning of the internal market requires a Community framework in order to ensure that road charges set on the basis of the local cost of traffic-based air and noise pollution and congestion are transparent, proportionate and non- discriminatory. This requires common charging principles, calculation methods and unit values of external costs based on acknowledged scientific methods together with mechanisms for notifying and reporting tolling schemes to the Commission.
2008/11/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 24
(24) In accordance with the transport policy objectives of this Directive, the additional revenue generated from an external cost charge should be used for projects with a broad Community interest and designed to promote sustainable mobility at largeaiming to reduce the external costs to the transport sector on which the charge is imposed. Such projects should therefore relate to facilitating efficient pricing, reducing road transport pollution at source, mitigating its effects, improving CO2 and energy performance of vehicles, and developing alternative infrastructure for transport users. It includes, for example, Intelligent Transport Systems and Services (ITS), research and development on cleaner vehicles and the implementation of the transport part of the action plans under Council Directive 96/62/EC of 27 September 1996 on ambient air quality assessment and management and Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise , which may comprise measures to mitigate traffic-based noise and air pollution around large infrastructure and in agglomerations. Earmarking this revenue does not release Member States from the obligation laid down in Article 88(3) of the Treaty to notify the Commission of certain national measures, nor does it prejudge the outcome of any procedures initiated under Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty.
2008/11/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 25 a (new)
(25a) The Commission should take all necessary measures to ensure the introduction of a truly interoperable European electronic toll collecting system, in accordance with Directive 2004/52/EC.
2008/11/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 1
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 2 – point bb
(bb) 'external cost charge' means a charge levied through a toll for the purpose of recovering the costs incurred by a Member State related to traffic-based air pollution, and traffic-based noise pollution and congestion;
2008/11/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 2
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7b – paragraph 2
2. The external cost charge shall be related to the cost of traffic-based air pollution, the cost of traffic-based noise pollution, or both. On road sections subject to congestion the external cost charge may also include the cost of congestion during the periods when these road sections are usually congested.
2008/11/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 2
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7c – paragraph 1
1. The external cost charge shall vary according to the type of road and EURO emission class, and also according to the time period in cases where the charge includes the cost of congestion or traffic- based noise pollution.
2008/11/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 2
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7f – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) with the exception of tolls charged for congestion no toll is more than 100% above the toll charged during the cheapest period of the day, type of day or season.
2008/11/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 2
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7f – paragraph 3 – point c a (new)
(ca) tolls charged for congestion shall not exceed by more than 200% the toll charged during the cheapest period of the day, type of day or season; where the whole amount of congestion revenues are spent explicitly to reduce congestion by using ITS solutions on those roads where the congestion charges were levied, the congestion toll shall not exceed by more than 400% the toll charged during the cheapest period of the day, type of day or season.
2008/11/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 2
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7i – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. As soon as the technical operability of toll collecting services based on the Galileo satellite positioning system is finalised, external cost charges shall be levied and collected by an interoperable European electronic toll collecting system as set out in Directive 2004/52/EC.
2008/11/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 4
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
2. A Member State in which an external cost charge is levied shall ensure that the revenue generated by the charge is earmarked for measures aimed at facilitating efficient pricing, reducing road transport pollution at source, mitigating its effects, improving CO2 and energy performance of road transport vehicles, and developing alternative infrastructure for road transport users in order to reduce the environmental burden of this mode of transport.
2008/11/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 4
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
A Member State in which an infrastructure charge is levied shall determine the use to be made of revenue generated by that charge. To enable the transport network to be developed as a whole, revenue from charges should be used to benefit the respective transport sector and optimise the entire transport system."that is being charged.
2008/11/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 6
(6) In the road transport sector, tolls as distance based charges for the use of infrastructure constitute a fair and efficient economic instrument to achieve this objective since they have a direct relation with the use of infrastructure and can vary according to the distance travelled, the environmental performance of vehicles and the place and time of use of vehicles and therefore can be set at a level which reflects the cost of pollution and congestion caused by the actual use of vehicles. Moreover, tolls do not create any distortion of competition within the internal market since they are payable by all operators irrespective of their Member State of origin or establishment and in proportion to the intensity of use of the road network.
2008/11/25
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 6
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
2. No later than 31 December 2013, the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation and effects of this Directive, in particular as regards the effectiveness of the provisions on the recovery of the costs related to congestion and traffic- based pollution and on the inclusion of vehicles of more than 3.5 and less than 12 tonnes. The report shall also assess:
2008/11/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Annex
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex IIIa – point 1 – subparagraph 2 – bullet 1
• vehicles' use of the roads where the external cost charge is applied generates environmental damage and congestion higher than that generated on average on other parts of the road infrastructure network that are not subject to a external cost charge, or
2008/11/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Annex
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex IIIa – point 2 – subparagraph 2
Where applicable, it shall also notify the Commission of the exact time periods corresponding to the night period and to the various daily, weekly or seasonal peak periods during which a higher external cost charge may be imposed to reflect greater congestion or greater noise annoyance.
