3 Amendments of Jacek SARYUSZ-WOLSKI related to 2016/0142(COD)
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) In particular, the use of the mechanism should be facilitated by shortening reference periods and deadlines allowing for a faster procedure and by extending the possible grounds of suspension, which should include a substantial increase in the number of rejected readmission applications for third- country nationals having transited through the third country concerned, where a readmission agreement concluded between the Union or a Member State and that third country provides for such a readmission obligation. The Commission should also be able to trigger the mechanism in case the third country fails to cooperate on readmission, in particular where a readmission agreement has been concluded between the third country concerned and the Union, as well as in the situation if the Commission, following its evaluation, considers that a third country has stepped away from the accomplished benchmarks which were fulfilled in the framework of the visa liberalization dialogue, upon which the visa-free regime was granted.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EC) No 539/2001
Article 1a – paragraph 2 a
Article 1a – paragraph 2 a
2a. Where tThe Commission shas concrete and reliable information of circumstances referred to in points (a), (b) or (c) of paragraph 2, or that thell regularly monitor and evaluate the continuous implementation of reform commitments by a third country is not cooperating on readmission, in particular where a readmission agreement has been concludedbenefiting from visa- free regime, as outlined in an individual visa liberalisation agreement between thate third country and the Union, for instance: – by rejecting or not replying to readmission applicEU, upon which the visa-free regime was granted. The Commission upon its evaluations, – documents for the purposes of return within deadlines specified in the agreement or not accepting European travel documents issued following the lapse of deadlines specified in the agreement, – or by terminating or suspending the agreement, the Commission may, on its own initiative, inform the European Parliament and the Council. This information shall be equivalent to a notification made pursuant to paragraph 2."shall notify the EU Member States and the third country concerned of its assessment and recommend to temporally suspend the visa-free regime, should third country step away from the accomplished benchmarks which were fulfilled in the framework of the visa liberalization dialogue. The visa- free regime should be re-established upon the positive report of the Commission concluding that the benchmarks for visa- free regime are fulfilled again. by failing to issue travel
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 539/2001
Article 1a – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 1a – paragraph 3 a (new)