2 Amendments of Ingeborg GRÄSSLE related to 2010/2003(BUD)
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Recalls that wider cost implications should always be assessed in relation to new measures introduced such as, for example, when deciding on staff and assistants schemes in both 2010 and 2011; underlines especially that if additional assistants were to be recruited in Brussels, and/or Strasbourg this would have an impact on the situation regarding office space, which is already stretched; considers that the March presentation of the medium-term buildings strategy for its three places of work is crucial; suggests that the aspects reviewed should include, in particular, hand hygiene (paper towel dispensers);
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Considers that follow-up and analysis are important on a number of fronts with clear budgetary links such as, inter alia, the restructuring of Directorates-General, the pursuit of a more effective and professional staff policy, non-discrimination action, EMAS, public procurement and action taken following budget discharge recommendations; emphasises the need for continuous follow-up and analysis of Parliament's budget implementation in general; recalls, in this context, the negative media coverage that resulted from subsidies being given to relatives of Parliament staff members and calls for the Secretariat to scrutinise in advance any subsidising of event-type activities and to bring it to the attention of the committee responsible;