2008/11/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Annex
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex IIIa – point 2 – subparagraph 3
The classification of roads and the definition of time periods shall be based on objective criteria related to the level of exposure of the roads and their vicinities to congestion and pollution such as population density, the yearly number of pollution peaks measured in accordance with Directive 96/62/EC, the average daily and hourly traffic and the level of service (percentage of the day or the year when road usage is close to or above capacity, average delays and/or queues lengths). The criteria used shall be included in the notification.
2008/11/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Annex
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex IIIa – point 3 – subparagraph 4
The independent authority shall monitor the effectiveness of the charging scheme in reducing environmental damage arising from road transport and in relieving congestion where it is applied. It shall regularly adjust the charging structure and the specific amount of the charge set for a given class of vehicle, type of road and period of time to the changes in transport demand.
2008/11/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Annex
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex IIIa – point 4 – paragraph 4.3
On congested roads, a Member State may choose to include all or part of the cost of congestion in the external cost charge provided that the Member State demonstrates that the congestion cost imposed by a vehicle on other users exceeds the infrastructure development cost already charged for this vehicle. In such a case, the independent authority shall calculate the chargeable congestion cost for the different periods of time by applying the following formula or by taking the unit values in Table 3 if the latter are lower. CCV = MEC deleted VOTxQ (v(Qo) − IDC MEC (Q) = where – CCV chargeable congestion cost (euro/vehicle.kilometre) – IDC infrastructure development cost already charged (euro/vehicle.kilometre) – Qo optimal hourly traffic (vehicle/hour) – MEC(Q) marginal external cost of congestion (euro/vehicle.kilometre) – VOT value of time (euro/hour.vehicle) – Q average hourly traffic (vehicle) – ∆Q small change in hourly traffic – v(Q) average traffic speed (kilometre/hour) The average daily traffic shall assume equivalence factor between heavy goods vehicles and passengers cars of no more than 3. The optimal hourly traffic shall be computed by iteratively raising the cost until equilibrium is reached between the hourly traffic and the marginal external cost of congestion. Alternatively, the ratio between the chargeable congestion charge (CCV) and the marginal external cost of congestion (MEC) shall be 0.5. The speed-flow function shall be based on standard engineering curves. The value of time shall be based on state of the art surveys of the willingness to pay. Table 3: Chargeable congestion cost of vehicles (CCV) Values in euro cents, 2000 Source: Estimated from the "Handbook on the estimation of external cost in the transport sector", table 7 Time period A is an off peak period with stable flow of traffic Time period B is a peak period or close to peak period with unstable flow of traffic Time period C is an extreme peak period with forced or breakdown flow of traffic All parameters, data and other information necessary to understand how the chargeable congestion cost is calculated shall bev(Q − ∆Q) x v(Q)² ∆Q
2008/11/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 9
(9) The model devised by the Commission for calculating the costs of traffic-based air and noise pollution and congestion external costs provides reliable methods and a range of unit values which can already serve as a basis for the calculation of road user charges.
2008/11/25
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 14
(14) Tolls based on distance travelled should be allowed to include an external cost element based on the cost of traffic- based air and noise pollution. Furthermore, on roads that are usually congested and during peak periods congestion costs which are mostly borne at local level should also be allowed to be recovered through the external cost charge. The external cost element included in tolls should be allowed to be added to the cost of infrastructure, provided that certain conditions are respected in the calculation of costs so as to avoid undue charging.
2008/11/25
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 15
(15) To better reflect the cost of traffic- based air and noise pollution, and congestion, the external cost charge should vary according to the type of roads, type of vehicles and time periods such as daily, weekly or seasonal peak and off peak periods and night period.
2008/11/25
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 16
(16) The smooth functioning of the internal market requires a Community framework in order to ensure that road charges set on the basis of the local cost of traffic-based air and noise pollution and congestion are transparent, proportionate and non-discriminatory. This requires common charging principles, calculation methods and unit values of external costs based on acknowledged scientific methods together with mechanisms for notifying and reporting tolling schemes to the Commission.
2008/11/25
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 24
(24) In accordance with the transport policy objectives of this Directive, the additional revenue generated from an external cost charge should be used for projects with a broad Community interest and designed to promote sustainable mobility at largeaiming to reduce the external costs of the transport sector for which the charge is imposed. Such projects should therefore relate to facilitating efficient pricing, reducing road transport pollution at source, mitigating its effects, improving CO2 and energy performance of vehicles, and developing alternative infrastructure for transport users. It includes, for example, Intelligent Transport Systems and Services (ITS), research and development on cleaner vehicles and the implementation of the transport part of the action plans under Council Directive 96/62/EC of 27 September 1996 on ambient air quality assessment and management and Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise, which may comprise measures to mitigate traffic-based noise and air pollution around large infrastructure and in agglomerations. Earmarking this revenue does not release Member States from the obligation laid down in Article 88(3) of the Treaty to notify the Commission of certain national measures, nor does it prejudge the outcome of any procedures initiated under Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty.
