BETA

Activities of Jean-Marie CAVADA related to 2017/2273(INI)

Legal basis opinions (0)

Amendments (11)

Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 19
– having regard to European Court of Auditors (ECA) Special Report No 17/2017 of November 2017 on the Commission’s intervention in the Greek financial crisis,deleted
2018/03/02
Committee: JURI
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas Article 3 of the TEU stipulates that the aims of the Union are, inter alia, to promote peace, its values and the well-being of its peoples and to work for the sustainable development of Europe based on balanced economic growth and price stability, a highly competitive social market economy, aiming at full employment and social progress, and a high level of protection and improvement of the quality of the environment, and that the Union shall combat social exclusion and discrimination, and promote social justice and protection, equality between women and men, solidarity between generations and protection of the rights of the child,
2018/03/02
Committee: JURI
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas the correct application of EU law guarantees the benefits of Union's policies to all European citizens and a level playing field for businesses;
2018/03/02
Committee: JURI
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that the large number of infringement procedures in 2016 shows that ensuring the timely and correct application of EU legislation in the Member States remains a serious challenge and priority; considers that some of those infringements are the result of the lack of resources dedicated to public administration in some Member States, sometimes as a result of ill-advised austerity measures;
2018/03/02
Committee: JURI
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses that Memoranda of Understanding concluded between the EU institutions and Member States are not considered EU acts, even if Member States are obliged thereunder to implement fiscal and tax policies for severe cutbacks;deleted
2018/03/02
Committee: JURI
Amendment 66 #
10. Notes that the duties conferred on the Commission and the European Central Bank (ECB) within the Treaty establishing the European Stability Mechanism (ESM), important as they are, do not entail any power to make decisions of their own, and that the activities pursued by those two institutions within the ESM Treaty commit the ESM alone and not the EU institutions9 ; _________________ 9 Idem, paragraph 51.deleted
2018/03/02
Committee: JURI
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Points out that major decisions for the EU, the Member States and its people, such as decisions on national budgets and reforms, are usually prepared in almost complete opacity and taken by ministers without adherence to basic transparency principles, often after very limited discussions and with no formal rules10 ; regrets that there is no accountability to Parliament for those decisions11 and encourages the competent institutions to change this situation; _________________ 10See, inter alia: http://www.pierremoscovici.fr/2017/09/02/ my-speech-at-the-ambrossetti-forum-the- future-of-the-euro/ 11 Ibid.deleted
2018/03/02
Committee: JURI
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Expresses concern that the robust fiscal measures (including reductions in expenditure on pensions, the health system and public administration) and reforms of tax policy and tax administration envisaged in the structural adjustment programmes and imposed on the Member States by the EU institutions have had negative effects, inter alia on labour, pension rights and employment12 , and on healthcare systems and the right to health and education13 ; _________________ 12See, inter alia: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/I EDebt/LabourRights/Greece.pdf; ECA Special Report No 17/2017. 13See, inter alia: http://www.kentikelenis.net/uploads/3/1/8/ 9/31894609/kentikelenis2017- structural_adjustment_and_health_a_con ceptual_framework_and_evidence_on_pat hways.pdfdeleted
2018/03/02
Committee: JURI
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission to enhance, where possible and necessary, the portion of the European Social Fund dedicinstruments designed to help Member Stateds to ‘enhancing institutional capacity of public authorities and stakeholders and efficient public administration’ (Thematic Objective 11)14 in order to promote social welfarecognize transposition problems, address them at an early stage of the infringement procedures and economic development, and to enhance the effectiveness of beneficial legislation; _________________ 14Article 3(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1304/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the European Social Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1081/2006; OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 470.help them find joined solutions and thus, enhance the effectiveness of EU legislation;
2018/03/02
Committee: JURI
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Recalls that the legislation which gives rise to the most flagrant infringement proceedings is the result of directives; recalls that regulations are directly and compulsorily applicable in all the Member States; calls, therefore, on the Commission to make use of regulations as far as possible whenever it considers issuing legislative proposals; considers that such an approach could mitigate the risk of over-regulation;
2018/03/02
Committee: JURI
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Recalls that preliminary rulings help to clarify the manner in which the law of the European Union is to be applied; considers that recourse to this procedure allows a uniform interpretation and implementation of European legislation; encourages, therefore, national courts to refer questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union in the event of doubt and thus prevent infringement proceedings;
2018/03/02
Committee: JURI