BETA

Activities of Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO related to 2012/0179(COD)

Plenary speeches (1)

North-East Atlantic: deep-sea stocks and fishing in international waters - Status of the North-East Atlantic mackerel fishery (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/0179(COD)

Amendments (55)

Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) The Union is committed to implement the Resolutions adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations, in particular Resolutions 61/105 and 64/72, which call on States and Regional Fisheries Management Organisations to ensure the protection of vulnerable deep-sea marine ecosystems from the destructive impact of bottom fishing gears, as well as the sustainable exploitation of deep-sea fish stocks.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) The development and adoption of the measures recommended by NEAFC to protect deep water vulnerable marine ecosystems against the adverse effects of bottom fishing gear, in accordance with resolutions 61/105 and 64/72, have been widely supported by the Union, and have been recognised by the General assembly of the United Nations as a very significant step towards achieving the goal of protecting vulnerable marine ecosystems and their biodiversity.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) Sedimentary and sandy seabed areas are not vulnerable marine ecosystems as defined in Regulation (EC) No 734/2008 on the protection of vulnerable marine ecosystems in the high seas from the adverse impacts of bottom fishing gears.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 b (new)
(2b) These measures are proportionate and establish an efficient management framework based on additional measures: the freezing of existing fishing activities' footprint, the requirement to conduct impact and risk studies prior to the practice of fishing activities in new areas, and the respect of vulnerable marine ecosystems avoidance protocol when ships find indices of their presence. These measures should be formally incorporated into Union law in its entirety, when the transposition has not yet been achieved, despite the fact that the first of these measures have been adopted by NEAFC in 2008.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 c (new)
(2c) FAO guidelines on the management of deep-sea fisheries in the High Seas adopted in 2008, that the Union committed to respect and which define the concrete implementation of resolution 61/105 of the United Nations General Assembly, invite coastal States to apply the principles and methods they contain in their national courts. Given the example provided by the relevance of the measures recommended to the flag States by the NEAFC for waters beyond national jurisdiction, there is no reason for the coastal States in the NEAFC regulated area not to apply these measures in their own waters. It is therefore appropriate to provide that the measures recommended by NEAFC to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems in deep water against the adverse effects of bottom fishing gears shall apply 'mutatis mutandis' in EU waters, instead of any other modality.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) In order to maintain necessary reductions in fishing capacity achieved so far in deep-sea fisheries, and to focus management measures on the most relevant part of the fleet for deep sea fisheries, it is appropriate to provide that fishing for deep-sea species is subject to a fishing authorisation which limits the capacity of vessels eligible to land deep-sea species. With a viewfish deep-sea species in a targeted manner. It is however necessary that fishing licenses are also delivered for bycatch fishing of deep-sea species, considering that all these fishing activities are likely to focus management measures on the part of the fleet most relevant for deep-sea fisheries, the fishing authorisations should be issued according to target or by- catch fisherycur in areas where deep water vulnerable marine ecosystems may be present, and that they should be protected against the adverse effects that may have these activities, including those using bottom gears. However, the Council and Parliament Regulation (EU) No xxx/2013 from xxx 2013 on the common fisheries policy defines a goal of eliminating discards that also apply to deep-sea species. The novelty of this new requirement should be taken into account so that vessels incidentally capturing deep-sea species and which are not currently subjected to a licensing regime for fishing, are not totally deprived of the opportunity to continue their traditional fishing activities.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6 a (new)
(6a) The forthcoming entry into force of the rules on the compulsory landing of discards will lead to greater demand for permits for deep-sea fishing.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) Deep-sea fishing with bottom trawls carry the highest risk for vulnerable marine ecosystems among the different gears used and reports the highest rates of undesired catch of deep-sea species. Bottom trawls should therefore be permanently prohibited from the targeting of deep-sea species.deleted
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) Deep-sea fishing with bottom trawls carry the highest risk for vulnerable marine ecosystems among the different gears used and reports the highest rates of undesired catch of deep-sea species. Bottom trawls should therefore be permanently prohibited from the targeting of deep-sea speciesonly be used if guarantees can be provided as to the sustainability of fishing, in accordance with the provisions of this Regulation.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) Bottom-set gillnets are currently restricted in entering deep-sea fisheries by Council Regulation (EC) No 1288/2009 establishing transitional technical measures from 1 January 2010 to 30 June 2011. In view of the high rates of undesired catch when they were deployed unsustainably in deep waters, and in view of the ecological impact of lost and abandoned gear, this gear should also be permanently prohibited from the targeting of deep-sea species.deleted
