5 Amendments of Edit HERCZOG related to 2008/2186(DEC)
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 251
Paragraph 251
251. Is concernedNotes that, according to the Court’s report, the recruitment practice in the executive agencies is to hire at lower grades for temporary posts, and to require contract staff to have more years of experience, than is the case as regards contract staff with similar tasks in the Commission; feelnotes that this might reduces the attractiveness of the job positions, despite the offer of renewable contracts in contrast to the maximum contract term of three years applicable to Commission contract staff, and warnnotes that this could affectresult in compromises in the quality of the operations of a gthe executiven agency; ies concerned;
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 252
Paragraph 252
252. Considers that future examinRequests the Commission to provide information ofn this issue could include an evaluation of any possible negative impact on the work of the agencies of shorter-term contracts and higher staff turnovere different contractual time periods applicable for the different contractual tasks and the duration of the different contractual employments in the executive agencies;
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 253
Paragraph 253
253. Considers that one of the major potential benefits of an executive agency is the recruitment of specialised staff, and therefore requests the Commission to review the recruitment criteria and conditions of the agencies’ stafftake measures to improve and simplify the recruitment of the agencies’ staff; moreover, requests the Commission to take the specific recruitment needs of the executive agencies into consideration;
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 254
Paragraph 254
254. Requests the Commission to present a detailed comparative analysisinformation ofn the factors governnumber of contract staff employed ing the wage differential, taking into consideration the different requirements wiexecutive agencies and the tasks assigned to them and the salary levels corresponding th eregard to skills and educational qualifications, in respect of both the Commission staff and the staff of the executive agenciesto, as well as an overview on how much experience is required for each employment grade; moreover, requests the Commission to present information on the different cases in which suitable staff could not be rapidly found and on how much delay occurred in the staff recruitment, as well as an analysis of the reasons for the delay;
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 255 – point b
Paragraph 255 – point b
(b) to undertake a peer-review with a view to identifying the success factors and conclusions which led to better results at the best performing executive agencies and to applying the lessons learned to all programmes which continue to be managed by the Commission services;