Activities of Anneli JÄÄTTEENMÄKI related to 2019/2003(BUD)
Plenary speeches (1)
Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2020 – Section I – European Parliament (debate) FI
Shadow reports (1)
REPORT on Parliament’s estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2020 PDF (394 KB) DOC (148 KB)
Amendments (22)
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that savings of EUR 23 million as compared to the proposal of the Secretary-General are required to limit the overall increase over the 2019 budget to 2,43% and that all efforts to strive for a more efficient and transparent use of public money are strongly encouraged;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes the new approach that has been takenTakes note of increased transparency in the preparation of the Secretary-General’s report during the past years, such as the provision of additional information on medium- and long-term planning, investments, statutory obligations, operational expenditure and methodology, as requested by the budgetary authority;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. ExpectDemands Parliament’s 2020 budget to be realistic and accurate regarding the matching of needs and their costs, to avoid over-budgeting insofar as possible;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Emphasises that maximum care should be taken to ensure that the overall budgetary and staffing resources at Parliament's disposal are used in the most cost-efficient way possible to enable the institution and its Members to fulfil their ultimate mission on legislation successfully; reiterates that this implies careful planning and organisation of its working methods and, whenever possible, the pooling of functions and structures to avoid unnecessary bureaucracy, functional overlaps and duplication of effort and resources;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. Underlines that, in the aftermath of the European elections, the measures and expenses undertaken under the banner of the pre-election communication campaign should be discontinued, including the reinforced financing of the European political parties and foundations as well as the additional staff resources recruited in this regard;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. Wonders about the added value/cost ratio of the installation of the Europa Experience centers in all Member States within 10 to 15 years; asks the Secretary-General whether such analysis has been carried out and if not, considers that such analysis has to be done before proceeding with this project;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. WelcomNotes the creation of a series of mobile installations, which would tour Member States to bring the Union closer to citizens;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Disagrees with the on-going practice of the year-end ‘mopping up transfer’ to contribute to current building projects; highlights that this ‘mopping up transfer’ takes place systematically on the same chapters, titles and, often, exactly on the same budgetary lines and wonders whether there is a programmed over- evaluation of these, in order to generate funds for the financing of the EP building policy; considers that the building policy should be financed in a transparent manner from the budgetary lines dedicated to it;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Takes note thatQuestions the proposal for the rent and maintenance of all existing Luxembourg buildings are stillto be budgeted for the entire year 2020, considering that the removal from existing buildings can onlywill be made gradually; during the year; expects therefore that the first savings on various budget items will be achieved already in 20210;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Asks for further details on preparatory technical works including the relocation of functionalities, such as for those situated in the PHS building, to oQuestions, given that the Bureau decision on the future of the PHS building is not expected before the end of 2019 or the beginning of 2020, the proposal to engage EUR 12,4 million for preparatory technical works including the relocation of functionalities to other buildings and requests to provide the Committee on Budgets with detailed estimations and cost breakdown in this regard before the Parliament’s reading of ther buildingsdget in autumn 2019;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. Questions the very high costs of certain proposed developments, namely: the installation of the Atrium building visitors' seminar rooms (EUR 8,720 million), the multifunctional space in the Esplanade area (EUR 2,610 million), the creation of a self-service canteen in the SDM building in Strasbourg (EUR 1,9 million); calls on the Secretary-General to provide the Committee on Budgets with any information relating to these decisions before the Parliament's reading of the budget in autumn 2019;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 c (new)
Paragraph 18 c (new)
18 c. Is surprised that security cameras are only installed up to the 5th floor of the ASP building; considers that each floor must be equipped with such a camera to allow the "Security Investigations" service of the Parliament to do its work properly, especially in case of theft; considers that the idea is not to make Parliament a “police space”, but rather to guarantee the security of everyone; asks, therefore, to grant the DG safe of the necessary means for the installation of these cameras;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. BelieveConsiders that further savings canshould be achieved as regards the expenditure on furniture for the offices of Members and their assistants, given the complete refurbishment of those offices at the start of the mandate in 2019;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Is concerned by the intentions of the Parliament to expand its activity and diplomatic presence in Indonesia (Jakarta), Ethiopia(Addis Ababa) and the United States (New York); regrets that despite the absence of a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis and further elaboration on the underlying arguments for the choice of these specific locations, the Bureau agreed with the proposal, as well as with the appointment of the current head of the Parliament’s office in Washington D.C. as the new head of office in Jakarta; urges, therefore, the Secretary-General to identify the affected budget lines and to clarify this non- transparent state of affairs through the explanation of the decision-making process regarding these different locations and the appointment of the new head of office in Jakarta; considers, meanwhile, that this decision must be suspended;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19 b. Considers that potential savings to the Parliament’s budget can be achieved with a single seat; recalls the 2014 ECA analysis which estimated the costs of the geographic dispersion of Parliament to be EUR 114 million per year; recalls furthermore that due to this Parliament's geographic dispersion, 78 % of all missions by Parliament statutory staff arise and the environmental impact is between 11 000 and 19 000 tonnes of CO2 emissions; calls therefore for a roadmap to a single seat;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Underlines that the iPACS project will provide Parliament with modern and integrated security technology in order to remove remaining weaknesses in buildings' security, and in 2020 will be in the fifth and final year of implementation; invites the Secretary-General to summarise in detail all expenses linked to the buildings security from 2016;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Reiterates its concern about the additional expenditure on interpretation of the oral explanation of votes and one minute speeches during plenary sessions; urges the Secretary- General to present a detailed cost breakdown related to the oral explanation of votes and one minute speeches; recalls that alternatives, such as a written explanation of votes oras well as various public communication facilities, are available to Members wishing to explain their voting positions or raise issues pertinent to the concerns of their electorate; in that context, considers that in order to achieve significant savings, the oral explanation of votes could be moved to the end of the agenda of each day of the plenary sessionand one minute speeches should be abolished;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28 a. Reiterates its appeal for transparency regarding the General Expenditure Allowance (GEA) for Members; regrets that the Parliament’s Bureau Working Group on the GEA has failed to introduce more transparency and accountability in this regard;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Recommends the greater use of videoconferences and other technologies in order to protect the environment and save resources, in particular by reducing staff duty travel between the three places of work;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34 a (new)
Paragraph 34 a (new)
34 a. Reiterates its call for a detailed assessment of the value added of the several Parliament’s services engaged in research activities, such as European Parliament Research Service (EPRS), thematic policy departments and the Science and Technology Options Assessment (STOA) Panel, including a meaningful evaluation of potential duplication of tasks;