9 Amendments of Sophia IN 'T VELD related to 2014/2228(INI)
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. having regard to the fact that data protection legislation differs in the EU and the US, and that European citizens are concerned about the possibility that the TTIP agreement will undermine the fundamental right to privacy;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion
Recital B b (new)
Recital B b (new)
Bb. having regard to its resolution of 14 May 2013 on EU trade and investment negotiations with the United States of America, paragraph 13 in particular;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Recital B c (new)
Recital B c (new)
Bc. having regard to the Council Directives for the negotiation on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership between the European Union and the United States of America;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. ensure that the agreement guarantees full respect for EU fundamental rights standards;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. ensure that the agreement takes account of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) provisions on the protection of personal data;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 c (new)
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. insist that the Agreement will not preclude the enforcement of exceptions on the supply of services justifiable under the relevant WTO rules (Articles XIV and XIVbis GATS);
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. oppose the US TiSA Agreement proposal, a text which would completely undermine all EU rules and safeguards for the transfer of personal data to third countries;
Amendment 71 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Recalls that decisions on legal conflicts about fundamental rights may only be made by competent ordinary courts; is concerned thatrecalls that possible provisions on investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) may not prevent access to justice and undermine democracy;
Amendment 85 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Recalls the need for transparency in the negotiations throughout the entire process; reminds the Commission of itsmaintain the obligation to keep Parliament fully informed on an immediate basis at all stages of the negotiations; iensists onure access for the public to relevant negotiation documents from all parties, with the exception of those which are to be classified with clear justification on a case-by-case basion a case-by-case basis with a public justification of the extent to which access to the undisclosed parts of the document in question is likely to specifically and actually undermine the interests protected by the exceptions, in line with Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents2 , and in line with jurisprudence of the Court of Justice. __________________ 2 OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 43.