31 Amendments of Herbert REUL related to 2011/0276(COD)
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19 a (new)
Recital 19 a (new)
19a. The Commission should, at the request of the relevant Member State, be able to make an ad hoc decision on the rules and conditions applicable to this programme, in particular on the basis of the funds released due to corrections and suspensions relating to the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund;
Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
Recital 41
(41) To ensure the effectiveness, fairness and sustainable impact of the intervention of the CSF Funds, there should be provisions guaranteeing that investments in businesses and infrastructures are long- lasting and prevent the CSF Funds from being used to undue advantage. Experience has shown that a period of five10 years is an appropriate minimum period to be applied, except where State aid rules foresee a different period. It is appropriate to exclude actions supported by the ESF and those not entailing productive investment or investment in infrastructure from the general requirement of durability, unless such requirements are derived from applicable State aid rules, and to exclude contributions to or from financial instruments.
Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41 a (new)
Recital 41 a (new)
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41 b (new)
Recital 41 b (new)
(41b) In the case of direct subsidies to undertakings, it should be recognised that cohesion policy funding, rather than influencing decisions by companies, particularly bigger companies, to open a plant in a given location, tends to be pocketed by companies which have already taken such decisions (deadweight effect). Support for large private undertakings should therefore be focussed on investment in research and development or provided, in more cases, indirectly through infrastructure financing;
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41 c (new)
Recital 41 c (new)
(41c) The Structural Funds Regulation should contain an explicit regulation excluding all EU financing for relocations within the Union and reducing the threshold for reviewing investments of this kind to EUR 25 million, thereby excluding large enterprises from receiving direct subsidies and limiting the duration of operation to 10 years;
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 54
Recital 54
(54) In order to promote the Treaty objectives of economic, social and territorial cohesion, the 'Investment for growth and jobs' goal should support all regions. To provide balanced and gradual support and reflect the level of economic and social development, resources under that goal should be allocated from the ERDF and the ESF among the less developed regions, the transition regions and the more developed regions according to their gross domestic product (GDP) per capita in relation to the EU average. In order to ensure the long-term sustainability of investment from the Structural Funds, all regions which received support for the 2007–2013 period under the ‘Convergence’ goal, including regions which received support in this period, including ‘Phasing Out’ regions referred to in Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/19991, whose GDP per capita for the 2007-–2013 period was less than 75 % of the average of the EU-25 for the reference period but whose GDP per capita has grown to more than 75 % of the EU-27 average should receive at least two thirds of their 2007-–2013 allocation. Member States whose per capita gross national income (GNI) is less than 90 % of that of the Union average should benefit under the 'Investment for growth and jobs' goal from the CF. _________________ 1 OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p. 25.
Amendment 314 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 60
Recital 60
(60) In order to ensure a genuine economic impact, support from the Funds should not replace public expenditure or equivalent structural expenditure by Member States under the terms of this Regulation. In addition, so that the support from the Funds takes into account a broader economic context, the level of public expenditure should be determined with reference to the general macroeconomic conditions in which the financing takes place based on the indicators provided in the Stability and Convergence Programmes submitted annually by Member States in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1466/1997 of 7 July 1997 on the strengthening of the surveillance of budgetary positions and the surveillance and coordination of economic policies. Verification by the Commission of the principle of additionality should concentrate on the Member States in which less developed and transition regions cover at least 15% of the population because of the scale of the financial resources allocated to themsider all regions.
Amendment 341 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 87
Recital 87
(87) The frequency of project audits should be proportionate to the support provided by the EU from the Funds. The number of audits should be limited particularly in cases where the total eligible costs of the project do not exceed EUR 100 000. The Commission should have an audit obligation for projects exceeding EUR 25 million. The option of auditing a project within the framework of sample audit should always be available if there is any suggestion of irregularity, relocation or fraud, or after a project has been completed. To ensure the extent of the audits performed by the Commission is proportionate to the risk, the Commission should reduce its audit work relating to operational programmes if there are no significant deficiencies or if the audit authority is reliablehas shown itself to be reliable in previous funding periods.
Amendment 621 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 14 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
Part 2 – article 14 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) an integrated infrastructure development strategy for the regions, particularly with reference to the integrated use of the CPR Fund, the ‘Connecting Europe’ facility and the TEN Fund with particular consideration of cross-border connections and regional links to transnational transport axes;
Amendment 627 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 14 – paragraph 1 – point d – point iii a (new)
Part 2 – article 14 – paragraph 1 – point d – point iii a (new)
(iiia) measures for the efficient allocation of resources, taking competition procedures into consideration;
Amendment 735 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 21 – paragraph 7 a (new)
Part 2 – article 21 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. In the case of Member States that receive financial assistance according to Paragraph 1, Letter d, the Commission can, at the request of the relevant Member State, use an implementing measure to establish a special programme according to Article 53a of the Financial Regulation (centralised management) that allocates suspended or withdrawn payments of the relevant Member State to the objectives of Article 21(4) (greatest possible increase in the effects of the available resources on growth and competitiveness);
Amendment 739 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 22 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Part 2 – article 22 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Member States that meet one of the conditions of Paragraph 1, Letters a, b, or c can, in order to stabilise their economic position and to avoid a disastrous loss of resources, request that the Commission should use an implementing measure to establish a special programme according to Article 53a of the Financial Regulation (centralised management) which ensures that suspended or withdrawn payments of the relevant Member State enable the objectives of Article 21(4) (greatest possible increase in the effects of the available resources on growth and competitiveness) to be achieved as quickly as possible;
Amendment 915 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 38 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Part 2 – article 38 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Member States in a difficult financial situation which fulfil the criteria set out in Article 22(1) shall make use of the resources referred to in paragraph 1 and 2, where appropriate with the support of the Commission and with regard to maximising growth and competitiveness, in particular grants for economy-related infrastructure projects.