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) Bottom-set gillnets are currently restricted in entering deep-sea fisheries by Council Regulation (EC) No 1288/2009 establishing transitional technical measures from 1 January 2010 to 30 June 2011. In view of the high rates of undesired catch when they were deployed unsustainably in deep waters, and in view of the ecological impact of lost and abandoned gear, this gear should also be permanently prohibited from the targeting of deep-sea speciesonly be used if guarantees can be provided as to the sustainability of fishing, in accordance with the provisions of this Regulation.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) Moreover, vessels which haveo wish to change gear in order to be able to stay in the fishery should be eligible for receiving financial assistance from the European Fisheries Fund provided that the new gear reduces the impact of fishing on non- commercial species and provided also that the national operational programme allows contributing to such measures.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) Moreover, vessels which have to change gear in order to be able to stay in the fishery in a sustainable manner should be eligible for receiving financial assistance from the European Fisheries Fund provided that the new gear reduces the impact of fishing on non- commercial species and provided also that the national operational programme allows contributing to such measures.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) Vessels targeting deep-sea species with otherusing bottom gear should not extend their range of operation according to their authorisation within Union waters, unless expansion can be assessed as not carrying a significant risk of negative impact on vulnerable marine ecosystems.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) Vessels targetfishing deep-sea species with otherin a targeted or accessory manner with bottom gear should not extend their range of operation according to their fishing authorisation within Union waters, unless expansion can be assessed as not carrying a significant risk of negative impact on vulnerable marine ecosystems. Similarly, wherever their area of activity may be, when finding indices of the presence of vulnerable marine ecosystems, they should avoid these locations in the future, pending whether these indices reflect a proved presence of vulnerable marine ecosystems.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) The concept of technodiversity needs to be defined. Account must be taken of the fact that each type of gear has its own specific characteristics in terms its of capacity to capture a given species and its impact on the seabed. It should therefore be recognised that certain types of gear are better than others at catching a given species, depending on where the species is caught and whether it is endangered.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) Scientific advice concerning certain fish stocks found in the deep-sea indicates that these stocks are particularly vulnerable to exploitation, and that fishing for these stocks should be limited or reduced as a precautionary measure. Fishing opportunities for deep-sea stocks should not go beyond those levels which are scientifically advised as precautionary. In the case of advice being absent for lack of sufficient information about stocks or species, no fishing opportunities shouldmay only be allocated in accordance with the precautionary principle, based on the best available information.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) Scientific advice concerning certain fish stocks found in the deep-sea indicates that these stocks are particularly vulnerable to exploitation, and that fishing for these stocks should be limited or reduced as a precautionary measurehowever there have been quantified improvements in some stocks such as the roundnose grenadier, blue ling and black scabbardfish. Fishing opportunities for deep-sea stocks should not go beyond those levels which are scientifically advised as precautionary. In the case of advice being absent for lack of sufficient information about stocks or species, no fishing opportunities should be allocated.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) Regulation (EU) No xxx/2013 from the Council and the European Parliament from xxx 2013 on the common fisheries policy defines the rules which should govern the determination of opportunities in respect of the precautionary principle and aiming at quickly achieving maximum sustainable yield. There is no need to consider different ways from those defined as general, especially in spite of their particularly vulnerability to exploitation, several stocks of deep-water species with a major commercial interest are already recognised by ICES as being operated in accordance with the principle of maximum sustainable yield. The Commission may propose a framework for deep-sea species by-catch through a system of TACs and quotas, if it considers it necessary for their preservation.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) ‘deep-sea species’ means the species listed in Annex I and Ia (new);
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) ‘most vulnerable species’ means the deep-sea species indicated in the third column ‘Most vulnerable (x)’ of the table in Annex Ia (new);
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
(ea) ‘vulnerable marine ecosystem’ means any marine ecosystem whose integrity (i.e. ecosystem structure or function) is, according to the best scientific information available and to the principle of precaution, threatened by significant adverse impacts resulting from physical contact with bottom gears in the normal course of fishing operations, including inter alia reefs, seamounts, hydrothermal vents, cold water corals or cold water sponge beds. The most vulnerable ecosystems are those that are easily disturbed and in addition are very slow to recover, or may never recover.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. 'existing fishing areas' means fishing areas where fishing operations have been conducted since the entry into force of Council Regulation 2347/2002 of 16 December 2002 establishing specific access requirements and associated conditions applicable to fishing for deep- sea stocks;
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. 'new fishing areas' means fishing areas where no previous deep-water fishing operations have been documented
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. 'exploratory fishing' means fishing operations conducted in new fishing areas;
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 d (new)
2d. 'fishing vessel' means a Union vessel operating in the waters defined in Article 2 or a third country vessel operating in Union waters;
