BETA

76 Amendments of Ingeborg GRÄSSLE related to 2009/2069(DEC)

Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Draws the attention to the need urgently to introduce a clear and transparent corporate governance system in Parliament defined as a set of responsibilities and practices exercised by Parliament's principal decision-makers (the Bureau, the Secretary-General and senior line management) with the aim of: - providing strategic direction, - ensuring that Parliament's objectives are achieved, - ascertaining that risks are managed appropriately, and - verifying that Parliament's resources are used responsibly;deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that Parliament is a complex organisation in which the boundary between political and administrative decisions is not always clear due to the multilayered character of the institution's governance structure and the fact that high-level administrative decision-makers are not always appointed on the basis of their managerial capabilities alone;
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Believes that complex governance structures and management procedures need more sophisticated internal control and risk management systems than less complex governance structures in order to ensure accountability and protect the political leadership and the administrative managers from financial and non-financial risks;
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Invites the competent services, therefore, to review and, if necessary, reinforce the minimum internal control standards in order to include lessons learned and to keep in line with developments in risk management and corporate governance; recalls that authorising departments are under an obligation to respect the standards in developing their internal control systems and implementing measures; invites the competent services to seek the opinion of its Committee on Budgetary Control before the revised minimum internal control standards is sent to the Bureau for review and approval;
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Stresses that the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty has increased Parliament's powers and the workload for its Members and their auxiliary staff; opines that the working conditions in all places of work should adequately reflect the increased need for labour and material; calls on its Secretary-General to submit plans for providing adequate office-space in particular in its Strasbourg offices, where the hygiene cubicles in the offices should be removed and a visitors' reception office should be created;
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. In that regard recalls its findings concerning the asbestos rehabilitation works, and asks its Secretary-General to report on the operational and financial results of the works and possible future needs for consequential remedial measures;
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution
Heading before paragraph 8
The discharge process - an occasion for learning and critical scrutiny
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Recognises that it is unusual for a public institution to discharge itself; sStresses that the added value of the parliamentary and public procedure leading up to Parliament's discharge of itself is the additional possibility for exercising, in public, a critical scrutiny of the institution's financial management and thereby facilitating European citizens' understanding of Parliament's particular set-up, governance structure and working methods;
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Draws attention to the fact that Parliament's financial management is an extremely vulnerable and high-risk area and that even non-material shortcomings may result in considerable reputational damage and may cast doubt on Parliament's overall policy achievements;deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses that critical scrutiny is necessary to ensure that Parliament's financial manageactors are held fully accountable, because only full transparency offers European citizens an insight into Parliament's financial management and its use of taxpayers' money;
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Further stresses that Parliament's discharging of itself must be seen as an expression of its acknowledgement of its particular governance structures and management procedures as well as its political will and readiness: to ensure that: - 'appearance' does not substitute critical reality checks, and - ownership of any critical area is clear, and to avoid: - intrinsic oversight failure, and - a culture in which riding the waves becomes the rule and causing the waves the exception;deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution
Heading (before paragraph 12)
The activities of its Committee on Budgetary Control...deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Invites its Committee on Budgetary Control, therefore, not only to continue but also to strengthen its critical analysis of whether Parliament's governance structures and management procedures are sufficient to ensure transparency, correct transactions, and sound financial management;deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Stresses that it is a distinctive feature of its internal organisation that Parliament's suppliers (Members) are also customers (Members) and that Parliament, as institution, has a fundamental interest in full transparency in regard to its financial management; expects its Committee on Budgetary Control, therefore, to comply fully with its specific and important parliamentary role by clearly highlighting where improvements can be done;deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Fully understands that objective, professional and comprehensive analysis of complex decision-making and management structures and procedures is more challenging and time-consuming than purely rhetorical statements and recommends that the Committee on Budgetary Control be better equipped to accomplish its increasingly demanding tasks by reinforcing substantially the establishment plan for that committee's secretariat;deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Stresses that the new wording of Article 317 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (introduced by the Lisbon Treaty) will be very challenging for Parliament's control activities and expects that the secretariat of its competent committee - the Committee on Budgetary Control - will receive additional resources so that it can continue to ensure a high-quality service for its Members;deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Stresses that the reinforcement of the committee secretariats cannot be effected on the basis of purely quantitative parameters and invites the Secretary- General to include qualitative parameters as well;deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution
Heading before paragraph 17
