BETA

11 Amendments of Helga TRÜPEL related to 2007/0145(COD)

Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) The programme helps attract the best students from third countries through the quality of studies on offer, the quality of the reception arrangements and a scholarship scheme that can compete with any in the word.
2008/05/29
Committee: CULT
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 11
(11) In the period 2004-2008, country- specific scholarships funded from the Commission's external cooperation instruments complemented the Erasmus Mundus scholarships in order to extend the number of beneficiary students coming from specific third countries, such as China, India, the Western Balkan countries or the ACP countries, to study in Europe. Given the positive experience with this approach, similar opportunities could be envisaged in the future in accordance with the political priorities, rules and procedures of the external co-operation instruments in question. The programme's objectives to promote European higher education as a centre of excellence in the world should be in line with a balanced geographical and social representation of the beneficiary students.
2008/05/29
Committee: CULT
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 13
(13) There is a need to widen access for those from disadvantaged groups and to address actively the special learning needs of people with disabilities in the implementation of all parts of the programmeor persons coming from a poor or minority background, including through the use of higher grants to reflect the additional costs of disabledthese participants.
2008/05/29
Committee: CULT
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Decision establishes a programme - ‘Erasmus Mundus’ (hereinafter ‘the programme’) - both for the enhancementpromotion of quality in European higher education and the promotion of intercultural understanding through cooperation with third countries as well as, and for the development of third countries in the field of higher education. The programme should be implemented in line with an equal access and with a balanced geographical representation;
2008/05/29
Committee: CULT
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) enhanced support for mobility, between the Community and third countries, of people in the field of higher education;, while respecting the principles of gender equality and a balanced geographical representation and taking into account the specific needs of people with disadvantages, especially those with disabilities, learning difficulties or with a poor or minority background.
2008/05/29
Committee: CULT
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) make sure, when determining the individual amounts for the scholarships, to take into consideration the level of tuition fees, the estimated expenditure for the studies and costs relating to the student's stay in the destination country and relating to his social background and financial background;
2008/05/29
Committee: CULT
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 13– paragraph 3 – point a
(a) an interim evaluation report on the results achieved and on the qualitative and quantitative aspects of the implementation of the programme by 31 March 20121;
2008/05/29
Committee: CULT
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a decision
Annex – Action 1 – Section A – paragraph 2 – point i
(i) shall establish transparent joint conditions for admissions which pay due regard, inter alia, to gender issues and equity issues and facilitate access for people with disabilities or disadvantaged persons, particularly those from a poor social background or minority background.
2008/05/29
Committee: CULT
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a decision
Annex – Action 1 – Section A – paragraph 2 – point j
(j) shall establishnsure that, when tuition fees are to be paid, a joint tuition fee is established regardless of the actual place of study and the country of origin of the students within the masters programme; and shall respect the right of the national states to decide the model of financing in education.
2008/05/29
Committee: CULT
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a decision
Annex – Action 1 – Section B – paragraph 2 – point i
(i) shall establish transparent joint conditions for admissions which pay due regard, inter alia, to gender issues and equity issues; and facilitate access for people with disabilities or disadvantaged persons, particularly those from a poor social background or minority background.
2008/05/29
Committee: CULT
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a decision
Annex – Action 2 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) shall establish transparent joint conditions for the award of mobility grantadmissions which pay due regard, inter alia, to gender issues and equity issues and facilitate access for people with disabilities or disadvantaged persons, particularly those from a poor social background or minority background.
2008/05/29
Committee: CULT