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the vessel's master records in the logbook a percentage of deep-seathe species defined in Annex I which is equal or superior to 1025% of the overall catch weight in the fishing daytrip concerned.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the vessel's master records in the logbook a percentage of deep-sea species equal or superior to 105% of the overall catch weight in the fishing day concerned or 10% of the annual total.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. Fishing activities carried out in Union waters not targeting deep-sea species but catching deep-sea species as a by-catch, carried out by a Union fishing vessel, shall be subject to a fishing authorisation, which shall indicate deep-sea species as by-catch.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5
5. Notwithstanding paragraphs 1 and 3, fishing vessels may catch, retain on board, tranship or land any quantity of deep-sea species without a fishing authorisation, if that quantity is below a threshold set at 100 kg of any mixture of deep-sea species per fishing trip.deleted
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
The aggregate fishing capacity measured in gross tonnage and in kilowatt of all fishing vessels holding a fishing authorisation issued by a Member State, allowing the targeted catch of deep-sea species, whether as target or by-catch species, as defined in Article 4 (2) shall at no time exceed the aggregate fishing capacity of vessels of that Member State which have landed 10 tonnes or more of deep-sea species during any of the two calendar years preceding the entry into force of this Regulation2009-2011, whichever year provides the higher figure.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Each application for a fishing authorisation allowing for the catch of deep-sea species whether as target or by- catch specithin areas of existing fishing activities, and for its renewal shall be accompanied by a description of the area where it is intended to conduct fishing activities, the type of gears, the depth range at which the activities will be deployed, and of the individual species targetedrelevant species.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 a (new)
Article 6a Procedure for identification of areas of existing fishing activities The Commission shall identify areas of existing fishing activities in line with the provisions of Article 3 of the NEAFC recommendations on regulating bottom fishing, as quoted in Annex 2 a (new) of this Regulation.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. In addition to the requirements set out in Article 6, each application for a fishingn authorisation for targeted deep sea fisheries, as referred to in Article 4(1),fishing deep-water stocks that allows for the use of bottom gears in Union waters as rdeferred toined in Article 2(a), shall be accompanied by a detailed fishing plan specifyingor in waters under NEAFC jurisdiction as referred to in Article 2(c), shall:
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. In addition to the requirements set out in Article 6, each application for a fishing authorisation for targeted deep sea fisheries, as referred to in Article 4(1), that allows the use of bottom gears in Union waters as referred to in Article 2(a), shall be accompanied by a detailed fishing plan specifying, in addition to the fishing gears and technical measures to be used:
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the locations of the intended activities targeting deep-sea species in the deep-sea métier. The location(s) shall be defined by coordinates in accordance with the World Geodetic System of 1984list the bottom-sea gear that will be used;
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the locations, if any, of activities in the deep-sea métier during the last three full calendar years. Those location(s) shall be defined by coordinates limit the authorised fishing accordance with the World Geodetic System of 1984 and they shall circumscribe the fishing activities as closely as possible.tivities to existing fishing areas;
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) provide for the respect of measures currently applying in the NEAFC framework;
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Any fishing authorisation issued on the basis of an application made in accordance with paragraph 1 shall specify the bottom gear to be used and limit the fishing activities authorised to the area in which the intended fishing activity, as set out in paragraph 1(a), and the existing fishing activity, as set out in paragraph 1(b), overlap. However, the area of the intended fishing activity can be extended beyond the area of the existing fishing activity if the Member State has assessed and documented, based on scientific advice, that such extension would not have significant adverse impaWithout prejudice to Article 7 (1), fishing activities that are to take place in waters defined in paragraph 1 but that are defined as new fishing areas in the meaning of Article 3 paragraph 2b(new) shall be subject to a fishing authorisation. Applications for such authorisations shall include a detailed project for the exploratory fishing activity that follows the NEAFC guidelines outlined in Annex IIa(new). Applications will be accepted if it can be shown that the activity described will have no harmful effects on vulnerable marine ecosystems.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point 1 (new)
(1) Applications for fishing authorisations in waters defined at Article 2 point b) shall fulfil the conditions set out in Regulation (EC) No 734/2008 of 15th July 2008 on the protection of vulnerable marine ecosystems in the high seas from the adverse impacts of bottom fishing gears.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point 2 (new)
(2) Existing fishing areas, as defined under article 3 and provisions for identification, as set out in article 6a(new), correspond to: (a) in Union waters: fishing areas for which there is evidence of fishing activity in the period since the entry into force of Council Regulation 2347/2002 of 16th December 2002 establishing specific access requirements and associated conditions applicable to fishing for deep sea stocks. (b) in Union waters under NEAFC jurisdiction: existing fishing zones that are defined and established in the NEAFC framework, as mentioned in Annex IIb(new).