... are an integrated part of the institution's core businessdeleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Notes the tradition according to which the Committee on Budgetary Control requests the administration to provide information on various topics in its discharge reports; recommends that those reports be sent directly from DG Finance to the Chair of the Committee on Budgetary Control and published - for the information of the members of the Committee as well as the European citizens - on that Committee's homepage as soon as they have been received by its Chair;
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Further invites the Committee on Budgetary Control to organise a specific exchange of views with the Secretary- General on the replies given by the administration to requests contained in discharge resolutions at its ordinary committee meeting in September of each year so as to ensure proper political follow-up in a timely fashion;deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Also recommends that Authorising Officers' Annual Activity Reports be published on the Committee's homepage as soon as received by the Chair of the Committee on Budgetary Control;deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Notes that the Belgian government will reimburse EUR 85 896 389 to Parliament at the beginning of 2010; invites the Secretary-General to inform in due timebefore taking any irreversible measures the Ccommittee on Budgetary Controlpetent Committees on how that money will be used;
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 - introductory part
27. Draws attention to the fact that as interface between the public and the private sector, public procurement is a high-risk area and that Parliament must devote even morconsiderable efforts to ensure:
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Recalls that at each stage of the procurement process - initial assessment of needs, preparing the call for tender, drawing up the calls for tender and the specifications, contacts with tenderers, opening of tenders, evaluation of tenders, award decision, conclusion of contracts - there are significant risks to the achievement of the abovementioned objectives and that action needs to be taken by the authorising officers by delegation, with the assistance of Parliament's central services, to reduce exposure to risks a result of a complex legal environment and factual necessities;
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution
Heading before paragraph 29
Urgent acReform of the Financial Regulations
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Invites the Secretary- General to take urgent action in regard to the following areas: (a) Training: Recognises that progress has been made in the provision of training courses on procurement; considers the drafting of full, clear and precise technical specifications and particularly of adequate exclusion, selection and award criteria a priority; (b) Specialist function: Takes the view that procurement needs to be recognised as a 'specialist function' in Parliament's register of professional skills because full expertise is needed to deal with all the complex requirement of procurement procedures; stresses that 'full expertise' cannot be expected by staff whose main concern is their core operational tasks; recommends the creation of 'specialist procurement officers'; (c) Sensitive posts: Recommends that posts entailing significant decision- making powers in the procurement area should be considered as 'sensitive posts' and should therefore be made subject to appropriate rotation and/or to additional internal control measures; (d) External staff - Code of Conduct: Recommends - on the basis of Article 57 of the Financial Regulation - that staff from external service providers should, as a general rule, be excluded from performing tasks linked to management of the procurement process; notes that the former Secretary-General issued "Guidelines on relations with external staff" on 2 July 2008; invites the Secretary-General to clarify the status and enforceability of those 'guidelines' and to make them mandatory in all procurement procedures by having them adopted by the Bureau; (e) Procurement compliance function: Believes that adequate 'checkpoints' must be built into the procurement process at all critical stages and finds that the performance of this function could be entrusted to a 'procurement compliance function', which should be understood as a set of control activities to be carried out during the procurement process and not as an additional post; (f) Organisation of procurement: Stresses that Parliament's strategic challenge is to determine how the benefits of decentralisation can be maintained while maximising 'cross-departmental' efficiency and effectiveness in the interest of fair and open procurement; recommends a strategic shift aiming at creating a central Parliament support unit that would act as a service provider to the contracting departments; takes the firm view that there is scope for combining a degree of centralisation of expertise with the maintenance of departmental control over the subject of the tender, specifications, evaluation and awardan active part in the upcoming tri-annual revision of the Financial Regulation by giving administrative advice on areas in need of reform;
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution
Heading before paragraph 35
Article 54 of the Implementing Rules1 - "reverse that trend"
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution
Heading before paragraph 43
Article 60(4) and (7) of the Financial Regulation1deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 43
43. Notes that Article 60(4) of the Financial Regulation requires each Authorising Officer by Delegation to "put in place (...) the internal management and control procedures suited to the performance of his/her duties (...)" and that the second paragraph of Article 60(7) of the Financial Regulation requires the same actor in the financial management to report on "the efficiency and effectiveness" of the systems he/she has put in place; takes the view that the two functions are incompatible and that they should be carried out by different actors;deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 44
44. Draws attention to the fact that the Financial Regulation as adopted by the EU legislator is a political text and not a professional one, that it is drafted by the Commission and that its wording mainly reflects the interests of the Commission's Directors-General which are not necessarily the same as the interests of Parliament's Secretary-General in his capacity as the institution's Principal Authorising Officer;deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution
Heading before paragraph 45
Second opinion on management representations needdeleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45
45. Believes that Parliament could - on its own initiative - take measures to mitigate the risks inherent in the Authorising Officers' role as both 'manager' and 'controller' following Article 60(4) and (7) of the Financial Regulation and thereby strengthen (i) the protection of Parliament's political leadership and its Secretary-General and (ii) its internal accountability chain;deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46
