BETA

6 Amendments of Vladimír MAŇKA related to 2008/2061(INI)

Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Draws attention to the urgent need for a clear definition of 'best practices', also including the principle of good governance; considers, in this connection, thatthe introduction of quantitative and qualitative performance indicators common to all Member States should be introduced andfor best practices in regional development that are cost-benefit ratio should be determined for projectmmon to all Member States;
2009/01/12
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to set up a unit in the Directorate-General for Budgetcarry out an investigation to measure the effectiveness and transferability of practices relating to the administrative, financial and IT management of projects;
2009/01/12
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for an expert report in relation to the work of each management authority, in particular with a view to the end of the 2007-2013 programming period, to be completed a reasonable length of time before the approval of a new financial framework so as to enable the legislator to gain a better understanding of its work within the renegotiation of the next financial framework;
2009/01/12
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Demands that bureaucracy in the use of Structural Funds be kept to a minimum, and not needlessly increased by individual conditions imposed by the Member State;.
2009/01/12
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Reiterates its support for the goodbest practice aimed at ensuring that each Member State produces an annual national declaration of assurance covering Community funds coming under the shared management arrangement, and calls for this to become standard practice;
2009/01/12
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls for appropriate administrative resources to be allocated in the budgetaryunder the procedure to management authorities responsible for the European Social Fund in particular in order to ensure that microprojects fully meet eligibility requirements and that those responsible for projects understand the intentions of the European legislator.
2009/01/12
Committee: BUDG