4 Amendments of Daniel CASPARY related to 2012/2094(INI)
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Is concerned that some citizens see the current system of copyright protection as a tool to ‘punish and withhold, instead of a tool to recognise and reward’;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls onAsks the Commission and the Council not to conclude trade agreements with countries where EU ICT companies are required to restrict access to web, when negotiating future trade agreements, to make sure that the freedom of EU ICT companies to conduct busitnes, remove user-generated content or provides or the fundamental rights of natural or legal personals information in ways tha the EU are not breach fundamental rights and curtail the freedom to conduct business; calls on the EU to minimisestricted directly or indirectly by corresponding obligations in these agreements; calls also, therefore, for the extra-territorial application of third-country legislation on EU citizens onlineto natural or legal persons in the EU to be minimised;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Underlines the need for more stringent supply-chain controls and corporate responsibility schemes in respect of trading in products – from equipment to mobile devices – and services, which can be used to curtail human rights and digital freedom; regards jamming and interception technology products and services as ‘single use’ items whose export should be subject to ex-ante approval.