46. Expects initiatives aiming at giving the Secretary-General the possibility to demonstrate - on the basis of further analysis - that the management representations contained in the annual activity reports and the declarations of the Directors-General present a complete and reliable picture and that any problems have been brought to his attention;deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 47
47. Takes the view that management representations and declarations in general should be considered with healthy scepticism if a second opinion on such documents is not available; invites its Committee on Budgetary Control to deal with this matter in the upcoming revision of the Financial Regulation;deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 49
49. Further notes - and strongly regrets - that only some Directors-General "indicated the risks associated with their operations or reported on the working of their internal control systems" (reply to Question 4.2.1) while the Financial Regulation in the second paragraph of Article 60(7) clearly states that Authorising Officers shall indicate in the annual activity report "the efficiency and effectiveness of the internal control system";
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution
Heading before paragraph 51
Protection of the institution's leadershipdeleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 51
51. Recalls that the objective of an internal control system is to protect the institution's political and administrative leadership from unpleasant surprises;deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 52
52. Further recalls that such protection will only be efficient if decentralisation of financial management is carried out in full recognition of the fact that central, institutional interests may be different from those of individual Authorising Officers;deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution
Heading before paragraph 53
Better checks and balancesdeleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 53
53. Stresses that in any system of financial management there must be a counterweight to those who authorise expenditure and is of the opinion that the present counterweight function only offers Parliament's political and administrative leadership a minimum degree of protection;deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution
Heading before paragraph 54
Measures to be takendeleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 54
54. Invites the Secretary-General, therefore, to inform the discharge authority as soon as possible and no later than 1 July 2010 about the precise measures - and deadline for implementation - he has taken or will take in view of reinforcing the internal control system and in particular as regards: - obtaining a second opinion at random on management representations, - reinforcing the Central Financial Unit allowing it fully to shoulder its central responsibility for the systemic adequacy of the internal control system on behalf of the Principal Authorising Officer by Delegation, - ensuring full compliance with Article 60(7) of the Financial Regulation by all Authorising Officers, - strengthening the counterweight function, - achievingby means of clearer, shorter, more precise, more relevant, more professional annual activity reports aiming at providing the discharge authority with relevant information on the institution's use of public money, - adopting any other measure necessary for the Secretary-General to issue a meaningful declaration of assurance;
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution
Heading before paragraph 55
Parliament's budget too big to be implemented on trust?deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 55
55. Recalls that Parliament's budget for 2008 amounted to EUR 1 453 million and takes the firm view that a statement of assurance on such an amount of public money must be based on solid systems;deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 57
57. Recalls that the financial resources of Parliament comprise taxpayers' money and that any institution using public funds has an obligation to explain how those funds have been used and to give comprehensive, objective and relevant information on the degree to which the funds have been used for the intended purposes and in accordance with the principles of sound financial management (economy, efficiency, effectiveness) and transparency;
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 57 a (new)
57a. Recalls that all grants are subject to the principle of transparency and equal treatment, in particular, Article 109 (1) and Article 110 (2) of the Financial Regulation and Article 169 of Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 (the implementing rules); stresses that this applies to all beneficiaries of Union funds, including Parliament staff and their relatives receiving subsidies for private excursions (skiing or other); asks the administration to follow up on the examination of such payments;
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution
Heading before paragraph 58
A missed opportunity?deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 58
58. Believes that in this context and having regard to the well-known reputational risk involved in the activities of Parliament it would have been ambitious and forward-looking to include in the abovementioned objectives new ideas and strategies aimed at strengthening Parliament's accountability towards European taxpayers;deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 59
59. Notes that the identification and achievement of world-class, risk-based, sound financial management in Parliament and full transparency towards European citizens on how Parliament uses public funds were not among the objectives for 2008 - 2009;deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 61
61. Notes thatWelcomes the creation of the post of risk manager is in the administrative work programme 2009 -on 24 February 20110 and stresses that the post should be created as soon as possible and no later than 1 May 2010 due to the size of Parliament's budget and the well-known, high reputational risk involved in the activities of Parliamentasks the newly appointed risk manager to inform the competent committees at the earliest possible convenience of the concept for a risk approach and strategy to be taken in the future;
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 67
67. Expects that its principal decision- makers in this area - the Bureau, the Secretary-General and the Director- General for Personnel - take, as soon as possible after the return of a decision, the necessary measures to ensure that Parliament's internal rules and procedures as regards missions fully and consistently comply with the principle of sound financial management and the Staff Regulations;
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 70
70. Takes the view that this budget line should not be increased before an evaluation has provided evidence that the system in fact provides for transparency, legality and sound financial management;deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 71
71. Welcomes the newly established framework as a step in the right direction; stresses that European citizens have a right to be informed about Members' use of public funds;deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 73