2008/11/25
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 25 a (new)
(25a) The Commission should take all necessary measures to ensure the introduction of a truly interoperable European electronic toll collecting system, in accordance with Directive 2004/52/EC.
2008/11/25
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 1
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 2 – point b b
(bb) ‘external cost charge’ means a charge levied through a toll for the purpose of recovering the costs incurred by a Member State related to traffic-based air pollution, and traffic-based noise pollution and congestion;
2008/11/25
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 2
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7 b – paragraph 2
2. The external cost charge shall be related to the cost of traffic-based air pollution, the cost of traffic-based noise pollution, or both. On road sections subject to congestion the external cost charge may also include the cost of congestion during the periods when these road sections are usually congested.
2008/11/25
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 2
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7c – paragraph 1
1. The external cost charge shall vary according to the type of road and EURO emission class, and also according to the time period in cases where the charge includes the cost of congestion or traffic- based noise pollution.
2008/12/11
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 2
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7f – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) with the exception of tolls charged for congestion, no toll is more than 100% above the toll charged during the cheapest period of the day, type of day or season.
2008/12/11
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 302 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 2
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7f – paragraph 3 – point c a (new)
(ca) tolls charged on congestion shall not exceed with more than 200% the toll charged during the cheapest period of the day, type of day or season. In case the whole amount of congestion revenues are spent explicitly to reduce congestion by using ITS solutions on those roads where the congestion charges were levied, then toll charged on congestion shall not exceed with more than 400% the toll charged during the cheapest period of the day, type of day or season.
2008/12/11
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 344 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 2
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7i – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. As soon as the operability of toll collecting services based on the Galileo satellite positioning system is technically worked out, external cost charges shall be levied and collected by an interoperable European electronic toll collecting system as specified in Directive 2004/52/EC.
2008/12/11
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 361 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 4
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
2. A Member State in which an external cost charge is levied shall ensure that the revenue generated by the charge is earmarked for measures aimed at facilitating efficient pricing, reducing road transport pollution at source, mitigating its effects, improving CO2 and energy performance of road transport vehicles, and developing alternative infrastructure for road transport users in order to reduce the environmental burden of this mode of transport.
2008/11/26
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 381 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 4
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
A Member State in which an infrastructure charge is levied shall determine the use to be made of revenue generated by that charge. To enable the transport network to be developed as a whole, revenue from charges should be used to benefit the respective transport sector and optimise the entire transport systemthat is being charged.
2008/11/26
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 401 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 6
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. No later than 31 December 2013, the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation and effects of this Directive, in particular as regards the effectiveness of the provisions on the recovery of the costs related to congestion and traffic- based pollution and on the inclusion of vehicles of more than 3.5 and less than 12 tonnes. The report shall also assess:
2008/11/26
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 430 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Annex
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex IIIa – point 1 – subparagraph 2 – bullet point 1
vehicles’ use of the roads where the external cost charge is applied generates environmental damage and congestion higher than that generated on average on other parts of the road infrastructure network that are not subject to an external cost charge, or
2008/11/27
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 438 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Annex
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex IIIa – point 2 – subparagraph 2
Where applicable, it shall also notify the Commission of the exact time periods corresponding to the night period and to the various daily, weekly or seasonal peak periods during which a higher external cost charge may be imposed to reflect greater congestion or greater noise annoyance.
2008/11/27
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 443 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Annex
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex IIIa – point 2 – subparagraph 3
The classification of roads and the definition of time periods shall be based on objective criteria related to the level of exposure of the roads and their vicinities to congestion and pollution such as population density, and the yearly number of pollution peaks measured in accordance with Directive 96/62/EC, the average daily and hourly traffic and the level of service (percentage of the day or the year when road usage is close to or above capacity, average delays and/or queues lengths). The criteria used shall be included in the notification.
2008/11/27
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 457 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Annex
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex IIIa – point 3 – subparagraph 4
The independent authority shall monitor the effectiveness of the charging scheme in reducing environmental damage arising from road transport and in relieving congestion where it is applied. It shall regularly adjust the charging structure and the specific amount of the charge set for a given class of vehicle, type of road and period of time to the changes in transport demand.
2008/11/27
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 512 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Annex
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex IIIa – point 4 – point 4.3 – subparagraph 1
On congested roads, a Member State may choose to include all or part of the cost of congestion in the external cost charge provided that the Member State demonstrates that the congestion cost imposed by a vehicle on other users exceeds the infrastructure development cost already charged for this vehicle. In such a case, the independent authority shall calculate the chargeable congestion cost for the different periods of time by applying the following formula or by taking the unit values in Table 3 if the latter are lower.deleted
2008/11/27
Committee: TRAN