7 Amendments of Ingeborg GRÄSSLE related to 2012/2119(DEC)
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. The Court of Auditors considers that grubbing-up did not always target the less competitive or less viable vineyards and that the scheme financed the grubbing-up of some vineyards that had already been restructured and were in principle competitive; regretfully notes the inconsistency of that policy which is not in line with the objectives of the reform;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Fully endorses that the grubbing-up of some modernised vineyards should have been avoided by clarifying existing provisions so that vast interpretation possibilities are avoided and establishing additional eligibility criteria linked to the vineyard itself and not only to the farmer;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Is of the opinion that the Commission should review the restructuring measures to reinforce their effectiveness in order to boost the sector competitiveness; expects the Commission to ensure that the Member States' national programs are in line with the objective of the reform and the restructuring and conversion measures especially concerning SPS; asks the Commission furthermore to ameliorate the current provisions to better adjust the winenable farmers to better adapt to market signals and better match the supply to the wineproducts demanded;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Considers that the Commission should establish an regularly updated estimate of the balance between supply and demand in the wine sector based on updated data; believes that on the basis of that estimate it should determine whether anyeconometrical analysis taking into account positive output effects of restructuring and conversion measures; believes that on the basis of that estimate it should determine the targeted area for the grubbing-up measure and whether the improvement of any other measures is necessary to address possible imbalances;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Insists on the need to realise an in depth impact study assessment of the planting rights liberalisation, according to the Court of Auditors' recommendation; asks the European Commission to evaluate the potential consequences of the elimination of this regime in order to adopt the most convenient decisions to guarantee the balance of the wine market; notes with regret the opinion of a majority of Members states against the decision to end up with that system;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. urges the Commission to take measures ensuring that Member States that use flat rates per hectare to calculate payments, install proper control mechanisms for paying agencies guaranteeing that farmers are not overcompensated, standardise the estimation of costs so that variations in estimated costs for comparable measures are reduced to a minimum and establish comparability and an acceptable level of standardisation for measures based on Article 103q of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)1; _______________ 1 OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16b. urges the Commission to take adequate action to establish comparability and an acceptable level of standardisation for measures based on Article 103q of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007;