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point 3 (new)
(3) Authorisations referred to in Article 4 shall require the notification of capture of species listed in Annex Ia (new), whether retained or discarded.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point 4 (new)
(4) In addition to the requirements in paragraph 5, by-catch authorisations, as defined in Article 4 (3) shall require the reporting of all species in Annex I, whether retained or discarded.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point 5 (new)
(5) Fishing activities conducted in the framework of fishing authorisations referred to in Article 4 may be subject to the introduction of quantitative limits on the total amount of catches of the species included in Annex Ia (new) if such a limit is necessary
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9
Expiry of fishing authorisations targeting deep-sea species for vessels using bottom trawls or bottom-set gillnets Fishing authorisations referred to in Article 4(1) for vessels using bottom trawls or bottom-set gillnets shall expire at the latest two years after the entry into force of this Regulation. After that date, fishing authorisations targeting deep-sea species with those gears shall neither be issued nor renewed.Article 9 deleted
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9
Expiry of fishing authorisations targeting deep-sea species for vessels using bottom trawls or bottom-set gillnets Fishing authorisations referred to in Article 4(1) for vessels using bottom trawls or bottom- set gillnets shall expire at the latest two years after the entry into force of this Regulation. After that date, fishing authorisations targeting deep-sea species with those gears shall neither be issued nor renewed1. Within two years of the entry into force of this Regulation, a decision shall be taken, on the basis of the results of the scientific evaluation of deep-sea resources, that will ensure a rate of exploitation in line with the maximum sustainable yield of stocks. the scientific evaluation shall take account of, in particular, the data obtained in the collection schemes covering fishing activities, for which authorisations are delivered, referred to in Article 8. 2. If the results of the scientific evaluation show that the stocks are being exploited at levels equivalent to the maximum sustainable yield, the fishing opportunities for the following year will be set according to these levels of exploitation. Technical measures will then be established with a view to minimising undesired catches of both vulnerable species and insufficiently large fish, and to mitigating any collateral damage to vulnerable ecosystems caused by fishing. 3. If the results of the scientific evaluation show that the stocks are being exploited at levels above the maximum sustainable yield, a recovery plan will be drawn up without delay, laying down rules under which fishing opportunities will be set in such a way as to return stocks to a level commensurate with maximum sustainable yield levels within a reasonable period of time. The recovery plan will be supplemented by technical measures to eliminate undesired catches of both vulnerable species and insufficiently large fish, and any collateral damage to vulnerable ecosystems caused by fishing.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) where the best scientific information available does not identify exploitation rates corresponding to the precautionary approach to fisheries management due to lack of sufficient data concerning a certain stock or species, nothe fishing opportunities may be allocated for the fisheries concernedfor the relevant fishing management period may not be fixed higher than the rates provided within the ICES approach for data limited stocks.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. The Council, acting in accordance with the Treaty, may decide to switching from the fixing of annual fishing opportunities for deep-sea species in terms of both fishing effort limits and catch limits to the fixing of only fishing effort limits for specific fisheries shall be decided in accordance with the Treaty.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 313 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2
2. The power to adopt delegated acts as referred to in Article 13 shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminateperiod of three years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation. The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power no later than nine months before the end of the three year period. The delegation of power shall be tacitly extended for periods of timean identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council oppose such extension no later than three months before the end of each period.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 318 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1
