BETA

25 Amendments of Wolf KLINZ related to 2013/2166(INI)

Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 20 a (new)
– having regard to the Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes for Financial Institutions of Financial Stability Board published in October 2011,
2014/01/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the financial crisis has demonstrated that inefficient and fragmented supervision of financial markets contributed to financial instability and a lack of consumer protection in financial services;
2014/01/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas the structure of the ESRB and the size of its decision-making body hESRB has performed tasks of macroeconomic nature, but also got involved in ders a swift decision-making processveloping numerous micro- supervisory projects which go beyond its mandate;
2014/01/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
L. whereas supervision by the European Central Bank (ECB) of financial conglomerates active in banking and insurance business is limited by the legal basis for the SSM which could have been avoided by establishing the SSM on the basis of Article 352 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU);deleted
2014/01/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital M
M. whereas the ECB and the ESAs have different reporting standards and intervals and the creation of the SSM might poses a serious risk of duplication of reporting requirements if national authorities do not cooperate sufficiently with the SSM and ESAs;
2014/01/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital O
O. whereas the possibility of binding mediation has seldom been used and therefore should not be overestimated in the future legislation;
2014/01/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital P
P. whereas the ESAs refrain from certain necessary requests for information in anticipation of a rejection in their Boards of Supervisors;deleted
2014/01/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital R
R. whereas guidelines have proven to be a useful and necessary tool to fill gaps in regulation where no powers for the ESAs urther specify and clarify the rules and principles laid down in the according sectorial legislation. To avoid any shadow regulation which has not been subject to democratic legitimation, guidelines shall not go beyond the poweres provided for in the sectorial legislation;
2014/01/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital U
U. whereas the ESAs are limited in fulfilling their mandate by a lack of resources, and staff andlthough they have been given full flexibility in recruiting;
2014/01/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital U a (new)
Ua. whereas the recruiting process of the ESAs has not always been sufficiently transparent;
2014/01/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital V
V. whereas some requirements that the ESAs imposed on all market participants were considered to be onerous, or inappropriate and not proportional to the size and business model of the addressees;
2014/01/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital AB a (new)
ABa. whereas some decisions and guidelines of the ESAs have gone beyond the relevant Level I legislation or even have been prepared without any legal base in the sectoral legislation;
2014/01/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – paragraph 1 – indent 1
EnhanceLimit the mandate for the all ESAs for binding and non-binding mediation especially with regard to the ECB and delete Recital 32 which is misleading on the mandate for non-binding mediation;
2014/01/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – paragraph 1 – indent 2
– Give the ESAs the possibility to trigger binding and non-binding mediation on their own initiative;deleted
2014/01/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – paragraph 1 – indent 4
Ensure that the ESAs, national supervisory authorities and the ECBAsk the Commission to conduct an impact assessment whether the ESAs shall have access to the same supervisory information which has to be provideas national supervisory authorities and wthere possible in a common format which ECB, which in any case would hasve to be determined by the ESAsprovided in a common electronic format;
2014/01/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – paragraph 1 – indent 5
Establish the ESRB outside the ECBAsk the Commission to assess the mandate and tasks of the ESRB in order to avoid the arising conflicts of interest between micro-prudential supervision and supervisory tools and macro-economic oversight.
2014/01/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – paragraph 2 – indent 1
– proposing a single seat for all three ESA;deleted
2014/01/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – paragraph 2 – indent 4
– granting the ESAs an independent budget line as for the European Data Protection Supervisor funded budget line funded solely by the contributions from market participants and the Union budget;
2014/01/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – paragraph 2 – indent 5
– taking account of the size of Member States and their respective financial sector when reviewing the voting rights on the boards of supervisors and introducing simplequalified majority voting for all decisions within the ESAs;
2014/01/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 212 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – paragraph 2 – indent 6
– clarifying that guidelines to improve common standards for the whole internal market pursuant to Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010, and of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 can be issued without additionalonly based on the respective empowerment in sectorial legislation and deleting Recital 26 of those Regulations, which can secure democratic legitimacy;
2014/01/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 213 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – paragraph 2 – indent 6 a (new)
– further clarify that guidelines can only be issued where public consultation has been conducted and therefore, delete “where appropriate” in Article 16 (2) in each of the Regulations;
2014/01/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 235 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – paragraph 2 – indent 9
– enabling the ESRB to explore and to propose additional measures for macroeconomic stability such as leverage and loan-to-value ratios, counter cyclical buffers and accounting standards promoting financial stability;deleted
2014/01/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 249 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – paragraph 2 – indent 10
– requiring the ESAs to respect where appropriate the principal of proportionality especially with regard to small and medium-sized market participants when carrying out their tasks and developing their supervisory methods, practices and handbooks;
2014/01/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 276 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – paragraph 2 – indent 15
– requiring the ESAs to have a possibility for citizens of all Member States in place to contact the ESAs to ask questions, obtain answers and file complaints;deleted
2014/01/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 280 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – paragraph 2 – indent 17
– providing for the mandatoryappropriate involvement of the ESAs and of the ESRB in legislative processes concerning their fields of expertise;
2014/01/15
Committee: ECON