BETA

8 Amendments of Ingeborg GRÄSSLE related to 2007/2052(DEC)

Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 61
61. Notes that the agency's administrative spending in 2006 accounted for a substantial proportion of its overall expenditure, making the effective and efficient performance of its tasks impossible;deleted
2008/03/06
Committee: CONT
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 62
Motion for a resolution 62. Notes that no strict logic was applied to the choice of location for the agency and that as a result a substantial volume of unnecessary additional costs has arisen;deleted
2008/03/06
Committee: CONT
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 63
63. Notes the unacceptable and frequently criticised overlaps between this agency's area of activity and that of other agencies; this is generating yet more additional costs, particularly as a result of the duplication of work in the administrative sphere;deleted
2008/03/06
Committee: CONT
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 64
64. Notes that it is not clear how this activity can be carried out on the basis of the small number of posts in the agency's establishment plan more efficiently and more effectively in a decentralised agency and in this location than in the Commission itself;deleted
2008/03/06
Committee: CONT
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 65
65. Notes that in the financial year 2006 the cost of privileges for agency staff made up more than 4% of the agency's final budget;deleted
2008/03/06
Committee: CONT
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 66
66. Notes that the cost of private travel for agency staff and members of their families is unacceptably high;deleted
2008/03/06
Committee: CONT
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 67
67. Notes that the agency's staff expenditure per post increased by 18% between the financial year 2006 and the 2008 preliminary draft budget;deleted
2008/03/06
Committee: CONT
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 68
68. Notes that the administrative board has an unacceptably high number of members, so that efficient decision- making is impossible;deleted
2008/03/06
Committee: CONT