Activities of Nathalie GRIESBECK related to 2017/2068(INI)
Plenary speeches (1)
The fight against cybercrime (short presentation) FR
Shadow reports (1)
REPORT on the fight against cybercrime PDF (471 KB) DOC (90 KB)
Amendments (24)
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 23 a (new)
Citation 23 a (new)
- having regard of the work of the Joint Cyber Crime Action Taskforce (J- CAT)
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the 2016 IOCTA reveals that cybercrime is increasing in intensity, complexity and magnitude, that reported cybercrime exceeds traditional crime in some EU countries, that it extends to other areas of crime, such as human trafficking, that there has been a growing misuse of encryption and anonymisation tools and that ransomware attacks outnumber traditional malware threats such as Trojans;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Recital I a (new)
Ia. whereas the fight against cybercrime and against illegal activities online should not hinder the positive process provided by a free and open cyberspace, offering new possibilities for the sharing of knowledge and the promotion of political and social inclusion worldwide
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that the constantly changing nature of the cyber-threat landscape presents all stakeholders with serious legal and technological challenges; points, in particular, to the increasing misuse of privacy-enhancing technologies such as onion-routing and the Darknet, as well as to the growing threats posed by hackers sponsored by non- friendly foreign states or extremist political or religious organisations;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that the recourse of extremistcriminal and terrorist networks to cybercrime tools and services is still limited; highlights, however, that this is likely to change in light of the growing links between terrorism and organised crime and the wide availability of firearms and explosive precursors on the Darknet;
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Acknowledges that technological advances in encryption allow legitimate end-users to better protect their data, but points out that malicious users deploy the same techniques to conceal their criminal activities and identitithese techniques can be used to conceal identities and also to conceal criminal activities or for illegal purposes ;
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Stresses that Cybersecurity strategies and measures can only be sound and effective if it is based on fundamental rights and freedoms as enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and EU core values.
Amendment 203 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Stresses out the urgent need, in the fight against cybercrime, of more efforts on NIS education and training, by introducing training on NIS, on secure software development and personal data protection for computer science students and also NIS basic training for staff working in public administrations;
Amendment 208 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Takes the view that, in order to safeguard the security and integrity of our networks, services and personal data, the use of end-to-end encryption should be encouraged and, where necessary, be mandatory in accordance with the principle of security and privacy by design;
Amendment 213 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses that businesses should conduct regular vulnerability assessments, fixidentify existing vulnerabilities in their products or services and combat and fix these vulnerabilities ; businesses should also consistently report cyber- attacks;
Amendment 247 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
Amendment 267 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on the Commission to investigate the legal scope for improving the accountability of service providers and for imposing an obligation to respond to foreign EU law-enforcement requests;
Amendment 272 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Recognises that the current European and national legal frameworks can create challenges for service providers willing to comply with law enforcement authority requests ;calls on the Commission to improve the legal framework regarding this cooperation between service providers and law enforcement authorities, putting in place appropriate safeguards
Amendment 273 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19b. Underlines the absolute necessity to protect law enforcement databases from security incidents and unlawful access since this is a matter of concern for individuals and is concerned by the extraterritorial reach of law enforcement authorities to access data in the context of criminal investigations and underlines the need to implement strong rules in that matter.
Amendment 274 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 c (new)
Paragraph 19 c (new)
19c. believes, therefore, that tackling such risks requires concerted and effective cooperation between law enforcement authorities, the private sector, governments and independent supervisory data protection authorities; insists on the necessity to guarantee adequate security for personal data, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Directive (EU) 2016/680, as well as to minimise vulnerabilities through secured and decentralised database architectures;
Amendment 275 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 d (new)
Paragraph 19 d (new)
19 d. Calls on the Commission to propose options for initiatives to improve the efficiency and promote the use of Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties (MLATS) in order to counter the assumption of extraterritorial jurisdiction by third countries.
Amendment 277 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
Amendment 292 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Underlines that illegal online content should be removed immediately; welcomes, in this context, the progress achieved concerning the blocking and removal of illegal content online, but stresses the need for a stronger commitment on the part of platform service providers to respond quickly and effectively; recognizes in this regard the contribution of the EU internet forum
Amendment 312 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Urges the Member States to exchange best practices regardnot to impose any obligation on encryption providers that would result ing the circumvention of encryption and to cooperate, in consultation with the judiciary, in aligning the conditions for the lawful use of investigative tools online;weakening of the security of their network and services such as the creation or facilitation of back doors ; When the access to encrypted information is imperative for security and justice, then feasible solutions to decryption without weakening the protective mechanisms must be offered, both in legislation and through continuous technical evolution
Amendment 317 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Calls on the Member States to make a full use of lawful hacking and on the European Union to promote this instrument ; Stresses that lawful hacking must be a measure of last resort, which has to be necessary, proportionate, and in full compliance with fundamental rights and EU data protection and case law; calls on all Member States to establish clear rules regarding the prior and judicial authorisation process for lawful hacking activities, including restrictions on the use and duration of lawful hacking tools, to set up an oversight mechanism, and to provide effective legal remedies for the targets of these hacking activities;
Amendment 340 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28a. Calls on the Commission to set out clear definitions of the different types of cybercrime and to examine the necessity for a legislative instrument that will set minimum rules on the definitions and minimum penalties regarding cybercrimes
Amendment 355 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Underlines the importance of close cooperation between law enforcement authorities and the private sector on the issue of access to e-evidence; urges the Member States concerned to eliminate criminal law provisions prohibiting domestic service providers from responding to foreign law enforcement requests;
Amendment 363 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
Paragraph 31
31. Calls on the Commission to put forward a European legal framework for e- evidence, including harmonised rules to determine the status of a provider as domestic or foreign, and to impose an obligation on service providers to respond to requests from third countries, with a view to ensuring legal certainty for stakeholders and removing obstacles to cooperation;
Amendment 379 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 a (new)
Paragraph 33 a (new)
33a. Asks for the revision of the ENISA mandate and the reinforcement of the national cybersecurity agencies; calls for a reinforcement of the ENISA mandate, staff and resources, that should also include more links with Europol and industry stakeholders.