Special fishing authorisations issued in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 2347/2002 shall remain valid until their replacement by fishing authorisations allowing the catch of deep-sea species issued in accordance with this Regulation, but shall in any case no longer be valid after 30 September 20124.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 320 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I
Annex I Section 1: Deep-sea species Scientific name Common name Most vulnerable (x) Commercial species Most vulnerable (x) Centrophorus granulosus Gulper shark x Centrophorus squamosus Leafscale gulper shark x Centroscyllium fabricii Black dogfish x Centroscymnus coelolepis Portuguese dogfish x Centroscymnus crepidater Longnose velvet dogfish x Dalatias licha Kitefin shark x Etmopterus princeps Greater lanternshark x Apristuris spp Iceland catchark Chlamydoselachus anguineus Frilled shark Deania calcea Birdbeak dogfish Galeus melastomus Blackmouth dogfish Galeus murinus Mouse catshark Hexanchus griseus Bluntnose six-gilled shark x Etmopterus spinax shark Velvet belly Oxynotus paradoxus Sailfin roughsharkVelvet belly Scymnodon ringens Sailfin roughshark Somniosus microcephalus (Sharpback shark) Scymnodon ringens Knifetooth dogfish Somniosus microcephalus Greenland shark Alepocephalidae Smoothheads (Slickheads) Alepocephalus Bairdii Baird's smoothhead Alepocephalus rostratus(Slickheads) Alepocephalus rostratus Baird's smoothhead Risso's smoothhead Aphanopus carbo Black scabbardfish x Argentina silus Greater silver smelt x Beryx spp. Alfonsinos x Chaceon (Geryon) affinis Deep-water red crab Chimaera monstrosa Rabbit fish (rattail) Hydrolagus mirabilis Large-eyed rabbitfish (Ratfish) Rhinochimaera atlantica (Ratfish) Straightnose rabbitfish Coryphaenoides rupestris Roundnose grenadier Epigonus telescopus Black cardinalfish x x Helicolenus dactilopterus Bluemouth (Bluemouth redfish) Hoplostethus atlanticus Orange roughy x Macrourus berglax Roughhead grenadier (Rough rattail) Molva dypterigia Blue ling x Mora moro Common mora Antimora rostrata Blue antimora (Blue hake) Pagellus bogaraveo Red (blackspot) seabream Phycis blennoides Greater Forkbeard x Polyprion americanus Wreckfish Reinhardtius hippoglossoides Greenland halibut x Cataetyx laticeps Hoplosthetus mediterraneus Silver roughy (Pink) Macrouridae Grenadiers (rattails) other than Coryphaenoides rupestris other than roundnose grenadier and and Macrourus berglax rupestris and Macrourus grenadier and berglax roughhead grenadier Nesiarchus nasutus Black gemfish Notocanthus chemnitzii Snubnosed spiny eel Raja fyllae Round skate Raja hyperborea Arctic skate Raja nidarosiensus Norwegian skate Trachyscorpia cristulata Spiny (deep-sea) scorpionfish Section 2: Species regulated in NEAFC in addition Brosme brosme Tusk Conger conger Conger eel Lepidopus caudatus Silver scabbard fish (Cutless fish) Lycodes esmarkii Greater Eelpout Molva molva Ling Tusk x Sebastes viviparus Small redfish (Norway haddock) x
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 321 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I
Annex I Section 1: Deep-sea speciesAnnex I Scientific name Common name Most vulnerable (x) Centrophorus granulosus Gulper shark x Centrophorus squamosus Leafscale gulper shark x Centroscyllium fabricii Black dogfish x Centroscymnus coelolepis Portuguese dogfish x Centroscymnus crepidater Longnose velvet dogfish x Dalatias licha Kitefin shark x Etmopterus princeps Greater lanternshark x Apristuris spp Iceland catchark Chlamydoselachus anguineus Frilled shark Deania calcea Birdbeak dogfish Galeus melastomus Blackmouth dogfish Galeus murinus Mouse catshark Hexanchus griseus Bluntnose six-gilled shark x Etmopterus spinax Velvet belly Oxynotus paradoxus Sailfin roughshark (Sharpback Scymnodon ringens shark) Somniosus microcephalus Knifetooth dogfish Greenland shark Alepocephalidae Smoothheads (Slickheads) Alepocephalus Bairdii Baird's smoothhead Alepocephalus rostratus Risso's smoothhead Aphanopus carbo Black scabbardfish Argentina silusAphanopus carbo Black scabbardfish Argentina silus Greater silver smelt Beryx spp. Alfonsinos Chaceon (Geryon) affinis Deep-water red crab Chimaera monstrosa Rabbit fish (rattail) Hydrolagus mirabilis Large-eyed rabbitfish (Ratfish) Rhinochimaera atlantica Straightnose rabbitfish Coryphaenoides rupestris Roundnose grenadier Epigonus telescopus Black cardinalfish x Helicolenus dactilopterus Bluemouth (Bluemouth redfish) Hoplostethus atlanticus Orange roughy x Macrourus berglax Roughhead grenadier (Rough rattail) Alfonsinos Coryphaenoides rupestris Roundnose grenadier Molva dypterigia Blue ling Mora moro Common mora Antimora rostrata Blue