4 Amendments of Anneli JÄÄTTEENMÄKI related to 2012/2176(DEC)
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Notes that the Court of Auditors observed some irregularities relating to the procurement procedure and tendering; urges the EEAS to correct any errors and omissions;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the EEAS to identify and consider, in accordance with its political and contractual obligations, every possible option for making major savings in the long term so as to ensure that the variation in its annual budget – the increase in which, for legitimate reasons, is proportionally greater than that of the other institutions’ budgets – can have a multiplier effect;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Urges the High Representative to pay greater attention to achieving a geographical balance in the recruitment of staff, particularly in the appointment of heads of representations and other important posts in the EEAS;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. In the context of the forthcoming entry into force of the EU-Central America Association Agreement, emphasises the need for the EU to have a delegation in Panama, an important partner and the only country in the region without such a delegation, and calls on the EEAS to take acStresses that, given budgetary pressure and constraints, the EEAS should examine critically its network of representations and search for synergies where possible, for example by concentrating business relating to several third countries in one representation towhen this end as soon as possible.is appropriate and justifiable on regional grounds;