73. Believes that Members are to be considered as "final beneficiaries" of EU funds and that they consequently have to make the use of those funds public by means of an easily accessible database and in line with the Commission's Transparency Initiative (COM(2006)0194);deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution
Heading before paragraph 81
Practical meaning of political responsibilitydeleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 81
81. Regrets that the recommendations in its resolutions of 21 April 20041 and 26 September 20062 accompanying the discharge decisions in respect to the financial years 2002 and 2004 concerning the identification and definition of "the precise practical meaning of the political responsibility attaching to the members of Parliament's governing bodies as regards the exercise of powers and the taking of decisions with significant financial consequences" have not been fully acted upon;deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 82
82. Believes that the difference of opinion between Plenary and the Bureau is an example of the risks involved in the multilayered governance structure of Parliament;deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 83
83. Regrets the present situation which allows the Bureau - contrary to the opinion expressed by the Plenary - to take decisions with enormous financial consequences for Parliament without corresponding and adequate provision for accountability;deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution
Heading before paragraph 84
Towards adequate provision for accountabilitydeleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 84
84. Stresses that the only way to reduce this reputational risk is to providee need of full transparency concerning decisions to be taken by its governing bodies, namely, the President, the Bureau, the Quaestors and the Conference of Presidents;
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 85
85. Invites the Vice-President responsible for budgetary affairs together with the competent service to consider in which way he/she can improve the information on decisions with major budgetary consequences to the discharge authority; takes the view that oral information as given to the Committee at present is not adequate and does not satisfy European taxpayers' need for comprehensive and relevant information;
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 86
86. Takes the view that the Bureau as the body competent within Parliament for financial and administrative decisions affecting Members and the running of the institution, has a particular responsibility to foster democratic accountability and recommends, therefore, that the Vice- Presidents of its Committee on Budgetary Control be appointed permanent observer of the Bureau with a speaking right but no voting right;
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 90
90. Stresses that its former position within the organisation did not prevent the Internal Audit Service from performing its functions in accordance with professional and regulatory requirements; expects thatwelcomes its new position and expects that it will improve the flow of essential information on risk issues from the Secretary-General and thereby facilitate the Internal Auditor's role of advising the institution on dealing with risks;
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 95
95. Welcomes the improvements in the DG's' management and internal control systems but questions the high number of uncompleted actions showing an overall completion rate of only 80,53% over a relatively long time period which should have given the responsible services sufficient time to undertake corrective action;
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution
Heading before paragraph 105
Management's responsibilitiesDeleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 105
105. Stresses that the management of the groups are responsible for the preparation and presentation of the annual accounts and that this responsibility includes designing, implementing and maintaining internal control systems relevant to the preparation and presentation of annual accounts;Deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 106
106. Recalls that in accordance with Article 2.2.3 of the Rules on the use of appropriations from budget item 4 0 0 0 each group "must introduce an internal control system"; invites the management of the groups to issue a formal declaration on the effectiveness of the groups' internal control systems as well as to ask the external auditor to deliver an opinion on that declaration;Deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 107
107. Repeats its worries as regards the highly disparate nature of the internal financial rules drawn up by the various political groups (paragraph 86 of its resolution of 23 April 2009) and recommends for the sake of transparency and effective risk management that the groups' financial management be subject to the general Financial Regulation;Deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution
Heading before paragraph 114
"Maximum transparency" still to be achievDeleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 115
115. Stresses that "maximum transparency" cannot be achieved without (i) a thorough implementation of all the Internal Auditor's recommendations and in particular the introduction of a model structure for the description of programme activities and for the final activity reports and (ii) a sufficient number of ex-post on- the-spot checks of those grants by the authorising officer;
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 117
117. Expects the Bureau to take the necessary measures in order to bring itself in a position in which it is able to comply fully with the obligations given to it by Parliament's Rules of Procedure as soon as possible;Deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 128
128. Expects that the Secretary-General has set out the risks associated with the new schemes and the costs of administration and control necessary to contain those risks;deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 129
129. Is critical of the fact that several Head of Unit and Director posts have been vacant for several months; stresses that the establishment plan for a service is the expression of the will of the political authorities and the expectations of the performance of that service;deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution
Heading before paragraph 140
Independence of parliamentary committeesDeleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 140
140. Calls for initiatives enabling the Committees to decide their delegation visits on the basis of a two-year programme ;Deleted
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT
Amendment 201 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas, in accordance with the usual procedure, a questionnaire was sent to the Parliament administration and replies were received and discussed by the Committee on Budgetary Control, in the presence of the Vice-President responsible for the Budget and the Secretary-General,
2010/03/03
Committee: CONT