7 Amendments of Ingeborg GRÄSSLE related to 2009/2002(BUD)
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Proposes thatCalls on the Commission should be granted the funds needed to conduct a study on the feasibility of harmonising and simplifying rules for beneficiaries in the European research sector and on the appropriateness of repayment rules based on flat-rate payment proceduresto take all measures necessary to implement the 7th Framework Programme in a swift and user-focused way;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Recalls its resolution on the transitional measures applicable to the budgetary procedure after the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty; stresses that those should not depart from the budgetary principles established for the annual budgetary procedure; proposes to treat all changes to Financial Regulation jointly in its 2010 tri-annual revision;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Calls for full use of the appropriations available to activities and policies under sub-heading 1a which foster sustainable growth and job creation and deliver solutions to European citizens namely by providing greater energy security, increasing support for research and innovation, particularly on clean energy technologies, promoting small and medium-sized enterprises and reinforcing life-long learning; recalls the importance of optimising the implementation of framework programmes and calls on the Commission to take into accountact on the Parliament's position as adopted in the discharge procedure for Commission 2007 (P6_TA(2009)0289) Nos. 113 through 123 on those implementation problems, in particular by simplifying recovery procedures through the use of appropriate flat-rate procedures and taking into account the good faith and legitimate expectations of beneficiaries;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Expresses its concern about the 7th Framework Programme rules, which deviate from the common nationally and internationally acknowledged and certified accounting and calculation methods, thus being incompatible with general business practices, and asks the Commission to remedy this state of affairs by adopting practices that allow for calculation and charging of average hourly rates per cost centre;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 14 b (new)
Paragraph 14 b (new)
14b. Urges the Commission to establish and to apply the necessary comprehensive and comprehensible criteria for approving certificates using a methodology which calculates both personnel and indirect costs;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 14 c (new)
Paragraph 14 c (new)
14c. Calls on the Commission to refrain, for the sake of legal certainty, from re- calculating the financial statements of projects under the 6th Framework Programme that it has already approved and settled, thus observing the rule of law;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Welcomes the creation of the European external action service, which, as a matter of urgency, must be subject to parliamentary scrutiny; and control in both budget and budgetary control matters; in that regard, stresses its demand for an all- encompassing and rapid communication of an overall strategy for the implementation of the external action service, including plans for future cooperation with Parliament and the Presidency of the Council as well as estimates on staff and administrative costs and other requirements and the possible savings with regard to synergies stemming from the joint use of facilities and personnel;