antimora (Blue hake) Pagellus bogaraveo Red (blackspot) seabream Phycis blennoides Greater Forkbeard Polyprion americanus Wreckfish Reinhardtius hippoglossoides Greenland halibut Cataetyx laticeps Hoplosthetus mediterraneus Silver roughy (Pink) Macrouridae Grenadiers (rattails) other than Coryphaenoides rupestris other than roundnose grenadier and and Macrourus berglax roughhead grenadier Nesiarchus nasutus Black gemfish Notocanthus chemnitzii Snubnosed spiny eel Raja fyllae Round skate Raja hyperborea Arctic skate Raja nidarosiensus Norwegian skate Trachyscorpia cristulata Spiny (deep-sea) scorpionfish Section 2: Species regulated in NEAFC in addition Brosme brosme Tusk Conger conger Conger eel Lepidopus caudatus Silver scabbard fish (Cutless fish) Lycodes esmarkii Greater Eelpout Molva molva Ling Species that are subject to regulation under NEAFC jurisdiction Brosme brosme Tusk Sebastes viviparus Small redfish (Norway haddock)
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 343 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 2 – point 3
3. Discards shall be sampled in all deep-sea métiers. The sampling strategy for landings and discards shall cover all the species listed in Annex I and Ia as well as species belonging to the seabed ecosystem such as deep-water corals, sponges or other organisms belonging to the same ecosystem.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 344 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II a (new)
Annex IIa Identification of existing bottom fishing areas 1. The mapping of existing fishing areas within European Union waters shall be given priority. 2. A preliminary map based on VMS data and other geo reference data presently available with the European Commission and the Member States shall be developed. 3. Member States having vessels involved in bottom fishing activities in the period 2003 to 2013 shall, for the purpose of paragraph 1, submit comprehensive maps of existing fishing areas to the European Commission according to the guidelines set out in annex 3 of the NEAFC recommendation on regulating bottom fishing. 4. The comprehensive map of existing bottom fishing areas referred to in paragraphs 1 and 3 shall be revised regularly to incorporate any relevant information.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 345 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II b (new)
Annex IIb Bottom fishing activities in new bottom fishing areas 1. Upon entry into force of this regulation, all bottom fishing activities in new bottom fishing areas or with bottom gear not previously used in the area concerned, shall be considered as exploratory fisheries and shall be conducted in accordance with an Exploratory Bottom Fisheries Protocol to be adopted as soon as possible. Until such a protocol is adopted the provision set out in the protocol set out in Annex 1 of the NEAFC recommendation on regulating bottom fishing shall apply. 2. The exploratory bottom fishing activities shall be subject to the assessment procedure set forth in Article 5 of the NEAFC recommendation on regulating bottom fishing, with the understanding that particular care shall be taken in the evaluation of risks of the significant adverse impact on vulnerable marine ecosystems, in line with the precautionary approach. 3. Member States shall communicate the required information under the exploratory fisheries protocol referred to in paragraph 1 to the European Commission, together with the information or preliminary impact assessment referred to in Article 5, paragraph 3 (i), below. 4. Member States shall provide 1 year after entry into force of this Regulation, a report of the results of such activities to the European Commission. 5. Prior to commencing new bottom fishing activities based upon the results of exploratory bottom fisheries conducted in the prior two years, the European Commission shall review the assessments undertaken in accordance with Article 5 below and the results of the fishing protocols implemented by the participating fleets, and shall: (i) Authorise these bottom fishing to proceed and establish conservation and management measures to prevent significant adverse impacts on vulnerable marine ecosystems from individual bottom fishing activities and to ensure the long- term sustainability of deep sea fish stocks, or (ii) not authorize these bottom fishing activities to proceed. 6. Member States shall ensure that vessels flying their flag conducting exploratory fisheries have an observer on board. Observers shall collect data in accordance with a Vulnerable Marine Ecosystem Data Collection Protocol to be adopted as soon as possible. Until such a protocol is adopted, the interim protocol set out in Annex 2 of the NEAFC recommendation on regulating bottom fishing shall apply.
2013/09/17
Committee: PECH