15 Amendments of Sophia IN 'T VELD related to 2013/0165(COD)
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) The Union eCall system is expected tomight reduce the number of fatalities in the Union as well as the severity of injuries caused by road accidents. The mandatory introduction of the eCall system wcould make the service available to all citizens and thus contribute to reduce human suffering and healthcare and other costswho decide to use it.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) The mandatory equipping of vehicles with the eCall in-vehicle system should be without prejudice to the right of all stakeholders such as car manufacturers and independent operators to offer additional emergency and/or added value services, in parallel with or building on the 112-based eCall in- vehicle system. However, these additional services should be designed not to increase driver distraction.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) The eCall system, the private eCall system and the added value eCall system should be optional. In case the device is installed in the vehicle and is in use, it shall comply with the rules set in this Regulation. Small series vehicles are excluded under Directive 2007/46/EC from the requirements on the protection of occupants in the case of frontal impact and side impact. Therefore, those small series vehicles should be excluded from the obligation to comply with the eCall requirements.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
This Regulation establishes the technical requirements for the EC type-approval of vehicles regarding the optional eCall in- vehicle system.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Manufacturers shall demonstrate that all new types of vehicles referred to in Article 2 are equipped with an eCall in-vehicle system, in accords are in compliance with this Regulation and the delegated acts adopted pursuant to ithis Regulation.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
In accordance with Directive 95/46/EC and Directive 2002/58/EC, manufacturers shall ensure that vehicles equipped with eCall in- vehicle system are not traceable and are not subject to any constant tracking in their normal operational status related to the eCall112-based- e-Call, private eCall or added value services based on the system.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. TWhen processing data, eCall service providers and third party service providers shall comply with the data minimisation principle meaning that only the data necessary to achieve the purpose pursued should be collected. Consequently, the "minimum set of data" sent by the eCall in-vehicle system shall include only the minimum information required for the appropriate handling of emergency callstime of incident, the precise location including direction of driving, the vehicle identification, the eCall identifier giving the severity of the incident (manual or automatically triggered), information about a possible service provider.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Manufacturers and third party controllers, as well as resellers, shall ensure that eCall users are provided with prior, clear and comprehensive information about the processing of data carried out throughfor 112 services, private services or added value services based on the eCall in- vehicle system, in particular about:
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point f
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point f
(f) the time limit for the retention of data in the in-vehicle system, i.e. the period for which the data will be stored in the in- vehicle system, or if this is not possible, the criteria used to determine this period; in any event, personal data shall not be processed for longer than necessary for the purpose for which they have been processed;
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. eCall users shall be requested to give prior, informed, specific, explicit, free consent to private eCall services and added value services. No adverse consequences may be drawn from a refusal to consent to the use of private eCall or added value services. Consent may be withdrawn at any moment free of charge and the controller shall provide for means to do so easily, without any adverse consequence, including an easy to use mechanism to delete any personal data stored on the device.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 b (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. To prevent confusion in relation to the purposes pursued and the added value of the processing, information referred to in paragraph 3 shall be provided to the user of the 112 eCall service, private eCall service and/or other value added services, prior to the use of the system. This information shall be provided in distinct contracts for each of the services provided. In particular, the contract shall specify that all services are optional.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 c (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. The acting controller for this system may process personal data within its systems only if the eCall user, the data subject, has given his or her prior consent. Privacy enhancing technologies shall be embedded in all three eCall systems in order to provide eCall users, including the private and added value services, with the desired level of privacy protection, as well as the necessary safeguards to prevent surveillance and misuse. The 112 eCall, private eCall and added value services shall be by default switched off, only to be switched on manually.
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 9 which shall define further the requirement of the absence of traceability and tracking and the privacy enhancing technologies referred to in paragraph 1 as well as the modalities of the private data processing and of the user information referred to in paragraph 3.
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4
Article 9 – paragraph 4
4. As soon as itThe Commission shall be empowered to adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliaments in accordance with Article 9 which shall define further the privacy enhancing technologies referred to in paragraph 1 as well as the modalities of the private data processing and tof the Counciluser information referred to in paragraph 3.