5 Amendments of Ingeborg GRÄSSLE related to 2018/2152(INI)
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Welcomes the decision of 22 Member States to proceed with the establishment of the EPPO through enhanced cooperation; calls on the Commission to incentivise the so-far reluctant Member States to join to the EPPO; calls on the Commission to make the participation in the EPPO a precondition for receiving ESI funding;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Calls for an effective cooperation between the OLAF and the EPPO to avoid double structures, conflicting competences and legal loopholes through lack of competences;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Welcomes the fact that the EU draft budget for 2019 includes, for the first time, appropriations for the EPPO (EUR 4.9 million)9 and insists on the importance of having appropriate staffing and budget for the EPPO; notes that only 37 staff posts are foreseen, which implies that after deducting the posts for 23European Persecutors, only 14 posts are foreseen for administrative tasks; considers that this is not realistic; in particular with regard to the two additional Member States that have recently decided to join the EPPO; requests therefore, a frontloading of the staff increase foreseen for 2020; _________________ 9 2019 Budgetary Procedure, draft budget estimates adopted by the Commission on 23 May 2018.
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 a (new)
Paragraph 33 a (new)
33 a. Deplores the inconsistency of the terminology in the OLAF reports; such as closed and concluded investigations; calls on the Commission and OLAF to implement a consistent terminology so that comparability over the years is guaranteed relating to the reporting and the reconditioning of fraud cases;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 b (new)
Paragraph 33 b (new)
33 b. Takes note of the ongoing issues with OLAF’s new Content Management Database (OCM); deplores in particular the fact that cases were lost in the new database; welcomes the fact that the problem is a subject of top priority; invites the Commission to provide Parliament with an in-depth evaluation of the OCM IT project, in particular regarding project design, full costs, implementation, users’ experiences, and a list of issues encountered, as per the recommendations made by the OLAF Supervisory Committee1a ; _________________ 1a OLAF Supervisory Committee Opinion No 1/2018on the OLAF preliminary draft budget for 2019