Activities of Jean-Marie CAVADA related to 2015/2040(INI)
Legal basis opinions (0)
Amendments (5)
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Points out that it is for the Commission to identify any conflict of interest which might prevent one of its Members from performing his or her duties, and takes the view, therefore, that the Commission should be in a position to check and guarantee the accuracy and completeness of the declarations of financial interests submitted by Commissioners-designate prior to their hearings before Parliament;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Takes the view that the hearings conducted by the committees responsible are important as a means not only of assessing nominees’ personalities and political priorities, but also of verifying their aptitude and ability to perform their intended duties; emphasises that nominees for posts as Commission Vice- Presidents should be treated in the same way as all other nominees;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Emphasises the need to achieve gender parity among the members of the College of Commissioners;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Takes the view that therearings should be more flexibility, especially as regards the time allowed fororganised in a more flexible way, in particular by doing away with the restrictions on their duration, which would allow time, for example, for spontaneous supplementary questions.;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 c (new)
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Takes the view that rules, in particular concerning deadlines, should be laid down to govern hearings of replacement nominees, so that the latter are not placed at a disadvantage vis-à-vis the Commissioners-designate originally heard; calls, therefore, for rules governing hearings of Commissioners- designate to be set out in an interinstitutional agreement;