Amendment 1104 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 61 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Part 2 – article 61 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
An operation comprising investment in infrastructure or productive investment shall repay the contribution from the CSF Funds if within five10 years from the final payment to the beneficiary or within the period of time set out in the State aid rules, where applicable, it is subject to:
Amendment 1108 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 61 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Part 2 – article 61 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. When assessing projects valued in excess of EUR 25 million, the Commission should have all the necessary information to enable it to estimate whether the level of funding would lead to significant job losses at existing locations in the European Union, so as to ensure that Community funding is not used to support changes of location within the Union.
Amendment 1123 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 64 – paragraph 1
Part 2 – article 64 – paragraph 1
1. In accordance with [Article 56(3)] of the Financial Regulation, each body responsible for the management and control of expenditure under the CSF Funds shall be accredited by formal decision of an accrediting authority at ministerial level., provided that the Commission has been able to gain sufficient confidence in the administrative structures of the Member State in the last funding periods;
Amendment 1124 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 64 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Part 2 – article 64 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. If uncertainties exist in relation to the administrative capacity of a Member State, the Commission shall assume the functions of an accreditation authority;
Amendment 1193 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 82 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Part 3 – article 82 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Amendment 1194 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 82 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c
Part 3 – article 82 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) more developed regions, whose GDP per capita is above 9075 % of the average GDP of the EU-27.
Amendment 1281 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 84 – paragraph 3
Part 3 – article 84 – paragraph 3
3. At least 215 % of the Structural Funds resources for less developed regions, 40% for transition regions and 525 % for more developed regions in each Member State shall be allocated to the ESF. For the purposes of this provision, the support to a Member State through the [Food for deprived people instrument] shall be considered as part of the share of Structural Funds allocated to the ESF.
Amendment 1301 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 84 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Part 3 – article 84 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Amendment 1314 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 84 – paragraph 8
Part 3 – article 84 – paragraph 8
8. Resources for the European territorial cooperation goal shall amount to 3,487 % of the global resources available for budgetary commitment from the Funds for the period 2014 to 2020 (i.e. a total of EUR 11 700 000 004xxx).
Amendment 1332 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 86 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Part 3 – article 86 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 1364 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 87 – paragraph 2 – point c – point i
Part 3 – article 87 – paragraph 2 – point c – point i
i) the mechanisms that ensure coordination between the Funds, the EAFRD, the EMFF, the CEF and other Union and national funding instruments, and with the EIB;
Amendment 1384 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 87 – paragraph 2 – point c – point vi a (new)
Part 3 – article 87 – paragraph 2 – point c – point vi a (new)
vi a) the determination of areas in which cross-border infrastructural links and/or regional links are promoted;
Amendment 1404 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 87 – paragraph 2 – point g – point ii a (new)
Part 3 – article 87 – paragraph 2 – point g – point ii a (new)
ii a) the planned linking of Structural Fund and Cohesion Fund resources with other financial instruments, in particular the CEF;
Amendment 1408 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 87 – paragraph 2 – point h – point i a (new)
Part 3 – article 87 – paragraph 2 – point h – point i a (new)
i a) determination of the procedure for allotting funds also using competitive procedures;
Amendment 1437 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 90 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Part 3 – article 90 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Large projects in highly developed regions are eligible if they feature an infrastructural focus according to Article 9(7);
Amendment 1455 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 92 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Part 3 – article 92 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Amendment 1494 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 99 – paragraph 1
Part 3 – article 99 – paragraph 1
1. Where an urban development strategy, an infrastructural strategy, or other territorial strategy or pact as defined in Article 12(1) of Regulation…[ESF] requires an integrated approach involving investments under more than one priority axis of one or more operational programmes, the action shall be carried out as an integrated territorial investment (an ‘ITI’).
Amendment 1602 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 110 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d
Part 3 – article 110 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) 75 % for the less developed regions of Member States other than those referred to in points (b) and (c), and for all regions whose GDP per capita for the 2007-–2013 period was less than 75 % of the average of the EU-25 for the reference period but whose GDP per capita is above 75 % of the GDP average of the EU-27 and for the regions funded as so-called Phasing Out Regions under the convergence objective in the period 2007–2013;