BETA

6 Amendments of Jean-Paul GAUZÈS related to 2012/2040(INI)

Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Believes that further work on common technical standards wcould not only enhance the competitiveness of the European economy and the functioning of the internal market but would also bring security-related advantages in the form of common security standards, which would benefit both consumers and merchants;
2012/07/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that the separation of payment infrastructures from payment schemes cwould not necessarily increase competition as smaller players wnd that any technical constraints for market access should not be blocoked out due to technical constraintsat separately;
2012/07/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Points out that further standardisation to overcome technical barriers and national settlement and clearing requirements, is needed to promote cross-border acquiring, an arrangement which would increase competition and the choices available for merchants and could result in more cost- efficient payment methods for customers;
2012/07/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Urges that solutions to facilitate cross- border acquiring be actively sought, in view of its advantages to the internal market; expresses concern at existing barriers such as licensingnational and technical barriers, which should be abandonremoved;
2012/07/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Considers that the transparency of MIFs should be regulapromoted both in international and in national schemes, and that this could, together with easier access to cross-border acquiring, lead to lower MIFs as merchants could freely choose which payment schemes they wish to join;
2012/07/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Notes that co-badging which has been voluntarily entered upon into by both payment systems could be beneficial to consumers as it would result in fewer cards and a wider range of choicfacilitate national domestic schemes,' and wouldccess to the broader EU market encourageing competition;
2012/07/12
Committee: ECON