6 Amendments of Anneli JÄÄTTEENMÄKI related to 2011/0386(COD)
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) Strong public finances are best ensured at the planning stage and gross errors, which tend to be made most often in economic boom years, should be identified as early as possible. Member States should benefit not just from the setting of guiding principles and budgetary targets but also from a synchronised monitoring of their budgetary policies.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) This gradually strengthened surveillance will further complement the existing provisions of the Stability and Growth Pact and strengthen the surveillance of budgetary discipline in Member States whose currency is the euro. A gradually enhanced monitoring procedure should contribute to better budgetary outcomes to the benefit of all Member States whose currency is the euro, without creating a surfeit of unnecessary bureaucracy. As part of a gradually strengthened procedure, a closer monitoring is particularly valuable to Member States that are subject to an excessive deficit procedure.
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) In order to enhance the dialogue between the Union institutions, in particular the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, and to ensure the greater transparency and accountability that democracy requires, the competent committee of the European Parliament may offer the opportunity to the Member State concerned by a Commission recommendation to participate in an exchange of views,
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission opinion shall be made public and, a. At the request of the Parliament of the Member State concerned, the Commission shall be presented by the Commission it to the Parliament concerned, giving detailed reasons for the measures called for.
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. In case of risks of non-compliance with the deadline to correct the excessive deficit, the Commission shall address a recommendation to the Member State concerned for adoption of further measures within a timeframe consistent with the deadline for the correction of its excessive deficit referred to in paragraph 1. The recommendation by the CommissCommission opinion shall be made public, and, a. At the request of the Parliament of the Member State concerned, the Commission shall be presented by the Commission it to the Parliament concerned, giving detailed reasons for the measures called for.