[ParlTrack]

The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal.

2009/03/10
Committee: TRAN

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c

c) it shall be justified on the basis of a socio-economic analysis. This shall include the impact on th~~ose par~~e elements of the transport system ~~where the allocation of infrastructure capacity in the freight corridor significantly affects freight and passenger traffic~~, freight and passenger traffic (particularly regular services), the impact on public transport, and regional conditions. It shall also include an analysis of the major effects in terms of external costs;

2009/03/10
Committee: TRAN

Jörg LEICHTFRIED

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5

5. A working group made up of managers and owners of the strategic terminals of the freight corridor, referred to in Article 9, all other relevant stakeholders, and employees, shall be set up. It may issue an opinion on any proposal by the governance body which has direct consequences for investment and the management of strategic terminals. The governance body may not take any decision contrary to that opinion.

2009/03/10
Committee: TRAN

Jörg LEICHTFRIED

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – Title

Consulting applicants Consulting railway undertakings

2009/03/10
Committee: TRAN

Jörg LEICHTFRIED

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1

1. The governance body shall introduce consultation mechanisms with a view to the proper participation of the ~~applicant~~railway undertakings likely to use the freight corridor, as defined in Article 2 of Directive 2001/14/EC.

2009/03/10
Committee: TRAN

Jörg LEICHTFRIED

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1

1. Notwithstanding Article 20(2) of Directive 2001/14/EC, the infrastructure managers of the freight corridor shall reserve the capacity needed for priority freight traffic for the coming financial year, prior to the annual exercise to define the working timetable referred to in Article 18 of Directive 2001/14/EC and using as a basis the freight traffic observed and the market study defined in Article 5(1).deleted

2009/03/10
Committee: TRAN

Jörg LEICHTFRIED

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2

2. The infrastructure managers shall keep a reserve of capacity within the final working timetable to allow them to respond quickly and appropriately to ad hoc requests for capacity as referred to in Article 23 of Directive 2001/14/EC. This capacity must be sufficient to allow requests for train paths to be met while guaranteeing a sufficient level of quality for the allocated train path in terms of journey times on the train path and timetables adapted to freight traffic.deleted

2009/03/10
Committee: TRAN

Jörg LEICHTFRIED

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 4 a (new)

4a. Infrastructure managers shall include in their conditions of use a fee for paths that are allocated but ultimately not used. The level of this fee shall be appropriate, deterrent and effective.

2009/03/10
Committee: TRAN

Jörg LEICHTFRIED

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13

Notwithstanding Article 16(1) of Directive 2001/14/EC, applicants other than railway undertakings and the international groupings that they make up, may request train paths for freight transport where the latter concern one or more sections of the freight corridor.Article 13 deleted Authorised applicants

2009/03/10
Committee: TRAN

Jörg LEICHTFRIED

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2

2. The rules of priority referred to in paragraph 1 above must at least provide that the train path allocated to a priority freight train complying with the initial provisions for its train path may neither be reallocated to another train, nor modified, except where the initial holder of the train path agrees to reallocation to another train or modification of the train path.deleted

2009/03/10
Committee: TRAN

10 Amendments of Jörg LEICHTFRIED related to 2008/0247(COD)

ParlTrack - 2011-2024