BETA

12 Amendments of Ana GOMES related to 2011/2025(INI)

Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the EU must equip itself with a comprehensive, coherent and effective framework able to protect the personal data of individuals within and beyond the EU in all circumstances, in order to cope with the numerous challenges facing data protection, such as those caused by globalisation, technological development and security concerns (i.e. fight against terrorism),
2011/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas stakeholders stress the need to enhance legal certainty, reduce the administrative burden and ensure a level playing field for economic operators,
2011/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas a strong data protection framework can strengthen security and trigger trust from individuals in the behaviour of data controllers and enforcement authorities,
2011/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A c (new)
Ac. whereas the large majority of people in the EU Member States considers that awareness of personal data protection in their own country is low,
2011/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas children deserve specific protection, as they may be less aware of risks, consequences, safeguards and rights in relation to the processing of personal data,
2011/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
Eb. whereas current rules and conditions governing the transfer of data from EU citizens to third countries is not clear; whereas this leads to different approaches and practices in different Member States when transferring the data from their citizens to third countries,
2011/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E c (new)
Ec. whereas national data protection authorities are subject to widely diverging rules in the twenty seven Member States, particularly with regard to their status, resources and powers,
2011/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Underlines, furthermore, the importance of improving means of exercising the rights of access, rectification, erasure and blocking of data, and of clarifying and enforcing the ‘right to be forgotten’;
2011/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Urges the Commission to include specific provisions addressing the collection and further processing of children’s data in the forthcoming proposal;
2011/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Takes the view that a Regulation is the most effective instrument to protect the fundamental right to data protection, while avoiding contradictory interpretations and unjustified differences in the implementation and application of the law;
2011/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Calls on the Commission to codify the status of independence of national data protection authorities, as stated in recent jurisprudence from the Court of Justice; stresses that the national data protection authorities should be vested with powers to investigate breaches of data protection rules and impose sufficiently deterring and remedial measures and sanctions;
2011/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 c (new)
15c. Acknowledges the importance of reinforced cooperation between national data protection authorities, integrating the Article 29 Working Party;
2011/05/03
Committee: LIBE